Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…
Chamber and committees

Plenary, 05 Feb 2009

Meeting date: Thursday, February 5, 2009


Contents


Question Time


SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE


Education and Lifelong Learning


Parenting Skills

To ask the Scottish Executive, in light of the publication of the early years framework, what it is doing to address parenting skills. (S3O-5817)

The Minister for Children and Early Years (Adam Ingram):

The Scottish Government has recognised the central importance of parenting and family capacity in delivering improved outcomes for children and families by making it one of the key elements for transformational change in the early years framework. The framework has been developed in partnership with local government and ensures that the right help is available to children and families at the right time.

The Scottish Government is committed to providing early support to parents, and it has a range of policies and programmes that provide support for parenting either directly or indirectly. This includes funding for a range of parenting programmes that promote positive parenting skills and support to parents, especially at challenging times.

Will the minister give more detail on the practical steps that the Government is taking to prepare people for the responsibilities of parenthood—particularly in situations where parenting skills seem increasingly to be lacking?

Adam Ingram:

One of our major initiatives works through the curriculum for excellence. We are trying to provide our schoolchildren not only with skills for work or learning but with skills for life. The development of the health and wellbeing strands within the curriculum for excellence is addressing many of the issues that we have to get across to youngsters who are approaching adulthood.

A significant problem in many communities is a high rate of teenage pregnancy. That is one issue that we may be able to tackle by means of early interventions through the education system. We have a host of other programmes, one of which is on care pathways relating to birth and is aimed particularly at first-time mothers. We will develop that programme within the early years framework.

Karen Whitefield (Airdrie and Shotts) (Lab):

Is the minister aware of the excellent work that is being carried out at St Serf's primary and nursery school in my constituency and in other nurture classes in North Lanarkshire? The classes provide individual and intensive support to children from difficult backgrounds. Does the minister agree that providing support to the parents of those children through home-school link workers is equally important? Can he tell us how the Government will ensure that such initiatives are rolled out across Scotland?

Adam Ingram:

Yes, I can. I am a firm advocate of the nurture-group approach. Ken Macintosh will remember that I was very keen to push the idea in the previous session of Parliament. To his credit, Peter Peacock took it up and ran with it.

Early last year—in March, I think—we had a three-day training course for local authorities across the country on how to set up nurture groups properly. I am very much in favour of what is happening in the member's constituency, and the Government is supporting it.


Education (Funding)

To ask the Scottish Executive whether it considers that the local authority settlement for 2008 and 2009 provides sufficient resources for education. (S3O-5776)

The Cabinet Secretary for Education and Lifelong Learning (Fiona Hyslop):

Yes. The total package of local government funding from 2008 to 2010 is £23 billion. The level of support in 2009-10 represents an increase of 9.9 per cent on the 2007-08 figures and includes capital funding for local government for this year and next of £2 billion, a significant increase over previous years. Obviously, both packages are subject to parliamentary approval.

Through the provisional outturn and budget estimate returns, local authorities estimate that their net revenue education budgets for 2008-09 are, on average, 5.5 per cent higher than those that were set for 2007-08. Although those estimates are provisional and need to be treated with some caution, they are reported directly by local authorities and provide evidence of increased spending on education this financial year.

Ms Alexander:

I invite the cabinet secretary to comment on the reasons behind a fall of 119 in the number of teacher posts in Renfrewshire. The figures show that there were 42 fewer teachers in Renfrewshire primary schools and 77 fewer teachers in Renfrewshire secondary schools in 2008 than in the previous year. Is such a cut either necessary or desirable?

Fiona Hyslop:

The employment of teachers is, of course, a matter for Renfrewshire Council, but any consideration of the situation must include the outcomes for children. I am pleased to see that, in Renfrewshire Council, the average class size for mathematics and English in secondary 1 and 2 is 20.1 and that only three of the 395 classes go beyond that figure. I am also delighted to hear that Renfrewshire Council will invest £53 million in its school estate. Indeed, one of the schools in line for some of that investment is Wendy Alexander's old school, Park Mains high school.

Murdo Fraser (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con):

The cabinet secretary might be aware that our friends in the Liberal Democrats are claiming to have secured extra money for school buildings as part of this week's budget settlement. How much extra money have they secured, when will it be available, and how many new schools will be built?

