Skip to main content
Loading…
Chamber and committees

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Meeting date: Thursday, September 18, 2025


Contents


Subordinate Legislation


Winter Heating Assistance (Pension Age) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2025 [Draft]

The Deputy Convener

Agenda item 2 is consideration of a Scottish statutory instrument. As the instrument is subject to the affirmative procedure, the Parliament must approve it before it comes into force.

I welcome to the meeting the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice—good morning, cabinet secretary—and the following Scottish Government officials: Daniel Blaikie, who is a solicitor; Owen Allen, who is the winter benefits and Scottish welfare fund team leader; and Pamela Forsyth, who is the service manager of the carers support payment and common components branch. Thank you all for joining us today.

Following the evidence session, the committee will be invited under an upcoming agenda item to consider a motion to approve the instrument. I remind everyone that the Scottish Government officials can speak under this item, but not in the debate that will follow under the next agenda item.

I invite the cabinet secretary to make a short opening statement.

The Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice (Shirley-Anne Somerville)

Thank you, convener, and good morning.

The provisions that are laid out in the regulations will ensure that vital support is available to eligible pensioners with their fuel bills this winter. From this winter onwards, all pensioner households will typically receive £203.40 or £305.10, depending on their age, with the vast majority of people receiving the payment automatically.

We are in discussion with the United Kingdom Government to extend the proposed arrangements in England and Wales to recover payments from those pensioners with an individual income of more than £35,000 through the tax system. The tax charge will be brought forward through separate UK Government legislation, and it is our intention that the payment will be recovered automatically and that pensioners will not need to register with His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs for that or to take any further action.

The UK Government has set the income threshold at £35,000, which is broadly in line with average earnings. For this winter, HMRC was not able to deliver a different income threshold in Scotland, but it might be possible to introduce a different threshold in future years and we will consider the options that are available.

This will now be the largest single benefit to be delivered by Social Security Scotland since its inception, and it will require significant planning and resourcing. We are reliant on the Department for Work and Pensions to provide the data that is required for delivery; indeed, we are highly dependent on receiving high-quality data from the DWP and the Ministry of Defence in a timely manner to enable Social Security Scotland to carry out the required period of data assurance and to complete the household matching process to allow us to meet our target of beginning payments by the end of November. Although that will be a significant challenge for the agency, it has been working at pace to prepare for delivery and to ensure as smooth a transition as possible, and we are absolutely on track to start making those payments in November as planned.

As the committee will be aware, since the UK Government’s restriction of winter fuel payments eligibility in 2024, the Scottish Government has consistently acknowledged that other people of pensionable age might also face financial difficulties and would benefit from that support. For that reason, following the UK Government’s autumn budget in October 2024 and the confirmation of the associated budget in Scotland, we worked at pace to consider the options for delivering pension age winter heating payment in winter 2025-26, as well as the mitigations that might be available for winter 2024-25. Within the funding available, we decided that £100 payments for pensioners not in receipt of relevant benefits were affordable and would go some way towards supporting those households in meeting their heating bills through the winter.

On 6 June 2025, the Scottish Government laid regulations to introduce a universal pension-age winter heating payment from 2025-26 onwards.

Forgive me, convener, but I am choked with the cold. I am just going to have to stop and blow my nose a little bit.

Of course. Take your time, cabinet secretary.

Shirley-Anne Somerville

The joys of the start of the winter season.

On 9 June 2025, just three days after the regulations were laid, the UK Government announced its intention to expand the winter fuel payment in England and Wales to those with an income of £35,000 or less. Although that belated U-turn from the Prime Minister was welcome, it was disappointing that, yet again, Scottish ministers received no prior consultation on the UK Government’s decision.

As a result of the UK Government’s change in policy, the Scottish Fiscal Commission predicted that the associated block grant adjustment funding for the Scottish Government is expected to increase by £120 million. We considered carefully the importance of prioritising that additional funding for those who needed it most, and we decided to mirror the revised UK Government approach for our pension-age winter heating payment. Our approach will ensure that a higher level of support will be provided to those who are in most need, with more than 880,000 Scottish pensioners estimated to benefit from it.

