- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 19 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 27 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government how many Local Development Plans have been rejected during the evidence report gate check stage to date, and for what reasons.
Answer
The following table lists the 12 insufficient evidence reports that have been returned to date.
Case Reference | Authority | Case Reporter | Date of Decision | Decision Description |
GATE-400-1 | West Lothian Council | Katrina Rice | 07-Nov-25 | Evidence Report Insufficient |
GATE-200-2 | East Dunbartonshire Council | Alison Kirkwood | 05-Nov-25 | Evidence Report Insufficient |
GATE-100-1 | Aberdeen City Council | Claire Milne | 23-Oct-25 | Evidence Report Insufficient |
GATE-330-1 | Orkney Islands Council | Stephen Hall | 30-Sep-25 | Evidence Report Insufficient |
GATE-110-1 | Aberdeenshire Council | Allison Coard | 23-Sep-25 | Evidence Report Insufficient |
GATE-250-2 | Fife Council | Allison Coard | 18-Sep-25 | Evidence Report Insufficient |
GATE-280-1 | Inverclyde Council | Claire Milne | 17-Jul-25 | Evidence Report Insufficient |
GATE-340-1 | Perth and Kinross Council | Stephen Hall | 08-Jul-25 | Evidence Report Insufficient |
GATE-210-2 | East Lothian Council | Katrina Rice | 01-Apr-25 | Evidence Report Insufficient |
GATE-170-1 | Dumfries and Galloway Council | Alison Kirkwood | 01-Apr-25 | Evidence Report Insufficient |
GATE-260-1 | Glasgow City Council | Alison Kirkwood | 19-Sep-24 | Evidence Report Insufficient |
GATE-250-1 | Fife Council | Allison Coard | 19-Jul-24 | Evidence Report Insufficient |
Links to the decision notice and reporters recommendations detailing full reasons for all insufficient gate checks can be found on the Scottish Government’s Planning and Environmental Appeals Division webpage at: Scottish Government - Planning and Environmental Appeals Division (DPEA) by searching on the case reference number.
- Asked by: Sandesh Gulhane, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Monday, 19 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 27 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government how the estimated £149 million required for the new pay offer for resident doctors will be funded, and whether funding will be reduced in any other area in order to pay for the offer, in the event that it is agreed.
Answer
The Scottish Government welcomes the BMA’s decision to call off industrial action following intensive and constructive talks. This has prevented the cancellation of operations and disruption to patient care. The 2026-27 budget provides for pay deals including for resident doctors. The final cost will be managed within the overall Scottish Government budget in recognition of our support for resident doctors through offering the same pay deal which nurses and NHS support staff accepted, including additional investment in contractual reform over the two year period it covers.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 16 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 27 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether the Cabinet Secretary for Climate Action and Energy retains any role in the oversight of officials within the Energy Consents Unit following the transfer of responsibility for Electricity Act 1989 consents to the Minister for Public Finance.
Answer
The Minister for Public Finance has assumed responsibility for determining the granting of consents for energy projects, alongside his other responsibilities with regard to planning. Oversight of other work conducted by the Energy Consents Unit remains my responsibility.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 16 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 27 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether any objections were raised by officials during the process of transferring responsibility for Electricity Act 1989 consents to the Minister for Public Finance and, if so, at what level.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-43110 on 27 January 2026. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 16 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 27 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government how it will ensure that the transfer of responsibility for Electricity Act 1989 consents to the Minister for Public Finance does not impact transparency and public confidence in the consent process.
Answer
The full grounds for Scottish Ministers' decisions are set out in the decision letter which is publicly available online on the Energy Consents Unit portal. There are no plans to change this approach.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 16 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 27 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether the current national procurement framework for continence products allows for clinical exception where a patient's specific medical condition requires a higher grade of product than is available on the standard board-approved list.
Answer
Products are supplied via the NHS National Services National Procurement Framework NP57123. The framework provides a range of products for the bladder and bowel and is not a limiting factor to local health board formularies/availability.
Clinical leads can review when assessing patients’ needs and are able to prescribe the appropriate product based on clinical need, and subject to local health board governance.
Health Boards have published their own guidance material on bladder and bowel health, which provides detail on how these arrangements can be managed.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 16 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 27 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what the scope of any legal advice sought was in relation to the transfer of responsibility for Electricity Act 1989 consents to the Minister for Public Finance.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-43127 on 27 January 2026. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 16 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 27 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether it sought legal advice in advance of the transfer of responsibility for Electricity Act 1989 consents to the Minister for Public Finance on 18 December 2025.
