Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…
Chamber and committees

Meeting of the Parliament

Meeting date: Wednesday, October 9, 2013


Contents


Portfolio Question Time


Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth


Non-profit-distributing Model Spending



1. To ask the Scottish Government for what reason its planned investment in 2014-15 using the non-profit-distributing model has decreased by £164 million since September 2012. (S4O-02472)

The Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth (John Swinney)

In the short term, NPD investment is lower than was originally forecast. As I set out in the budget statement, that is for two reasons: first, some NPD projects are being concluded at a lower cost; and, secondly, some projects are taking longer to be prepared and planned.

Elaine Murray

According to the Scottish Parliament financial scrutiny unit briefing on the 2014-15 draft budget, planned NPD investment this financial year is 45 per cent less than was estimated in September last year and the projected spend for next year is down by 17 per cent. How accurate are the current figures for planned NPD investment? Will they, too, be reduced by September next year?

John Swinney

The Government has committed itself to a programme of NPD investment covering a range of projects, some of which will be material to Dr Murray’s constituency—the Dumfries and Galloway acute services redevelopment project among others. The purpose of the programme is to deal with the reductions in capital expenditure that the Scottish Government has experienced as a consequence of the budget priorities of the United Kingdom Government.

The Scottish Government’s programme is designed to ensure that we deliver value for money, which is why some of the projects are coming in at a lower estimate than we expected, which is to be welcomed by Parliament. Also, some of the projects are taking longer to procure for two reasons. First, NPD investment is not, by its nature, as swift to deliver as capital expenditure in its traditional form, which is part of our argument why capital expenditure should not have been reduced. Secondly, the projects are complex and involve a range of different factors being planned and procured at the same time. Ensuring that we get projects off on the right footing is the correct approach to take if we are to maximise value for money for the public purse.

This year’s planned NPD investment sees a drop from £338 million to £185 million. What percentage of that drop can be attributed to savings?

John Swinney

Some of it will be down to the reductions in the costs that projects are being procured for, and some of it is down to the factors that I explained to Dr Murray a moment ago, which include the time that it is taking to ensure that the projects go ahead. The key point is that all the projects that the Government has committed to undertaking will be undertaken as part of the NPD programme. The Government will ensure that the resources that support the delivery of those projects are in place as part of the programme, which we have acknowledged to Parliament will take some time for us to deliver.


Small Business Bonus Scheme



2. To ask the Scottish Government how its small business bonus scheme has helped businesses in West Scotland. (S4O-02473)

The Minister for Local Government and Planning (Derek Mackay)

More than 89,000 business properties in Scotland are benefiting from the small business bonus scheme. That means that two out of five business premises in Scotland are paying zero or reduced business rates under the SBBS. Many thousands of the businesses that are benefiting are located in West Scotland.

Offering savings of up to £4,620 in the current financial year, the scheme provides vital support and help to small businesses throughout the country in the current economic climate. In the next few weeks, the Minister for Energy, Enterprise and Tourism, Fergus Ewing, will write to every business to ensure that no one in Scotland misses out who may be eligible for the small business bonus scheme but is not claiming.

Mary Fee

Does the minister agree that Renfrewshire Council’s retail improvement scheme has been successful as a creative and innovative scheme that is designed to support small businesses and shops and to improve the appearance of our high streets? Will the Scottish Government roll out the scheme throughout Scotland as part of the town centre review?

Derek Mackay

I agree with Mary Fee that such initiatives are well worth while. If I remember correctly, I started the scheme when I was the leader of Renfrewshire Council and we gave the successor administration a range of good ideas about how we can support town centres. That is why I am particularly looking forward to the Government’s response to the external advisory group on town centres.

I return to the small business bonus. I am sure that Mary Fee will welcome the fact that more than 2,500 businesses in Renfrewshire benefited from the small business bonus, to a value of more than £4 million in rates relief—of course, all opposed by the Labour Party.


