- Asked by: Russell Findlay, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 10 September 2026
Question to be taken in Chamber.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 10 September 2026
- Asked by: Malcolm Offord, MSP for West Scotland, Reform UK
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 10 September 2026
Question to be taken in Chamber.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 10 September 2026
- Asked by: Gillian Mackay, MSP for Central Scot and Lothians West, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 10 September 2026
Question to be taken in Chamber.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 10 September 2026
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 10 September 2026
Question to be taken in Chamber.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 10 September 2026
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh North Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 10 September 2026
Question to be taken in Chamber.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 10 September 2026
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 24 August 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hannah Mary Goodlad on 8 September 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what constitutes "adequate marketing" under Historic Environment Scotland’s guidelines before a listed building can be demolished on the grounds that its retention is not economically viable; and whether it considers a failure to actively market a site for facade retention or alternative development models for several years as meeting this evidentiary threshold.
Answer
Interpretation and application of Historic Environment Scotland’s non-statutory guidance is a matter for Historic Environment Scotland. Decisions on whether sufficient evidence has been provided in support of an application, including evidence relating to marketing and economic viability, are considered on a case-by-case basis by the decision maker having regard to the circumstances of the application.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 24 August 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hannah Mary Goodlad on 8 September 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what guidance it provides to local authorities to ensure that alternative regeneration models, such as partnerships with registered social landlords or housing associations/trusts/cooperatives, are fully exhausted before granting consent for the demolition of a listed building on the grounds of private commercial unviability.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not provide guidance requiring specific regeneration models or ownership arrangements to be exhausted before consent is granted for the demolition of a listed building. It is for planning authorities to assess each case on its merits, taking account of the evidence provided and the specific circumstances of the application.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 24 August 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hannah Mary Goodlad on 8 September 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what criteria it uses to determine when the proposed demolition of a listed building transitions from a localised planning dispute to a "significant issue for planning policy" warranting a ministerial call-in under section 46(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997.
Answer
Ministers consider the need for call-in on a case-by-case basis, taking account of the specific individual circumstances. They use their powers under section 46(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 sparingly, recognising the important role of local planning authorities in decision making. As set out in the Ministerial statement on call-in, Ministers will generally consider intervention only where there may be some important issue at stake which should be determined at the national level.
- Asked by: Andrew Baxter, MSP for Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 21 August 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Siobhian Brown on 8 September 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of its duties under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Incorporation) (Scotland) Act 2024, what steps it is taking to ensure that all children whose welfare is the subject of social work involvement, and not only those who meet existing statutory gateways, have access to independent advocacy to support their right to be heard under Article 12 of the UNCRC.
Answer
The Scottish Government recognises that independent advocacy is highly valuable and may be the most appropriate form of support in some circumstances; however, it is not the only means through which children can be supported to have their views heard. Consistent with GIRFEC principles, many children may prefer, or have their needs best met through support from a parent, carer, family member or other trusted adult of their choosing. Children have different needs and preferences, and a single model of support will not be right for every child. The key consideration is that children are able to participate meaningfully and have their views given due weight in line with Article 12 of the UNCRC, rather than prescribing a single model of support for all children receiving social work services.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 24 August 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hannah Mary Goodlad on 8 September 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on the enforcement of National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) Policy 7 (Historic assets and places), specifically in circumstances where a developer cites private commercial targets, such as a 20% Profit on Cost (PoC) margin, as the primary justification for the demolition of a listed building rather than structural impossibility.
Answer
NPF4 forms part of the development plan and should be taken into account in planning decision making. It is for the decision-maker, normally local authorities, to interpret and apply policy 7 and other relevant policies, making decisions in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. Applications are considered on individual merits.