The Scottish Fiscal Commission estimates that that will be a total investment of £187 million in 2025-26, providing a payment to around 1 million pensioners. It also estimates that around 16 per cent of the eligible pension-age population in Scotland will then have their payments recovered in 2025-26. That equates to around £30 million being recovered from 169,000 pensioners.

We recognise that households across the country feel acutely the twin pressures of rising energy costs and the cuts to social security budgets that have been made over many years by successive UK Governments. The regulations will provide important support to households, but it is not the only support that is available. There is also our winter heating payment and the child winter heating payment. Those benefits are available only in Scotland and provide reliable support to people who have an identified need for additional heat over the winter months, including low-income households and families with disabled children and young people. We continue to prioritise support with energy costs for the most vulnerable households through access to long-term and sustainable measures in our energy efficiency programmes.

I am immensely grateful to the members of the Scottish Commission on Social Security who have given their time to engage constructively with officials on the initial draft regulations that we shared with them in April and for agreeing to scrutinise the regulations before they were laid and after they were laid in draft. Wherever possible, we aim to give SCOSS sufficient time for scrutiny ahead of laying regulations but, in these circumstances, that has not been possible. SCOSS has now responded to our referral of the new pension-age winter heating payment amendment regulations, stating that it has no further comments.

Thank you for battling through that, cabinet secretary; it is appreciated. We move to questions from members.

Alexander Stewart (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con)

Good morning, cabinet secretary. In your opening statement, you talked about the negotiations that are taking place between you and the UK Government. Will you update the committee on the progress of the negotiations with the UK Government to recoup funds through the tax system? How will that work in practice for Social Security Scotland, and how will it be accounted for in the Scottish budget?

Shirley-Anne Somerville

The discussions with the UK Government are on-going, and I will update the committee once a final agreement has been reached with the Treasury. In essence, when it comes to recouping the funds, it is more about what happens with the block grant and the Scottish Government than with the agency. The agency will continue to deliver the benefit as planned.

Scottish Government officials continue to engage with their Treasury counterparts to develop the plan with a view to minimising the additional complexity and to looking at the operation of the fiscal framework. This is a new type of discussion that has not been entered into previously, but it is continuing at this point. As I say, once we have a conclusion, we will update the committee on the decisions that have been taken.

The Deputy Convener

The Scottish Government has ultimately mirrored the UK policy—albeit perhaps reluctantly—in moving from universal provision to means testing. I acknowledge that there are no up-front barriers to people receiving the income, which is important. What are the advantages of devolving winter fuel payments—noting that we are mirroring what is happening elsewhere in the UK?

Shirley-Anne Somerville

Let us consider winter payments in the round. In my introductory remarks, I mentioned in passing some of the differences that we have made. For example, the child winter heating payment does not exist in the rest of the UK. Also, our winter heating payment for low-income people is a guaranteed income, which is very different from what happens in the DWP system.

We have used the devolution of winter heating payments in the round to make different choices in those aspects. It is challenging if, while we attempt to move ahead with our policies, there is a handbrake turn from the UK Government on its policies, particularly if there are repercussions—as has been the case with some of the winter heating payments—for the Scottish Government’s in-year budget and not just for the future. That makes things challenging, and we have to bear that in mind as we make our decisions.

I hope that that gives a demonstration of the difference that we can make with devolved social security when it comes to the winter payments. It is still important to use those powers responsibly within our fixed budget and to make choices that we think will deliver support to pensioners, who are most likely to be struggling.

Jeremy Balfour joins us online.

Jeremy Balfour (Lothian) (Ind)

Good morning, cabinet secretary, and thank you for coming along. Regarding the regulations that would allow someone to opt out of receiving the payment and then opt back in again for the same year’s payment, how did you balance the administration costs of those provisions against the money that could potentially be saved through opt-outs?

