Skip to main content
Loading…
Chamber and committees

Consent for Jackdaw and Rosebank: Amendment 4

  • Submitted by: Sanne Dijkstra-Downie, Edinburgh Northern, Scottish Liberal Democrats
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 29 September 2026
  • Motion type: Amendment
  • Motion reference: S7M-01376.4
  • Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Wednesday, 30 September 2026

As an amendment to motion S7M-01376 in the name of Liam Kerr (Consent for Jackdaw and Rosebank), leave out from “believes” to end and insert “notes that the UK Government is due to make a determination on the Jackdaw gas field and the Rosebank oil and gas field; recognises that, in an ever-changing geopolitical climate, there is a real need to consider Scotland's energy security; believes that, in the case of the Jackdaw development, there could be arguments in favour of consent, including lower carbon intensity, improving UK energy security and economic benefits for those communities directly linked to the oil and gas sector that risk being left behind without a strong just transition; further believes, however, that any decision on consent should not delay the transition away from fossil fuels nor the work required to reduce demand for oil and gas; believes that there is a strong need for a greater electrification of heating, transport and industry, an improvement in energy efficiency in homes and an expansion of renewable energy in order to meet net zero objectives, and calls on both the Scottish and UK governments to work together to reduce emissions, drive down demand on fossil fuels and deliver a just transition."


Vote

Result 8 for, 94 against, 16 abstained, 11 did not vote Disagreed

Scottish National Party

Reform UK

Scottish Labour

Scottish Green Party

Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Scottish Liberal Democrats

No Party Affiliation

For

0

Against

0

Abstained

0

Did not vote


Related motion

Consent for Jackdaw and Rosebank

Submitted by: Liam Kerr, North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Date lodged: Monday, September 28, 2026

Motion reference: S7M-01376

Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Wednesday, September 30, 2026

Supported by: Stephen Kerr

Result 78 for, 41 against, 0 abstained, 10 did not vote Agreed


Amendments

Consent for Jackdaw and Rosebank: Amendment 1

Submitted by: Kristopher Leask, Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party

Date lodged: Tuesday, September 29, 2026

Motion reference: S7M-01376.1

Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Wednesday, September 30, 2026

Result 15 for, 101 against, 0 abstained, 13 did not vote Disagreed


Consent for Jackdaw and Rosebank: Amendment 2

Submitted by: Duncan Massey, North East Scotland, Reform UK

Date lodged: Tuesday, September 29, 2026

Motion reference: S7M-01376.2

Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Wednesday, September 30, 2026

Result 27 for, 92 against, 0 abstained, 10 did not vote Disagreed


Consent for Jackdaw and Rosebank: Amendment 3

Submitted by: Daniel Johnson, Edinburgh Southern, Scottish Labour

Date lodged: Tuesday, September 29, 2026

Motion reference: S7M-01376.3

Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Wednesday, September 30, 2026

Result 77 for, 42 against, 0 abstained, 10 did not vote Agreed


Consent for Jackdaw and Rosebank: Amendment 5

Submitted by: Stephen Gethins, Dundee City East, Scottish National Party

Date lodged: Tuesday, September 29, 2026

Motion reference: S7M-01376.5

Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Wednesday, September 30, 2026

Supported by: Jamie Hepburn, John Swinney

Result 53 for, 66 against, 0 abstained, 10 did not vote Disagreed