Answer
The allocation of ministerial portfolios and responsibilities is a matter for the First Minister.
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 16 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 27 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will confirm the total number of existing (a) residential, (b) commercial and (c) industrial properties that are considered at risk of flooding, based on SEPA's use of the Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 emissions scenario, broken down by local authority area.
Answer
SEPA recently completed an update to their National Flood Risk Assessment. This was summarised in their December 2025 National Flood Risk Assessment 2025 report.
The report includes data on the number of properties at risk in a medium risk current day scenario* and the number of properties at risk in 2100 under a medium risk climate change scenario**. These are broken down by local authority and residential/non residential properties in Table B, rather than split by property type. Local authority distribution of flood risk in the appendix of the report. A subset of relevant data from that table is replicated below.
SEPA plan to publish more detailed data in March 2026.
Local Authority | Total Properties at Risk | Residential | Non-Residential | % of Total Properties at Risk | Properties at Risk by 2100 |
Aberdeen City | 20400 | 18200 | 2200 | 15 | 31400 |
Aberdeenshire | 19800 | 13000 | 6800 | 11 | 29100 |
Angus | 6600 | 4300 | 2300 | 9 | 11500 |
Argyll & Bute | 12200 | 8200 | 4000 | 18 | 17700 |
City of Edinburgh | 39100 | 36500 | 2600 | 14 | 64500 |
Clackmannanshire | 5100 | 4500 | 600 | 18 | 7500 |
Comhairle nan Eilean Siar | 1700 | 1300 | 500 | 9 | 3100 |
Dumfries & Galloway | 19500 | 11600 | 7900 | 17 | 27200 |
Dundee City | 8600 | 7400 | 1300 | 10 | 13900 |
East Ayrshire | 8300 | 6400 | 1900 | 12 | 12500 |
East Dunbartonshire | 5700 | 5000 | 700 | 11 | 8800 |
East Lothian | 7800 | 6200 | 1600 | 12 | 12400 |
East Renfrewshire | 4600 | 4200 | 400 | 10 | 6700 |
Falkirk | 10000 | 7800 | 2200 | 12 | 18900 |
Fife | 18700 | 14800 | 3900 | 9 | 29500 |
Glasgow City | 52900 | 49100 | 3800 | 15 | 82000 |
Highland | 20600 | 13600 | 7100 | 12 | 37000 |
Inverclyde | 6300 | 5500 | 800 | 15 | 10200 |
Midlothian | 4300 | 3600 | 700 | 9 | 7200 |
Moray | 7900 | 4800 | 3200 | 13 | 13600 |
North Ayrshire | 8700 | 7100 | 1600 | 10 | 14700 |
North Lanarkshire | 18900 | 16500 | 2300 | 11 | 30100 |
Orkney | 2200 | 1500 | 800 | 13 | 3500 |
Perth & Kinross | 12700 | 8400 | 4300 | 13 | 20800 |
Renfrewshire | 11600 | 10400 | 1200 | 12 | 19100 |
Scottish Borders | 14700 | 9500 | 5200 | 17 | 20200 |
Shetland | 1100 | 600 | 500 | 7 | 1700 |
South Ayrshire | 7000 | 5200 | 1900 | 10 | 12300 |
South Lanarkshire | 18600 | 15400 | 3200 | 10 | 29100 |
Stirling | 7500 | 5600 | 1900 | 14 | 12900 |
West Dunbartonshire | 8400 | 7300 | 1100 | 17 | 11900 |
West Lothian | 7800 | 6500 | 1300 | 8 | 13400 |
| | | | | | |
* defined as areas with more than 0.5% chance of flooding each year
** The climate change scenario is based on SEPA's future flood maps which use a variety of climate change scenarios including the Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 emissions scenario (UKCP18) and scenarios from UKCP09. More details about SEPA's future flood maps and the scenarios used can be found in National Flood Risk Assessment 2025 and future-flood-maps-summary_v4.pdf.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 16 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 27 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government how accountability for Electricity Act 1989 consent decisions will be assigned where responsibilities span over more than one ministerial portfolio.
Answer
Paragraph 1.4(d) of the Scottish Ministerial Code makes clear that holders of public office are accountable for their decisions and actions. This operates alongside the principle of collective responsibility, set out at paragraph 2.1, whereby decisions reached by the Scottish Ministers, individually or collectively, are binding on all members of the Government.