Shirley-Anne Somerville

Mr Balfour raises an important point. Regarding the design of the benefit, it is important to consider the cost of the benefit not just in terms of what goes to individuals but in administrating it—and, indeed, the complexity of doing so. As we looked to design the benefit, we were mindful of the costs of administration.

We anticipate that the number of opt-outs will be relatively small. That means that the administrative cost of enabling people to opt out, if they choose to do so, and to opt back in again within the same year will be minimal in comparison with the overall value of the benefit. In essence, the system has been designed so that the opt-out and opt-in process is streamlined and is capable of being delivered within the existing structures. On that basis, the administration costs of the provisions are deemed to be proportionate, and the flexibility ensures that no eligible person is excluded from support should they later decide that they need it.

Mr Balfour raises an important test, and I am satisfied that we considered the cost of administration and the overall complexity of the benefit as the process was designed.

Jeremy Balfour

Thank you, cabinet secretary. That is helpful.

On a practical level, I think that you said in your opening statement that, if all the information is provided to Social Security Scotland on time, you hope to start making payments towards the end of November. In previous years, it was quite late into the next year before all the payments were made. What, in Social Security Scotland’s thinking, would be the timescale for the payments to be made? Would they start in November, and when would they finish, subject to all the information being provided to you?

Shirley-Anne Somerville

That is subject to what we get from the DWP—being given that information is what will allow us to function. With the caveat that we are reliant on that data and its quality, we expect to begin the payments by the end of November, as we have planned to do.

09:15  

The ambition is to have paid the majority of clients by the end of December this year. That reflects the DWP’s payments process, which is similar. We are ready to begin the process for those payments at the end of November, and the agency stands ready to receive the data from the DWP to allow data matching to continue. However, it is dependent on the quality of that data.

It is important to recognise that, although this is the first time that we have had the transfer of this data from the DWP to Social Security Scotland, there have been other data transfers in the past. Lessons learned exercises have been undertaken following those processes, because, sometimes, there has been a challenge in relation to the quality of data from the DWP, leading to further work and further manual intervention being required by Social Security Scotland. I hope that the committee is reassured that, following the experience of previous years, those lessons learned exercises have put in place an even better and more robust process for the DWP to be able to hand over high-quality data to the agency this year, to allow it to get on with its work.

The Deputy Convener

There are no further questions, so we move to agenda item 3, which is the formal consideration of motion S6M-17854.

Motion moved,

That the Social Justice and Social Security Committee recommends that the Winter Heating Assistance (Pension Age) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2025 [draft] be approved.—[Shirley-Anne Somerville]

Since no member wishes to contribute, cabinet secretary, do you wish to sum up in relation to this non-existent debate?

I have nothing to add, convener.

I am just making sure that we tick all the boxes.

Motion agreed to.

The Deputy Convener

The committee will report on the outcome of the instrument in due course. Are members content to delegate responsibility to me or to our convener, should she return, to publish a short factual report to the Parliament on this affirmative instrument?

Members indicated agreement.

The Deputy Convener

I thank the cabinet secretary and her officials for coming this morning. We will have a brief suspension to allow for a change of officials.

09:18 Meeting suspended.  

09:19 On resuming—  


Social Security (Cross-border Provision, Case Transfer and Miscellaneous Amendments) (Scotland) Regulations 2025 [Draft]

The Deputy Convener

Item 4 is consideration of another SSI. The instrument is subject to the affirmative procedure, which means that the Parliament must approve it before it comes into force.

I welcome back to the meeting the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice and welcome the following Scottish Government officials: Thomas Nicol, who is a lawyer; and Simon Coote, who is head of the cross-cutting policy unit. Thank you for joining us.

Following this evidence session, the committee will be invited under an upcoming agenda item to consider a motion to approve the instrument. I remind everyone that the Scottish Government officials can speak under this item, but not in the debate that will follow.

I invite the cabinet secretary to make a short opening statement.

