Skip to main content
Loading…
Chamber and committees

Progress on the Automation and Take-up of Scottish Social Security Benefits: Amendment 1

  • Submitted by: Jeremy Balfour, Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 02 November 2022
  • Motion type: Amendment
  • Motion reference: S6M-06572.1
  • Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Thursday, 03 November 2022

As an amendment to motion S6M-06572 in the name of Ben Macpherson (Progress on the Automation and Take-up of Scottish Social Security Benefits), insert at end “; is encouraged by the joint work of the UK and Scottish governments to help all people in Scotland; welcomes the work done by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) to ensure that people are getting their benefits; welcomes the extra funds provided by the UK Government in Barnett consequentials to support struggling families, and expresses disappointment in the delay of the Scottish Welfare Fund review, and in the lack of collection of data by Social Security Scotland.”


Vote

Result 28 for, 83 against, 0 abstained, 18 did not vote Disagreed

Scottish National Party

Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Scottish Labour

Scottish Green Party

Scottish Liberal Democrats

For

0

Against

Abstained

0

Did not vote

No Party Affiliation

For

0

Against

0

Abstained

0

Did not vote


Related motion

Progress on the Automation and Take-up of Scottish Social Security Benefits

Submitted by: Ben Macpherson, Edinburgh Northern and Leith, Scottish National Party

Date lodged: Tuesday, November 1, 2022

Motion reference: S6M-06572

Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Thursday, November 3, 2022

Supported by: Shona Robison

Result 65 for, 46 against, 0 abstained, 18 did not vote Agreed


Amendments

Progress on the Automation and Take-up of Scottish Social Security Benefits: Amendment 2

Submitted by: Pam Duncan-Glancy, Glasgow, Scottish Labour

Date lodged: Wednesday, November 2, 2022

Motion reference: S6M-06572.2

Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Thursday, November 3, 2022

Supported by: Paul Sweeney

Result 48 for, 62 against, 0 abstained, 19 did not vote Disagreed