Fiona Hyslop:

I am delighted that we are progressing the school building programme. As the First Minister made clear earlier, 150 new schools have been built since May 2007, and a record level of investment in schools—£2 billion—is being made now and over the next few years. I am also delighted to say that the Scottish Futures Trust will support its first school project over the course of the year and that the accompanying funding and revenue stream will be available in the year of that spend.

Kenneth Gibson (Cunninghame North) (SNP):

Ms Alexander sheds crocodile tears about the level of resources available to Renfrewshire Council to spend on education. In her now infamous hungry caterpillar speech, she deplored Scottish National Party targets on efficiency savings, claiming that the public sector—

Can we have a question, please, Mr Gibson? You are asking a supplementary question.

—was fatter and should therefore slim down faster than the United Kingdom with its 3 per cent year-on-year cuts. What impact would such year-on-year cuts have on local government and education in our schools?

Fiona Hyslop:

A 3 per cent efficiency saving in education budgets would have had a serious impact, and the fact that local authorities can not only retain efficiency savings but reinvest them in services such as education is to be welcomed. I am pleased that Marilyne MacLaren, the education convener of the City of Edinburgh Council, has said:

"I am very pleased and relieved to be able to announce that the administration will be protecting schools in the forthcoming budget, and therefore there will be no cuts to direct school funding this year."

I do not think that the same reassurance could have been given if the 3 per cent efficiency savings that the previous Administration had proposed and which could not have been recycled had been made.

Mike Rumbles (West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) (LD):

I was surprised to hear the cabinet secretary tell Wendy Alexander that she thinks that the capital funding is sufficient, only then to confirm to Murdo Fraser that the new funding stream for new schools from the Scottish Futures Trust will come on-stream at the end of the year. Given that Aberdeenshire Council is paying for all its primary school rebuilding and the rebuilding of one academy and needs access to £200 million to build five new academies from scratch, will it be at the head of the queue to access money from the new funding stream?

Fiona Hyslop:

I am sure that the member will not be backward in coming forward and ensuring that Aberdeenshire Council's case for being at the front of the queue is made. I look forward to the results of the school estate strategy, which is being conducted with our local government partners; I look forward to the Scottish Futures Trust rolling out its programme; and, finally, I look forward to the accompanying revenue stream, which will enable us to continue to build on the brick-for-brick promise that we made and are keeping and to ensure that 250 schools are built in the lifetime of this Parliament.


Further Education Colleges (Staff Salaries)

To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will introduce a national salary structure for lecturing staff in further education colleges. (S3O-5784)

The Cabinet Secretary for Education and Lifelong Learning (Fiona Hyslop):

Ministers no longer have a power of direction over individual colleges. Colleges are independent employers and the salaries that they pay are not a matter for ministers. However, I announced on 11 November at the college and university round-table meeting that I would encourage employers and unions to consider jointly the pros and cons of national collective bargaining for the sector as a whole. All parties are aware that the matter is ultimately for colleges as employers, and an immediate resolution is not expected, but my initiative has been welcomed by college staff unions and the convener of the principals forum of the Association of Scotland's Colleges as an opportunity for informed dialogue.

Cathie Craigie:

I welcome the cabinet secretary's intention to establish talks. Does she agree that it is wrong that our lecturers' salaries and conditions are subject to a postcode lottery? Will she undertake to work with staff and unions to explore a proper national salary structure and a collective national bargaining system for lecturers in Scotland's colleges? She appears to support such a system. What timescale has been set to undertake such discussions and explore all the options?

Fiona Hyslop:

If Cathie Craigie reflects on my answer to her first question, she will see that I not only support but have initiated such dialogue. It is clear that the benefits and disbenefits must be resolved and discussed. One clear issue is the time and effort that all colleges spend on negotiating and reaching individual settlements, but flexibility has advantages. In Aberdeen, for example, general salary levels are quite high in comparison with the rest of the country so Aberdeen College needs flexibility to recruit the staff that it needs.

Fleshing out the pros and cons is important. Some college principals support a national structure, but a significant number oppose it. Useful dialogue will allow us to address the issues, and I have offered to facilitate a session in the spring to bring together all the agencies. I have been pleased by the reaction of principals and unions, which are also finding ways to have such discussions without the Government interfering.