Shirley-Anne Somerville

Thank you, convener. I welcome the opportunity to assist the committee in its consideration of the regulations. A key principle in the cross-border regulations is to ensure that, when case transfer is complete, individuals who move from the rest of the UK to Scotland, while in receipt of an equivalent reserved benefit, are able to do so without a gap in their entitlement.

Our intention had been for the cross-border process to mirror case transfer, so that awards could be transferred automatically from the DWP to Social Security Scotland, without the need for the client to submit a new application. Despite our best efforts, that has not proved to be possible, because the DWP was unable to commit to the required data-sharing arrangements. That means that individuals who move to Scotland will be required to submit a new application for Scottish benefits. That will ensure that we have the most up-to-date information when deciding on an award and minimise the need for the client to undergo an unscheduled review soon after the decision. It also future proofs our approach if there is further divergence between our benefits and the UK equivalents.

Our focus has been on making that application journey as easy as possible for the estimated 300 people per month that we expect to apply across all benefits. The DWP will continue to pay clients for 13 weeks after they move to Scotland, and those clients can apply for the equivalent Scottish benefit while they are still in receipt of their DWP benefit.

The regulations make specific amendments to support carer support payment by allowing entitlement to start on a future date if the client is not eligible on the date that they apply on—something that is not currently possible. For adults receiving disability living allowance, we have developed a process to enable them to request an award of Scottish adult DLA, which, otherwise, is a closed benefit with no new applications possible. Crucially, the regulations provide for backdating of an award of Scottish benefits to the date on which the DWP award ends, as long as the client applies in the defined timeframe. We can also apply that backdating to any awards that were missed in the case transfer process or to awards made retrospectively. That design greatly reduces the possibility of gaps in entitlement and minimises the likelihood of individuals losing out on support that they are entitled to.

For carer support payment, the regulations also extend provision for temporary stop in entitlement where the payment has ended because the qualifying benefit of the person who is being cared for stopped as a result of that person moving to Scotland from the rest of the UK. That ensures that carer support payment can be reinstated more quickly and without the need for an application.

Alongside these regulations, we have designed processes to ensure that cross-border applications are identified quickly and can be prioritised. The regulations also include amendments to child disability payment, adult disability payment, pension age disability payment, Scottish adult DLA and Scottish child payment, to ensure that, when a person has continually disengaged with requests for information relating to an on-going award and is found to be no longer entitled to assistance following a period of suspension, the award can be ended from the date on which the award was suspended.

We have also taken this opportunity to make some minor, technical changes to residence and presence conditions, including for the best start grant and best start foods regulations; to update and add references to international agreements; and to remove now-redundant provisions relating to the initial period of applications for disability benefits within the regulations.

Subject to parliamentary approval, the changes will commence from 6 November 2025; for PADP and Scottish adult DLA, they will commence from 23 February 2026.

Elena Whitham (Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley) (SNP)

Good morning. In its reply to SCOSS, the Scottish Government said that it would prefer the DWP and Social Security Scotland to share data about clients moving between Scotland and the rest of the UK. Why has that not been possible and what will the impact of that be on disabled people and carers?

Shirley-Anne Somerville

This is a disappointing part of the regulations that I am presenting today. The priority for the Scottish Government was to make the journey for a client as smooth as possible. From our discussions with constituents, we all know that it is a complex system and that people might be unaware that, for example, they might have to move to a different benefit when they move from England to Scotland or vice versa. We had hoped to make the process easy for clients, as we did during case transfer. Unfortunately, the DWP has chosen not to take that route. If we cannot get the data from the DWP, we cannot have that kind of process. That is disappointing, because it makes the journey more difficult for the client. As I said in my opening remarks, we have endeavoured to put processes in place, which we would like to introduce if the regulations are passed, to support clients through the process as best we can and ensure that cases are prioritised within the agency. The situation is far from ideal, but, given that that is our starting point, we have done what we can to make the process smoother.

Will you continue to press for change in a continued quest for the data transfer to happen automatically, or will this be a fait accompli, if we approve the regulations?