Black and Ethnic Minorities (Underemployment)



3. To ask the Scottish Government what programmes it has to reduce underemployment among black and ethnic minority people and support them into employment. (S4O-02474)

The Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth (John Swinney)

The Scottish Government is taking a range of steps to address underemployment for all those affected in Scotland, through both our work to promote stronger economic growth and the reform of post-16 education and training, to ensure that our skills provision meets the demands of current and future labour markets.

In addition, specific equality programme funding between 2008 and 2015 will provide £5.756 million across 24 organisations that work to improve employment and employability of black and minority ethnic communities across Scotland.

Hanzala Malik

Although the ethnicity and employment information from the 2011 census has not come out, analysis based on the 2001 census showed that unemployment rates were higher for all visible minority groups. The figures for some particular groups were double those for the indigenous community. If the 2011 census analysis shows that the pattern persists, will the cabinet secretary commit to positive action on employment for Scotland’s growing ethnic minority population?

John Swinney

The objective of ensuring that there are opportunities for all citizens in Scotland to fulfil their economic potential lies at the very heart of the Government’s agenda. Therefore, it is fundamentally important to the Government that we provide the necessary support to minority ethnic communities.

In my original answer I highlighted the specific equality programme funding that is available. I say to Mr Malik that the Government will continue to monitor any new information that emerges, particularly information that emerges out of the analysis of the 2011 census. As part of our commitment to ensure that there are opportunities for all our citizens to flourish, we will take whatever steps we can to support the journey into employability of people from ethnic minorities and to support them in those efforts.

Question 4 has not been lodged by Graeme Pearson and an explanation has been provided.


Wind Farm Developments (Jobs)



5. To ask the Scottish Government how many jobs will be directly created as a result of offshore wind farm developments. (S4O-02476)

The Minister for Energy, Enterprise and Tourism (Fergus Ewing)

The size of the offshore renewables market and its associated employment at present rests on the ambition of the United Kingdom Government to develop the market through the current electricity market reform. The Scottish Government continues to make the case for ambitious reforms to support the sector, and it looks forward to a positive conclusion to the UK Government’s current consultation.

Alex Johnstone

When the Scottish Conservatives asked a similar question regarding onshore wind, the First Minister initially stated that 18,000 were employed in the industry. He subsequently downgraded that to 11,000. Further work by the Scottish Conservatives indicated that the true number at the time was 2,235. At this time, when the Government is trying to promote offshore wind as a potential large-scale employer, would the minister like to take the opportunity to downplay the ambitious claims that appear to have peppered previous contributions to the debate?

Fergus Ewing

I always try to be realistic.

Just yesterday, I attended an event in Largs, at which Arriva announced its support of 16 young people to do a pre-apprenticeship wind technician training course at Fife College. Just last week I met Repsol; I also met SSE, which has 800 people employed in Scotland who are dependent on wind farms. In recent times I have met EDF Energy, EDPR and Scottish Power. All those companies—and many more—are supportive of onshore and offshore wind.

I find it a bit difficult to understand the Conservative policy, since some members—such as Alex Johnstone and Murdo Fraser beside him—seem to be opposed to wind farms, some are in favour of them and, indeed, some have one of their own.


Oil and Gas Installation Decommissioning (Economic Opportunities)



6. To ask the Scottish Government what economic opportunities will arise from the decommissioning of oil and gas installations. (S4O-02477)

The Minister for Energy, Enterprise and Tourism (Fergus Ewing)

Decommissioning presents enormous opportunities. Estimates vary, but it is likely that decommissioning will be worth more than £30 billion by 2040, and that opportunity must be grasped by the Scottish supply chain. Moreover, that figure does not include the future international opportunities that Scotland’s enterprise agencies are considering.

Maureen Watt

Does the minister agree that the expertise that Scotland will gain in decommissioning will be similar to the country’s expertise in operating subsea? That will give Scottish companies a competitive advantage in gaining future international contracts in that area, and help to grow further our supply chain companies and our exports.

Fergus Ewing

Yes, I do. Maureen Watt is very knowledgeable about the industry, and she knows that our subsea sector is pre-eminent in the world, which should also be the case with decommissioning.

