Official Report 155KB pdf
Special Waste Amendment (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2004<br />(SSI 2004/204)
We move to agenda item 2. The regulations have been considered by the Subordinate Legislation Committee, which had no comments to make on them. The regulations amend the principal regulations in response to concerns that were raised by the Subordinate Legislation Committee. Do I take it that members have no comments on the regulations?
The amount of stuff that is appended to these regulations, which are just two lines long, is astonishing. Is it absolutely necessary to print off all this stuff?
If it was not there, you would complain.
Would I? I doubt it.
I suppose we could ask the clerks to take a quick look over an instrument when no concerns have been raised by the Subordinate Legislation Committee. However, on strange occasions in the past, colleagues on this committee have actually noted errors in subordinate legislation—I remember Maureen Macmillan and Nora Radcliffe spotting things in the past. It is a matter of getting the balance right between effective scrutiny and letting things slide through.
The minister's name is wrongly spelt.
There you go. That just proves it.
Does that mean that there will have to be another set of regulations to amend these regulations?
I am sure that that can be done through a manuscript amendment.
Joking aside, the point that Rob Gibson has highlighted is an important one. If the draftsmen cannot get the minister's name right, that hardly inspires confidence in other areas.
On this occasion, the regulations were produced to amend other regulations. We will keep an eye on the detail. Thank you, colleagues.
Meeting continued in private until 12:24.
Previous
Organic Action Plan