Shirley-Anne Somerville

This is certainly the process that will be in place. With every benefit, we have a system of support to ensure that we analyse what happens in real time with real people as they go through the process, and that will be an important part of how we can evaluate how big any challenges for individuals are. If there is evidence of issues, we will not be talking theoretically but will be talking about the actual impact as people have gone through the process, so we would certainly go back to the DWP with that evidence, because this is not the position that I want to be in. However, at this point, the DWP’s position is the DWP’s position, so we have to get on with making the best that we can of the situation. I can reassure the committee that we have the process in place to see what is happening on the ground with clients as they go through the process.

David Torrance (Kirkcaldy) (SNP)

Good morning. You touched on this in your opening statement, cabinet secretary. Given that the DWP is not sharing data, what will adults who are in receipt of DLA who move to Scotland need to do to ensure that they get Scottish adult DLA?

Shirley-Anne Somerville

Again, this is a more complicated situation than we would have hoped for, but, nonetheless, it is about looking at how can we support people during that process. Although new applications are not available for Scottish adult DLA, it is important that there is an avenue for people in the rest of the UK, should they move up to Scotland. With regard to when we need further information, the Scottish adult DLA cross-border form has been developed. That will be available to people with an on-going DLA award who have moved to Scotland. In essence, that will be similar to the part 2 form that is used for other disability benefits, so that clients can provide the further information that is required about their conditions and how they affect them.

Under the arrangements, individuals who have moved to Scotland while receiving a DWP benefit will be signposted by the DWP to contact Social Security Scotland, and to ensure that people understand the process of accessing Scottish adult DLA, clear information will be provided through the usual channels. Again, the process is not ideal, but we have endeavoured to make it as simple as we can for the individuals concerned.

09:30  

Marie McNair (Clydebank and Milngavie) (SNP)

Good morning, cabinet secretary. Sticking with the data issue, I note that the SCOSS report referred to on-going efforts to agree data sharing with the DWP in cases of terminal illness. Can you update the committee on how those discussions are going?

Shirley-Anne Somerville

Despite best efforts, we have not been able to agree a cross-border process on terminal illness cases, which is, I think, particularly disappointing. We note that the commission welcomed the Scottish Government’s on-going attempts to agree a data-sharing option with the DWP for terminally ill clients. We would all hope that it is recognised that those clients are in some of the most vulnerable situations, and it would be far from ideal if we put an additional barrier, stress or process in place for those individuals and families. We will absolutely continue our efforts to reduce the burden that we are placing on those families wherever we possibly can.

The DWP has agreed to confirm with Social Security Scotland when a client is registered with it as eligible for special rules for terminal illness, and that will allow Social Security Scotland to confirm that status without needing to seek confirmation from the client. However, the process can be triggered only when a client applies for the special rules for terminal illness, and we have confirmed that it is a cross-border application.

Again, it is not an ideal position that we have been placed in, but we are continuing to work through the data-sharing options with the DWP, particularly for those vulnerable clients.

It is just very unfortunate for those people, given that time is not on their side.

The Deputy Convener

As there are no other questions, we move to item 5, which is formal consideration of motion S6M-18126, on approval of the regulations. I invite the cabinet secretary to speak to the motion, if she wishes, and to move it.

Motion moved,

That the Social Justice and Social Security Committee recommends that the Social Security (Cross-border Provision, Case Transfer and Miscellaneous Amendments) (Scotland) Regulations 2025 [draft] be approved.—[Shirley-Anne Somerville]

Motion agreed to.

The Deputy Convener

Thank you, cabinet secretary, and I hope that your autumn cold—[Interruption.] Oh right—thank you. The clerk has just told me that if I do not say this bitty, we cannot report on the instrument in the normal way. Are members content to delegate responsibility to me to publish a short factual report to the Parliament on the affirmative instrument?

Members indicated agreement.

The Deputy Convener

That being the case, I can now thank the cabinet secretary for battling through the evidence sessions, and I thank her officials in both sessions, too.

I suspend the meeting to allow for a change of witnesses as we move to item 6.

09:33 Meeting suspended.  

09:47 On resuming—