I should add that we do not wish for the premature cessation of production: we want fields to continue to produce for as long as they can and to maximise their production. We want to get the maximum benefit that we can. However, it is plain that some installations need to be decommissioned, and that is quite simply an enormous opportunity for Scotland. There are concerns that, because of investments in vessels such as the Pieter Schelte and other investments by Norway, the United Kingdom Government may not be ready to grasp the thistle—as it were—and ensure that we do not lose those advantages.

I attended a conference recently in St Andrews that was hosted by Decom North Sea, and it was plain that there is huge interest in the area at present. The Scottish Government will honour our decommissioning responsibilities fully in the event of a yes vote in the referendum, and that will provide us with the most stable environment to ensure that Scotland has the competitive advantage in decommissioning, as it will in the oil and gas industry as a whole.


Towns (Improvement)



7. To ask the Scottish Government what economic measures the Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth can introduce to help improve towns. (S4O-02478)

The Minister for Local Government and Planning (Derek Mackay)

Last week I launched the town centre housing fund, which is aimed at bringing town centre properties back into use for affordable housing. We developed that fund in response to the early ideas that emerged from the national review of town centres; we are currently considering the review group’s final report and recommendations, which we received in July. Our response will be published later this year, and will set out further measures that the Scottish Government will take to support and improve our town centres.

What can our local communities do to access that fund ahead of subsequent reports? What help does the Government think the fund will be able to provide for the economies of our towns?

Derek Mackay

The town centre housing fund is a £2 million demonstration project, which will do what it says on the tin: it will demonstrate what can be achieved by repopulating—and potentially converting the status of—empty properties.

We are inviting housing associations, local authorities and private developers to consider bidding for project funding. The fund is one of the early projects that has emerged from the town centre strategy, and I am sure that it will send a positive message throughout Scotland about our intentions to support our town centres. This particular project is good because of its ambitions to repopulate town centres, its footfall strategy and its approach to tackling blight in our town centres.

Incidentally, our target of 30,000 affordable homes is very much on track.

Murdo Fraser (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con)

I am sure that the minister will have seen the comments from the Federation of Small Businesses suggesting that the closure of public counters in police stations will be bad for local economies. Does he agree that small towns such as Blairgowrie, in John Swinney’s constituency, will be adversely affected if those closures go ahead?

Derek Mackay

Those issues must be considered in the round. As part of the town centre response, we will look closely at public sector properties and the role that they play in town centres. One of the external advisory group’s recommendations is for a town centre presumption in planning and in relation to public sector assets. The Government is actively considering that, and it will be reported on once we release the Government’s strategy on town centres.

Footfall in town centres is of great importance, and will be a key consideration in any action that the Government takes.


Aberdeen City Council (Economic Development)



8. To ask the Scottish Government what recent discussions it has had with Aberdeen City Council regarding economic development. (S4O-02479)

The Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth (John Swinney)

The Scottish Government is in regular discussion with Aberdeen City Council regarding economic development. I met the leader and chief executive of the council in July and the Deputy First Minister met them again in August. On-going engagement takes place through the activities of the Scottish cities alliance, which recognises the role that cities play as drivers of economic growth and aims to increase investment and jobs in our cities and their surrounding regions. Both the Deputy First Minister and the leader of Aberdeen City Council attended the alliance’s recent leadership group meeting in September.

Kevin Stewart

When the leader of Aberdeen City Council appeared in front of the Local Government and Regeneration Committee today, he talked about Aberdeen’s vibrant economy and about various funding streams, but he made no mention of tax increment financing, which would of course lead to greater economic growth. Has there been any application from Aberdeen City Council for TIF funding since its decision to abandon the city garden project scheme?

John Swinney

The last application from the city council for a TIF project was in August 2012. Since last August, there has been nothing that would constitute an application in the terms that Mr Stewart asked about. The Government made clear that our willingness to take forward the TIF proposition was conditional on agreement emerging to take forward the Union Terrace gardens project, which was supported by the population in Aberdeen. It is a matter of regret that the project has not been able to proceed, despite the public support that was expressed for it.

