Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…
Chamber and committees

Communities Committee, 17 Mar 2004

Meeting date: Wednesday, March 17, 2004


Contents


Item in Private

The Convener (Johann Lamont):

Welcome to the Communities Committee. Agenda item 1 is to consider whether to take agenda item 4 in private. Agenda item 4 is to discuss how the committee might deal with discussion in the media of our stage 1 report on the Antisocial Behaviour etc (Scotland) Bill in advance of the report's publication. Do members agree that we should take that item in private?

Stewart Stevenson (Banff and Buchan) (SNP):

I am not certain that we should take item 4 in private, although I am persuadable. It would probably be of benefit to discuss the matter in public. I cannot think of anything that I expect to hear or say that could not be put in the Official Report, but I am interested in other views.

In principle, I am in favour of always discussing issues in public, if that is possible. Stewart Stevenson may be correct—it is not a third-world-war-starting issue.

The Convener:

We are working on it, though.

Discussion of the item in private might provide the opportunity for candour, which might allow us to advance the matter. I am more than comfortable about ensuring that the conclusion to our discussion is conducted in public at a later stage. I note that the similar problem that the Justice 2 Committee had has been resolved with a public apology. I am entirely relaxed about whether the initial discussion should be in public or private—I will say the same things in public or in private and I will be open with members.

I do not feel strongly about the issue, but Stewart Stevenson has a point. I am happy to go with the flow.

In that case, do members agree to take item 4 in public?

Members indicated agreement.