I will make an important point. To help preserve the charitable status of colleges, the previous Administration took away ministers' powers to intervene directly in colleges. I will be at pains to ensure that I do nothing to jeopardise that position. I hope that Cathie Craigie understands the restrictions under which I work. I have tried to be constructive in encouraging discussions.


Primary Schools (Class Sizes)

To ask the Scottish Executive what progress has been made on its commitment to work with local authorities to promote lower class sizes in primary schools. (S3O-5827)

The Cabinet Secretary for Education and Lifelong Learning (Fiona Hyslop):

Under the concordat, local government has agreed to make year-on-year progress to reduce primary 1 to 3 class sizes to a maximum of 18. Sufficient funding has been provided to local government to maintain teacher numbers at 2007 levels which, at a time of falling school rolls, provides headroom to make progress on the joint commitment. Some authorities are making better progress than others.

Bob Doris:

I draw the cabinet secretary's attention to Glasgow City Council's proposal to close 25 primary and nursery schools in the city and, in particular, its proposal for St Agnes's primary school in Cadder. The school has seven classes, none of which is a composite, and an average class size of 21. The council proposes to merge St Agnes's with, and move its pupils to, St Blane's primary school in Summerston, where the new school will have an average class size of 25. What representations does the cabinet secretary make to local authorities—and Glasgow City Council in particular—to ensure that they are on board with and do not fly in the face of the Government policy to lower class sizes in P1 to P3?

Fiona Hyslop:

I understand the member's question, but I hope that he appreciates that I cannot comment on individual schools or on Glasgow City Council's programme, which is the council's responsibility.

In Glasgow, 318 teaching posts have been lost. That represents an opportunity lost to Glasgow City Council to cut class sizes by replacing those teachers. It is for the council to manage its resources, but I am aware that Gordon Matheson, the council's executive member for education, said in May 2008 that

"Education's budget in Glasgow, in real terms, will be higher next year than it is this year."

It is clear that the resources are available to maintain teacher numbers and that the council must manage its estate accordingly. If authorities do not use such a chance to reduce class sizes, that is a missed opportunity.

It is regrettable that Glasgow, which has one of the poorest levels of attainment—yes, it has challenges—also has one of the lowest levels of expenditure on education. That is a choice that the council makes.

Malcolm Chisholm (Edinburgh North and Leith) (Lab):

The cabinet secretary welcomed this week's statement by Councillor Marilyne MacLaren that there would be no further cuts to devolved school budgets in Edinburgh, but does she realise that there will still be significant reductions in education expenditure, including fewer teachers next year? How can we have smaller class sizes and fewer teachers?

Fiona Hyslop:

Malcolm Chisholm should pay close attention to the budget-setting discussions that will take place in the City of Edinburgh Council. It would be extremely surprising if there were reductions in the education budgets, and he should think carefully before making such accusations.

Education spend in Edinburgh is a matter for the council. Malcolm Chisholm would be best to engage with the council and, when the budget is set, pay attention to the levels of that spend. I do not anticipate any reduction in it. Indeed, in my answer to Wendy Alexander, I indicated that, in their provisional outturns, local authorities estimated a 5.5 per cent increase in the current year's budget. We can examine projections for next year as we move forward.


Skills Development Scotland

To ask the Scottish Executive how Skills Development Scotland is performing in relation to its key performance indicators for 2008-09. (S3O-5760)

Skills Development Scotland reports monthly on performance against the key performance indicators—KPIs—that are included in its 2008-09 operating plan. At the end of January 2009, SDS reported good progress against all KPIs.

John Wilson:

What support are workers who have recently been made redundant being offered, especially through the European social fund, to retrain for alternative employment? Will the minister comment on United Kingdom Government restrictions on providing training assistance to people who have been unemployed for less than six months?

Maureen Watt:

No UK or other legislation prevents people from accessing training until they have been unemployed for six months. Skills are devolved to the Scottish Government and, as such, decisions on skills training offers are its responsibility. From 1 April 2009, training for work will be available to people who have been unemployed for three months or more, and all training interventions will be considered in the light of the economic downturn.

On the European social fund, £55 million has been allocated to community planning partnerships to enable them to undertake employability and regeneration projects over the next two years.