Lewis Macdonald (North East Scotland) (Lab)

As the cabinet secretary will recall, there was great disappointment in Aberdeen that the promised sum of several millions of pounds in business rates incentivisation did not materialise for the latest financial year. Can he offer any better hope that Aberdeen will benefit directly from its great success in increasing its level of business rates generation and, indeed, the level of economic activity in the city over the past 12 months?

John Swinney

As Mr Macdonald should know if he was following the sequence of parliamentary questions that were asked on this subject, Mr Mackay dealt with that issue just the other week in response to parliamentary questions. In that answer, Mr Mackay essentially made two points, which I will reiterate today.

First, the business rates incentivisation scheme is designed to ensure that authorities that have exceeded targets that are set in a way that was not influenced by exceptional circumstances around the revaluation process or the appeals process—which has been the case in relation to the business rates incentivisation targets that we put in place—will be able to share in the proceeds of those achievements. We have discussed with local government the fact that the revaluation process and the appeals process have essentially delayed some applications into the business rates scheme, and that would essentially have distorted some of the outcomes of the business rates incentivisation scheme assessment.

Mr Mackay’s second point was that when, in response to some of the points that had been made, we analysed the valuation base in Aberdeen, we saw that the valuation base had in fact fallen. Therefore, the point on which Mr Macdonald has founded his argument—that the valuation benefit to Aberdeen should somehow accrue into the business rates incentivisation scheme—is not actually borne out by the facts of the circumstances. I hope that that helps Mr Macdonald in answering the issue that he has raised.

Local government has said that it does not want to conclude the discussions that we have embarked on about the business rates incentivisation scheme until there is an audit of the 2012-13 data, which will not be completed until the spring of 2014. If local authorities want to proceed expeditiously on the matter, I suggest that they reconsider the decision that they have taken in that respect.


Lanarkshire Business Gateway Contract



9. To ask the Scottish Government how it monitors the business gateway contract in Lanarkshire. (S4O-02480)

The Minister for Energy, Enterprise and Tourism (Fergus Ewing)

Responsibility for the management, performance and monitoring of the delivery of the business gateway services across Lanarkshire rests with North Lanarkshire Council. North Lanarkshire Council works in partnership with South Lanarkshire Council to ensure that the service is addressing the needs of both local authority areas. The Scottish Government is a member of the business gateway management group, which receives reports on the performance of the service across Scotland.

John Wilson

As the minister is aware, although the Official Journal of the European Union tender process was gone through to deliver the Lanarkshire business gateway contract, only one tender submission was received and the contract was awarded to Lanarkshire Enterprise Services Ltd. Has that tendering situation been repeated in other business gateway areas? Will we closely monitor the delivery of business gateway services in Lanarkshire to ensure the maximum impact of the £6.8 million contract?

Fergus Ewing

I can look into the specific point that the member makes and report back to him but, plainly, it is the responsibility of local government to determine how best to deliver business gateway services, and rightly so. Sometimes, there are few tender responses or even only a single one. I suggest that that is not in any way unique. Lanarkshire Enterprise Services was the successful tenderer and it was also successful in winning bids for the service in Ayrshire and Renfrewshire. It is an enterprise trust—a private sector not-for-profit organisation—whose chief executive is Ronnie Smith, with whom I have had many dealings. He has always evinced strong leadership and support for business. I hope and have confidence that that will be the case in respect of his new duties in serving Lanarkshire.


Fife Economy (Support)



10. To ask the Scottish Government how it supports Fife’s economy. (S4O-02481)

The Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth (John Swinney)

The Scottish Government is committed to supporting sustainable economic growth across Scotland, including in Fife, and we are using all available levers to deliver that growth. We have focused our budget on delivering investment, protecting household incomes and creating jobs. Just last week, I heard direct from businesses attending the Fife economy partnership about their views on what would support growth and how we can support them.

The impact of our strong support is being felt across the economy in Fife, from our investment in major infrastructure projects such as the Queensferry crossing, which is employing 700 people on site, to business support from Scottish Enterprise, which account manages more than 100 companies, and the small business bonus scheme, which benefits more than 5,500 small businesses.

