- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 17 July 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 7 August 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the announcement on 16 July 2024 regarding Phase 1 of the Small Vessel Replacement Programme, whether it will apply a social value weighting to the procurement procedure that is sufficient to ensure that the construction of the vessels is carried out in Scotland.
Answer
CMAL, as the procuring authority, has highlighted that Scottish public procurement regulations explicitly state that contracting authorities cannot artificially narrow competition by designing a procurement with the intention of unduly favouring, or disadvantaging, any particular economic operator. This means that CMAL cannot lawfully weight or design the contract requirements to favour Scottish shipyards or businesses. All candidates must be treated equally and fairly.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 18 July 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 7 August 2024
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason it has divided the Small Vessel
Replacement Programme into phases, and what its position is on whether a series
production approach for all vessels in the programme would (a) enable the
maximisation of any learning curve efficiencies and (b) incentivise capital
investment in shipyard productivity.
Answer
Careful consideration was given to the most efficient phasing of the Small Vessel Replacement Programme. This resulted in the current split with seven similar vessels procured in the first phase.
Phase two of the programme takes in other routes in the Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Service network where the service requirements differ from the seven vessels in phase one, including routes where specific requirements need to be addressed. CMAL will be commencing with studies and engagement on these vessels later this year.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 26 July 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kaukab Stewart on 7 August 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the potential impact on people in Scotland who are refugees, whether it has made representations to the UK Government to publish a national integration strategy that promotes more equal support for all displaced people and builds on learning across each of the four UK nations.
Answer
Scotland’s national refugee integration strategy has been in place for over a decade. In March 2024 the third New Scots refugee integration strategy was published. It is a UK-leading integration approach built on a partnership led by the Scottish Government, COSLA and Scottish Refugee Council. It was informed by an engagement process involving over 2,000 refugees and people seeking asylum. The strategy is accompanied by a delivery plan setting out the actions that New Scots partners will undertake to deliver the strategy. We hope that other governments can learn from our work.
Scottish Ministers have held introductory calls with their new UK Government counterparts and we look forward to working closely with the UK Government to support delivery of a more effective and humane asylum system and resettlement schemes. We are not aware of any plans, however, to publish a UK integration strategy.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 26 July 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kaukab Stewart on 7 August 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what steps it is taking to help displaced people across the private rented sector.
Answer
I refer the Member to the answer to question S6W-28627 on 31 July 2024.
All answers to Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/questions-and-answers .
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 July 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Natalie Don on 7 August 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-27078 Natalie Don on 9 May 2024, in which it indicated its expectation that data on the scale, uptake and delivery models of breakfast provision across Scotland, both at local authority and schools' level, would be submitted to the Scottish Government in June 2024, whether it has received this data, and, if this is not the case, what the reasons are for the delay in the data being provided, and when the Scottish Government will report on the next stages.
Answer
The Scottish Government has been working with AssistFM and Improvement Service to map existing breakfast provision across Scotland, including a survey to all primary and special schools to understand the scale and uptake of provision.
A report with the findings from the mapping exercise was submitted to the Scottish Government in June 2024. The findings are being used to inform the government’s approach and we will report any decisions made about next steps once the data has been fully considered.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 July 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 7 August 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding the advanced works for the dualling of the A9 between Tomatin and Moy, whether it will provide a detailed breakdown of the (a) total cost and (b) cost of any (i) preparatory work and (ii) consultancy fees for the creation of an ecological pond to accommodate a fly species.
Answer
Advance works to a cost of £22.6 million have been undertaken for the A9 Dualling: Tomatin to Moy project, to de-risk the main construction works contract.
This cost is broken down as follows:
A9 Dualling: Tomatin to Moy Advance Works | Final Cost |
Archaeological Investigation | £0.6m |
Tomatin Distillery Advance Worksand Local Road Improvements Project | £1.5m |
Ground Investigation Works 2016-2022 | £9.5m |
Network Rail Lynebeg Underbridge Advance Works | £10.5m |
Intelligent Transport System Advance Works (Variable Message Signs and CCTV) | £0.5m |
Total | £22.6m |
The figures above are exclusive of land acquisition costs and design fees.
The Lynbeg Railway Underbridge advance works contract included construction of a new ecological pond to support local ecology, including a nationally rare sub-species of the Caddisfly, which is encountered at only nine locations in the UK, including Lynebeg. The new ecological pond was constructed to meet the commitments set out in the Environmental Statement for the Tomatin to Moy project, specifically Mitigation Items P12 to W32 and P12 to E31, found on pages 21 to 42 and 21 to 50 of the Environmental Statement respectively. The new pond was constructed during the Lynebeg Railway Underbridge advance works contract to de-risk the programme impact on the main works contract.
The cost information available does not enable a breakdown of costs to be provided in the exact form requested.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 12 July 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 7 August 2024
To ask the Scottish Government by what date the MV (a) Isle of Islay and (b) Loch Indaal will be fully operational.
Answer
The planned in-service dates provided by CMAL in the June 2024 update to the NZET Committee were end November 2024 for MV Isle of Islay and end March 2025 for MV Loch Indaal.
Transport Scotland, CMAL and CalMac will keep these dates under review as the vessel builds progress. The dates will be subject to successful completion of construction, now entering the complex systems commissioning phases, and further crew familiarisation and berthing trails upon arrival in Scottish waters.
Further updates will be provided to Parliament in due course.
- Asked by: Oliver Mundell, MSP for Dumfriesshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 July 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 7 August 2024
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason additional grid capacity and infrastructure at Bearholm substation has reportedly been granted planning permission, in light of the Rivox and Scoop Hill Windfarm planning applications reportedly having not yet been determined.
Answer
The decision to grant planning permission for an extension to an existing substation at Bearholm near Moffat was made by the relevant planning authority, Dumfries and Galloway Council.
Planning authorities are required to determine any valid application submitted to them in accordance with the relevant local development plan and National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) unless there are material considerations which justify a departure from the plan. The decision notice of the authority is required to include the reasons for the decision. In addition, as part of the decision-making process the authority is required to produce a report setting out their consideration of the application and the material considerations taken into account. The decision notice and report are published on the planning authority’s website.
Applications for consent for the Rivox Wind Energy Hub and Scoop Hill Community Wind Farm projects are currently with the Scottish Ministers for determination under section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 10 July 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 7 August 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a breakdown of the reasons for the reported delays in completion of roadworks on the M8 Woodside Viaduct.
Answer
The work to undertake the temporary propping is extremely complex. Each of the 23 supports requires individual propping designs to take account of the varying column heights, span lengths and widths resulting in different loads to be supported by the props.
Additionally, the propping foundations are affected by a number of buried services, ground conditions and the SPT Subway tunnels beneath the viaducts, which has a major impact on the solutions available. There were also a number of public utilities diversions or protection measures required in agreement and partnership with the various utility owners.
The extent of the work on each support is, therefore, exceptionally difficult to quantify until it is underway.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 10 July 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 7 August 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a breakdown of any additional costs that have been accrued as a result of the reported delays to completion of roadworks on the M8 Woodside Viaduct.
Answer
The cost of the temporary propping, which is extremely complex, is expected to be between £126m - £152m. The cost is dependent on a number of factors, for example duration and extent of works. Our estimated cost range includes allowances for risk, contingency and inflation, which is standard industry practice for large infrastructure projects.