Teachers (Protection from Violence)

To ask the Scottish Executive what steps it is taking to protect teachers from violence in schools. (S3O-5795)

The Minister for Schools and Skills (Maureen Watt):

Any violence in schools is unacceptable. The Scottish Government is committed to helping schools to create peaceful and positive learning environments for staff and pupils and is working to tackle indiscipline and violence in schools in a variety of ways. We are working with local authorities to support schools in introducing the most effective approaches to promoting positive behaviour and dealing with indiscipline and more serious incidents. We fund the positive behaviour team at £500,000 per year; it provides free training and promotes good practice throughout Scotland.

Andy Kerr:

I share the minister's concerns. The most recent figures are shocking: there was a 28 per cent increase in assaults with weapons in Scottish schools, which Ronnie Smith, the general secretary of the Educational Institute of Scotland described as "shocking" and

"a real cause for concern".

I find a cause for concern in the minister's answer, which had warm words but nothing that would enable us to monitor the success of any Government intervention. What further action can be taken to make a difference in classrooms and allow us to monitor a clearly unacceptable situation?

Maureen Watt:

Andy Kerr will know that, this month, the Government will start a survey on bad behaviour is schools. I repeat that any violence in schools in unacceptable, and I am concerned by any rise in exclusions because of assaults, which is a very serious problem. Although they account for less than 1 per cent of exclusions, they represent some of the most serious incidents. That is why schools use a wide range of approaches to improve relationships and promote positive behaviour.


Physical Education

To ask the Scottish Executive what steps are being taken to ensure that every primary school pupil receives two hours of high-quality physical education per week. (S3O-5813)

The Minister for Schools and Skills (Maureen Watt):

Physical education is a key element of the health and wellbeing area of the curriculum. Guidance to support the new three-to-18 curriculum explicitly refers to our commitment that all schools will continue to work towards the provision of two hours of good-quality physical education for each child every week. The health and wellbeing experiences and outcomes are being redrafted to take account of feedback from trialling, and I expect the final version to be published in time for schools to begin introducing the new curriculum from August this year, with full implementation by August 2010.

Dr Simpson:

It has become clear to the Health and Sport Committee in its current investigation into pathways into sport that, in too many schools, two hours of physical education are not being delivered, never mind at a high quality. How does the Government assess levels of physical literacy for primary 4 to 7 pupils? What steps will be taken to ensure that the physical literacy of individual pupils is measured with the same emphasis as numeracy and literacy?

I assure the member that I am sure that the outcomes for the health and wellbeing part of the curriculum for excellence will include means of measuring those outcomes for children's learning.


Europe, External Affairs and Culture


European Policy (Representations)

To ask the Scottish Executive how it makes representations on its views on European policy matters that impact on Scotland. (S3O-5854)

The Minister for Europe, External Affairs and Culture (Linda Fabiani):

The Scottish Government uses various methods to make representations on European policy matters that affect Scotland. For instance, we regularly meet European commissioners and respond to their consultations, we attend meetings of the European Council, and we brief MEPs. We also remain in regular contact with our Whitehall counterparts to promote Scottish interests in the establishment of the United Kingdom's position.

Hugh O’Donnell:

Doubtless the minister will be aware that the ratification is pending of a preferential trade agreement between the European Union and the state of Israel. In light of events in the middle east, will the Government make representations to the EU and the European Parliament about the validity of endorsing that trade agreement at this stage?

Linda Fabiani:

I presume that we are discussing the EU-Israel association agreement, which sets out the framework for interaction between the EU and Israel on issues such as the economy, trade, security and diplomatic relations.

Article 2 of the agreement states:

"Relations between the Parties, as well as all the provisions of the Agreement itself, shall be based on respect for human rights and democratic principles".

I know that a colleague of Mr O'Donnell's in the House of Lords, Baroness Tonge, has asked Lord Malloch-Brown about the conditionality clauses in the agreement and about what discussions have taken place.

Of course, as things stand, Scotland is not involved in the negotiation of EU association agreements. If Scotland were an independent member state, it would be in a far better position to consider the balance between promoting trade and diplomatic relations, and making progress on wider political and human rights issues.

How is the Scottish Government using EU funds to aid the Scottish economy?