Claire Baker

Fife has a number of major towns and their high streets are a vital part of our economy and communities. The UK Government is consulting on planning rules to encourage a change of use from retail to residential. To follow on from Nigel Don’s question, I welcome the fund that was announced earlier this week. Will the Scottish Government take steps to overcome the identified barriers, such as the restrictions on the selling of long leaseholds over shops and the 20-year limit on residential leaseholds?

John Swinney

The Government will certainly examine that material carefully. As Claire Baker will recall, in the budget last year I set out the provisions that would be put in place, which Mr Mackay has now announced, to enable the utilisation of existing properties in town centres that no longer have a retail function or that are no longer of appeal to the retail market to be transformed into accommodation that could be used to repopulate town centres. The Government has already taken steps to encourage that process. We will see the fruits of the work that Mr Mackay has announced and consider exactly what further steps we need to take. However, as I discussed last week with the Fife economy partnership in our consideration of the role of town centres, we believe in the importance of providing more reasons to increase footfall in town centres and of encouraging greater activity in them.

As a regular visitor to Dunfermline, I ask the cabinet secretary how the Forth replacement crossing is benefiting Fife.

John Swinney

As I said in my answer to Claire Baker, the Queensferry crossing currently employs more than 700 people and 365 Scottish firms are benefiting as a consequence of the contractual activity that is under way. The project is about 40 per cent complete and more than 75 per cent of the contractor procurement has been completed.

Of course, Mr Kidd will be aware that the Government announced that we are able to deliver the Queensferry crossing on a lower budget than we had anticipated as a consequence of the effective contract management that the Government has put in place in planning for the project.

I call Annabelle Ewing, whose question should refer to Fife, please.

What collective savings have small and medium-sized enterprises in Fife made as a result of this Scottish National Party Government’s business rates package?

John Swinney

On an annual basis, the business rates relief package over which the Government presides saves businesses in Scotland about £570 million in reduced business rates. In Fife, more than 5,500 business properties currently benefit from the small business bonus scheme and have saved almost £36 million in business rates taxation since the Government introduced the scheme. By putting in place a business rates relief package totalling £570 million per annum, the Government does a significant amount to assist businesses in the kingdom of Fife. We deliver the most competitive proposition on business rates in any part of the United Kingdom, which is a point that the Parliament should welcome.


Economic Development Programmes (Discussions with United Kingdom Government)



11. To ask the Scottish Government what discussions it has with the UK Government regarding economic development programmes. (S4O-02482)

The Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth (John Swinney)

Scottish Government ministers and officials are in regular contact with their counterparts in the United Kingdom Government about a range of issues affecting economic development. Those include the proposed small business strategy being developed by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, the start-up loans scheme and its extension to Scotland and European structural programmes as examples of current areas of discussion.

Drew Smith

The cabinet secretary will be aware of the call that is being made by Glasgow City Council for a greater role for local authorities in economic development and the proposal that both the UK and Scottish Governments should work together with the council and other local authorities in the region to develop a city deal for Glasgow similar to those agreed for comparable cities in England. Does the cabinet secretary support such an approach, which recognises the importance of city regions as major drivers of the Scottish and United Kingdom economies?

John Swinney

Much of that ground has been covered by two things. The first is the work that the Scottish Government has taken forward over a number of years on the Scottish cities alliance, which was designed to recognise the significance of cities and their role in the wider economy and to encourage and facilitate their development.

The second is the significant flexibility that has been provided to local authorities by this Government’s decision to reduce very significantly the ring fencing of local authority activity. When I became the finance minister, ring fencing of local authority funding stood at £2.7 billion. It now stands at £0.2 billion. Very significant flexibility has been awarded to local authorities to enable them to take steps forward.

I remind Mr Smith that in the previous session of Parliament the Government agreed with local authorities that they would be primarily responsible for local economic development. Under the existing arrangements, there is absolutely nothing to stop cities such as Glasgow contributing to the work on economic development and to fulfilling their ambitions within the flexible framework that the Scottish Government has created.


South Lanarkshire Council (Economic Development Discussions)



12. To ask the Scottish Government when it last met South Lanarkshire Council to discuss economic development. (S4O-02483)

Ministers and officials regularly meet local authorities across Scotland to discuss a range of issues including supporting economic growth.