Linda Fabiani:

We are front loading spending on our European structural funds programmes and have already awarded approximately £200 million to almost 300 projects. Eighteen businesses accepted regional selective assistance of more than £16 million in the three months to the end of December, creating or safeguarding more than 1,300 jobs. The First Minister met European Commission representatives on 27 January to discuss Scotland's role in the energy projects that are being discussed in Brussels in relation to urgent EU funding.

I could say plenty more on the subject, Presiding Officer, but I suspect that you do not want me to.

Very wise.

Irene Oldfather (Cunninghame South) (Lab):

The minister will no doubt be aware of the co-operation agreement on a range of policy and trade areas that the European Commission and Chinese Government signed recently. Has she made representations to the UK Government or European Commission on how Scotland could benefit from or support the initiative? Does she plan to raise the matter at the next meeting of the joint ministerial committee on Europe, which I believe is to be held in March?

Linda Fabiani:

I have to hold my hands up on this one: I cannot give Irene Oldfather any detail on the matter. As she knows, we have our China plan, which is part of our international framework. We are serious about our relationship with China on trade, education and business. She also knows that the First Minister and the Cabinet Secretary for Education and Lifelong Learning will visit China shortly to promote Scotland's interests.

We have always said that we will do the best that we can in the interests of Scotland. We deal with the United Kingdom Government and have many constructive discussions on many issues. I am more than happy to give full details to Irene Oldfather in her position as convener of the European and External Relations Committee.

Margo MacDonald (Lothians) (Ind):

Will the minister outline the Government's approach to European energy policy now that it is interesting and important, not only in terms of energy supply but in relation to the politics of eastern and western Europe? Is she satisfied that we have the correct level of representation at policy-making level?

Linda Fabiani:

The Government is not satisfied that we have the right level of engagement with the European Union. It is clear that, as an independent state in the European Union, our voice would be heard more strongly. However, we are aware of opportunities in the European Union, one example of which is the proposed list of projects that would benefit from European core funding. Those in the energy sector relate to infrastructure projects, carbon capture and storage and the development of offshore wind power. We are talking to the UK Government on how the various EU and UK funding streams might mesh. Those discussions will continue, as will discussions with our counterparts in Europe and all the relevant agencies. We will ensure that we best represent Scotland and Scotland's interests.


Europe (Training Partnerships)

What progress has been made in developing technical and training partnerships with European advanced regions such as the four motors for Europe, which are known to be interested in establishing links with Scotland. (S3O-5832)

The Minister for Europe, External Affairs and Culture (Linda Fabiani):

We are already involved in a number of partnerships that involve the members and associate members of the four motors for Europe, including the districts of creativity and the creativity world forum. The Scottish Government seeks to work with European partners where there is scope to collaborate in a specific policy area or where we can share policy experiences.

Christopher Harvie:

Given that it is often the case that regions such as the four motors for Europe and other bodies have the main responsibility for the environment and research, does the minister see the possibility of a two-track future in which national diplomacy is supplemented by co-operation on areas such as renewables and other energy issues, culture and education?

Linda Fabiani:

As I stated, we always seek to work with partners across Europe on a wide variety of topics when there is clear benefit in doing so. The most recent example is the agreement that the First Minister reached with the Catalan Government to work to achieve a lasting legacy from the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth games.

My colleague Jim Mather has visited Lombardy for talks on energy, and the minister with responsibility for research and universities in Baden-Württemberg has visited Edinburgh for discussions on renewable energy. We are also looking at the ways in which we might co-operate on a range of areas with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology and the Government of Baden-Württemberg. I thank Chris Harvie for the assistance that he has given Fiona Hyslop and me in that regard.


Gaza (Aid)

To ask the Scottish Executive what progress is being made regarding its commitment to provide humanitarian aid for the people of Gaza. (S3O-5829)

The Minister for Europe, External Affairs and Culture (Linda Fabiani):

On Tuesday 27 January, I met representatives of Scotland-based organisations and the Disasters Emergency Committee Scotland to hear at first hand about their work and to discuss how best the Scottish Government can assist them.