Linda Fabiani

Does the cabinet secretary agree that it is vital that South Lanarkshire Council prioritise economic development in East Kilbride so that the town’s position as Lanarkshire’s most successful business location is maintained? Will he assure me, therefore, that the Scottish Government’s support for the work of the East Kilbride task force is on-going?

John Swinney

I certainly acknowledge the issues that Linda Fabiani raises. She has put those points to ministers on a number of occasions. The task force that South Lanarkshire Council established is crucial in taking forward this area of work. The Scottish Government’s interests in this respect are represented by the participation of a senior director of business infrastructure from Scottish Enterprise on the East Kilbride task force.

Of course, we welcome the focus of the task force, which has been on supporting employability programmes, on ensuring that training activities can be undertaken, on the improvement to town centre facilities and on a variety of other projects that I am sure will assist in strengthening the position of East Kilbride as the main retail centre within Lanarkshire. The Government will continue to engage with the project through the channel that I set out in my answer.


“Stabilisation and Savings Funds for Scotland”



13. To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on the findings of the second report of the fiscal commission working group. (S4O-02484)

The Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth (John Swinney)

The Scottish Government is grateful for the work that has been undertaken by the experts on the working group in developing its proposals for a stabilisation fund and a long-term savings fund.

As the working group highlighted, of the world’s top 20 oil producers, only the United Kingdom and Iraq do not operate some form of recognised sovereign wealth fund. With more than half the wholesale value of North Sea oil and gas still to be extracted, there is an overwhelming case for the Government of an independent Scotland to establish the two funds in question.

The working group’s report sets out a framework that will help to maximise the economic opportunity that Scotland’s oil and gas wealth presents. Its proposals would ensure that that wealth provides a lasting benefit for future generations and put to rest any fears about oil price fluctuations impacting on future Scottish budgets.

Bill Kidd

I thank the cabinet secretary for his very full response. Has any thought been given as to how to ensure that the establishment of a fund to benefit future generations of the Scottish people—along the lines of the one that has been established in Norway—will actually deliver to people in the whole of Scotland?

John Swinney

The working group has set out a detailed model for the operation of a long-term savings fund, which would be in place essentially to ensure that future generations benefited from the oil wealth that is generated in the current environment. The purpose of the savings fund is of course to ensure that there is an opportunity for long-term benefits to be realised by the population of Scotland. It would be for future Administrations to determine how that would be allocated and taken forward.

It is important to realise that if, as the fiscal commission points out, Scotland had had some form of long-term investment fund, we would have had an oil fund that would be valued at in excess of £80 billion to £100 billion. That would have been a significant strengthening of the public finances of an independent Scotland.


Proposed Community Empowerment and Renewal Bill



14. To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on progress on the proposed community empowerment and renewal bill. (S4O-02485)

The First Minister announced in the programme for government that the community empowerment and renewal bill will form a key part of this year’s legislative programme. We intend to publish a consultation on a draft bill in November.

Jayne Baxter

I thank the minister for that answer and for his earlier comments on empty properties in town centres. The minister will be aware of my long-standing interest in the problems that are faced by many local authorities in tackling dilapidated buildings and the negative impact that such neglected properties have on the local community.

Although it is right that the majority of the financial burden of tackling dilapidated property should fall on the owner, in the current financial climate many property owners are failing to raise the necessary finance for repairs. Will the minister take into account the problems that are faced by local authorities in tackling derelict buildings when he brings forward the legislation, and will he do that as soon as possible?

Derek Mackay

Yes, I will. The Government will certainly consider that issue—it would be our intention to take that forward in the consultation on the proposed bill. The member asked about the timescale for the bill—the bill is a year 3 piece of legislation and is in keeping with the parliamentary timetable. I believe that we will not just fulfil but surpass our manifesto commitment. We have great support on the bill: we have the reference group and we are also working in partnership with the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities. This is an empowering Government and I think that it will be an empowering bill. I thank Jayne Baxter for her interest, as well as David Stewart, who also has an interest in the issue.