We have received funding bids from Scotland-based organisations to support their humanitarian work in Gaza. We will assess all those applications as quickly as possible to ensure that funds can be released and made available as a matter of urgency to assist people on the ground. As the Deputy First Minister confirmed, the national health service in Scotland is ready to help civilians affected by the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

Kenneth Gibson:

Does the minister agree that it is vital to ensure that such aid reaches those who are most desperately in need? Can she advise the chamber of the safeguards that are in place to ensure that that happens? What humanitarian assistance is the Scottish Government providing to other areas of conflict in the world at this time, such as the Congo and Sri Lanka?

Linda Fabiani:

I wish that we could guarantee absolutely that the border will be open and that the aid will get through to the right people. However, the agencies with which we are working—from the largest, such as Islamic Relief Scotland and Oxfam Scotland, right down to smaller agencies such as Edinburgh Direct Aid and Glasgow the Caring City—have vast experience in that regard. We will look at what they put in front of us in their applications and we will judge, on the basis of their expertise, the most effective way of getting aid in.

Kenneth Gibson asked about the assistance that we are providing to other areas affected by humanitarian crises. Parliament may remember that the previous Administration gave aid to Sri Lanka and Pakistan. In the past year or so, we have given aid to Darfur. I am currently considering applications to the humanitarian aid fund for the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Question 4 was not lodged.


Gaza (Aid)

To ask the Scottish Executive what support it is providing to Scottish charities that are assisting the humanitarian response to the situation in Gaza. (S3O-5860)

The Minister for Europe, External Affairs and Culture (Linda Fabiani):

As I mentioned in my reply to Kenneth Gibson's question, I have met representatives of Scotland-based aid organisations. I am hugely impressed both by the response, knowledge and expertise of agencies based in Scotland and by the response of the public, not least members, to the crisis in Gaza. Today Pauline McNeill co-ordinated some work with Edinburgh Direct Aid; I know that Roseanna Cunningham, Kenneth Gibson and many others have helped with that appeal. That is a mark of a caring Scotland.

Nicol Stephen:

The fact that two out of the first four questions to the minister this afternoon relate to Gaza shows the strength of feeling in all parties on the issue. I am pleased that she has met representatives of the Disasters Emergency Committee. It is just over a week since the appeal was launched, and more than £250,000 has already been raised from Scotland alone.

There are strong feelings on the issue. Does the minister share the shock of many at the BBC's refusal to broadcast the Disasters Emergency Committee's humanitarian appeal for Gaza? Does she agree that people in Gaza, including thousands of helpless children, are in dire need of aid and deserve to have the support of everyone in the United Kingdom? Will she and the Scottish Government continue to do all that they can to publicise and support the work of Scottish charities in Gaza? Will she confirm how much funding the Scottish Government intends to allocate to the various bids that she has received?

Linda Fabiani:

All members recognise that humanitarian aid should always be focused on the people who need it. The First Minister has issued a call to the BBC to rethink its decision not to broadcast the appeal for Gaza. As Nicol Stephen pointed out, it is admirable how much money has been raised despite the BBC's decision not to broadcast the appeal.

Nicol Stephen asked how much funding the Scottish Government will give to Gaza. We have received applications and will consider them; I hope to be able to make an announcement on the issue fairly soon. However, when we consider appeals such as those for Gaza and the Congo, it is not simply a matter of our donating a certain amount of money. The important point is that the aid is effective. It is up to the experts who work in Scotland and in our aid agencies to come to us and tell us how money can best be used. It is also a matter of complementing other work that is already going on. For example, as everyone knows, we work very closely with the Department for International Development to ensure that projects work well together.

Pauline McNeill (Glasgow Kelvin) (Lab):

I welcome what the minister has said in support of the efforts of Edinburgh Direct Aid and the convoy to Gaza. The truck outside the Scottish Parliament today is there partly to acknowledge the work that MSPs, including Wendy Alexander and Roseanna Cunningham, have done, which is to be commended. The minister told us that she could not be there for the photo call, but I know that she would have attended if she could.

Is the minister aware of the difficulties in getting aid into Gaza, given the announcement of the closing of the border at Rafah today?

I acknowledge and welcome the Government's approach to the humanitarian response to the situation in Gaza, but how quickly might it be possible to respond to the applications for aid that have been made? Will the minister assure me that she will seriously consider allocating funds to smaller organisations, such as Edinburgh Direct Aid and Glasgow the Caring City, to name but two?

Linda Fabiani:

I echo Pauline McNeill's concerns about the border closing. John Wilson brought me up to date on the matter a short while ago—as Pauline McNeill has always done in relation to the current situation.

When I met representatives of non-governmental organisations, I met not just those from the larger organisations that form part of the Disasters Emergency Committee, as Edinburgh Direct Aid was also represented. It was not possible for anyone from Glasgow the Caring City to be present, because they were working very hard on something else on the same day.

I can give an assurance that serious consideration is given to every application that is received. We are working on the applications at the moment so that we can assist as quickly as possible.


Homecoming 2009 (Dumfries and Galloway)

To ask the Scottish Executive what role the Minister for Europe, External Affairs and Culture's directorate will play in ensuring that there is a cultural legacy for Dumfries and Galloway from homecoming Scotland 2009. (S3O-5808)

The Minister for Europe, External Affairs and Culture (Linda Fabiani):

As Elaine Murray knows, Dumfries and Galloway's homecoming on your doorstep programme is supported by the local council and the Scottish Government. The programme offers a fantastic range of events across the region throughout the year, engaging communities, boosting tourism and working for the benefit of all.

I had a great time down at Dumfries and Galloway's opening celebration, Burns light, and I had a very constructive meeting with the local authority while I was there, at which the council outlined its plans for developing a sustainable legacy for its area.

Elaine Murray:

I hope that the minister and her colleagues enjoyed being guests at the homecoming event in Dumfries on the 250th anniversary of the birth of Robert Burns. Burns lived in Dumfries for the last eight years of his life, and he frequently attended the Theatre Royal. Does the minister share my concerns that theatre provision in Dumfries is now far from adequate? Will it be possible to apply the £60 million town centre turnaround fund, which was announced during the budget process and was welcomed throughout the chamber, to cultural regeneration projects?

Linda Fabiani:

The issue of the Theatre Royal has been raised with me by councillors from Dumfries, and the local council recognises the need for improved performing arts facilities in Dumfries and Galloway. The council is working with all partners to find a sustainable solution.

The Scottish Arts Council had pledged support for the Dumfries Theatre Royal Trust, with lottery funding of £1.7 million, back in March 2005. Sadly, the project fell though. The Scottish Arts Council and Historic Scotland have been kept fully informed of activities, and they both fed into the recent workshop day, at which performing arts provision for the region was considered.

On the regeneration fund that has been announced—I say this in the spirit of consensus—Mr Swinney, who is heading up the fund, will discuss with others how it should best move forward, as he has pledged to do.


Scottish Mining Museum

To ask the Scottish Executive whether it recognises the national importance of the Scottish mining museum. (S3O-5781)

The Minister for Europe, External Affairs and Culture (Linda Fabiani):

The Scottish Government fully recognises the importance of museums and collections the length and breadth of Scotland, from the Pier arts centre in Orkney to the archaeology collection in Dumfries and Galloway. Scotland is blessed with so many local museums, with collections that both reflect local heritage and are of national and international importance. Local authorities that fund such museums should be commended.

The Scottish mining museum is just one of 33 collections that have been awarded the status of a recognised collection of national significance under the Scottish Government's recognition scheme, which is run by Museums Galleries Scotland.

Rhona Brankin:

I thank the minister for that reply, albeit that her view on our national mining museum's importance is rather disappointing. The Scottish mining museum is a great success for Midlothian and for Scotland. As members know, the museum is Europe's best preserved 19th century pit complex and is a five-star attraction that is attracting ever increasing visitor numbers even in the current economic climate.

What steps will the Scottish Government take to provide the capital funding that is needed to secure the buildings for future generations? Will the Government undertake to provide revenue funding on a par with the big pit museum in Wales, whose revenue grant of almost £2 million a year is nearly 10 times the grant that the Scottish mining museum receives?

Linda Fabiani:

I recently had a very constructive meeting with the museum's chair, Mr Henry McLeish. We discussed the on-going review of the business plan for the museum. When that is complete, we will continue our discussions with the museum, which have been going on for many months. The Government has already helped the mining museum and the other industrial museums with capital funding—to a level unmatched, I believe, by previous capital allocations. Revenue funding is, of course, a matter for Museums Galleries Scotland.