Family Budgets (Protection)



15. To ask the Scottish Government how its economic policy protects family budgets. (S4O-02486)

The Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth (John Swinney)

The Scottish Government has taken positive action to help support hard-pressed families and protect family budgets. That action includes measures such as freezing the council tax, maintaining free personal and nursing care, the removal of prescription charges, the provision of free eye examinations, an increase in free nursery provision, the abolition of tuition fees, providing a minimum income for students, providing the education maintenance allowance, and maintaining the concessionary travel scheme for the disabled and for the older members of our society.

The Scottish Government is also helping households on the lowest incomes and is leading by example by ensuring that all public sector staff who are under our direct responsibility receive a living wage, which is above the statutory minimum wage, and by encouraging all other employers to do the same.

I thank the cabinet secretary for his comprehensive answer. What impact will those excellent Scottish National Party Scottish Government policies have specifically on family budgets in Fife?

Members: Oh dear!

John Swinney

I counsel the Opposition against scoffing about the genuine commitments that have been made to support hard-pressed families at this time. Over the duration of the current parliamentary session, the council tax freeze will mean that band D property households will save £1,200 at a time when costs are rising and individuals are looking to the Scottish Government to provide them with practical support. Again on the council tax freeze, the average Fife Council band D property household should expect to save around £1,450 by the end of 2016-17. That is, of course, in addition to the economic benefit that people in Fife will have experienced as a consequence of this Administration being the one that abolished toll charges on the Forth and Tay bridges.

I understand that one of the great dinosaurs of the Labour Party got rather confused and thought that the Labour Party had abolished tolls on the Forth and Tay bridges, but I am delighted to confirm to Parliament—to help the recollection of one of Labour’s great dinosaurs—that it was an SNP Government that abolished tolls on the Forth and Tay road bridges.

Every day families in Fife tell my colleagues that they are very keen on Ed Miliband’s commitment to an energy price freeze. Will the finance secretary commit to the same 20-month energy price freeze if he gets an independent Scotland?

John Swinney

Jenny Marra should not scoff at the Government’s commitments, which have delivered more substantive support to the people of Fife than any possible proposition of the leader of the Labour Party would. We are keen to defend our record, which has delivered for the people of Fife, and the people of Fife know the value of an SNP Government that is on their side.

One of the ways of helping some of the most hard-pressed families in Fife would be to provide adequate support around the bedroom tax. Will the minister now sign up to Jackie Baillie’s bill?

John Swinney

The problem with the point that Neil Findlay has just made is that there is no legal basis for us to deliver what he is banging on about. As Shelter Scotland has quite rightly pointed out, under the law the Government is able to deliver up to £20 million of additional support in discretionary housing payments. Where was that law set? That law was set in London by a Tory and Liberal Government that the Labour Party is quite happy to keep there and to allow to impose the bedroom tax. Before Mr Findlay passes the buck down to his pals in London and allows them to carry on legislating to harm the people of Scotland, he should start to realise that the solutions can be delivered in Scotland by the powers of independence.


Local Authority Planning Disputes (Redress)



16. To ask the Scottish Government what avenues of redress are available to residents and community councils involved in local authority planning disputes. (S4O-02487)

The Minister for Local Government and Planning (Derek Mackay)

Residents and community councils have the opportunity to make representations in respect of planning applications. It is for the planning authority to decide how much weight is given to any representation in reaching its decision. When a decision is made and a resident or community council is dissatisfied, they may seek a judicial review of the decision. When there is a concern that procedures might not have been followed correctly, a complaint can be made to the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman.

Sandra White

I do not know whether the minister is aware that I have been contacted by constituents with regard to the demolition of tenement properties in Colebrooke Street in my constituency. Permission to demolish was not granted, but when Glasgow City Council development and regeneration services department was contacted on the issue, it said that it was common practice and that the act of demolition is not its responsibility but that of other departments. Does the minister know whether that is normal practice for local authorities? Any advice that he can give local residents on the issue would be most welcome.

As the member will be aware, it would be inappropriate for me to comment on individual circumstances. However, if she cares to give me further details, I will have officials investigate the matter.