- Asked by: Claire Baker, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Siobhian Brown on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-32276 by Siobhian Brown on 19 December 2024, whether the Independent Working Group on Antisocial Behaviour reported to ministers "by the end of 2024", as set out in its answer, and by what date (a) the report and (b) its response to it will be published.
Answer
A pre-publication version of the report of the Independent Working Group on Antisocial Behaviour was submitted to myself, COSLA and Police Scotland just before Christmas. The report has since been finalised and was published on Tuesday 25th February 2025. It is available at Report of the Independent Working Group on Antisocial Behaviour. Along with our lead partners, COSLA and Police Scotland, we are considering the recommendations and support for local community safety and multi-agency prevention work. We plan to provide a comprehensive response in the Summer with a progress update by Easter. I am grateful to the Group for their work and to all who contributed.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many signs are located along the (a) A82, (b) A828, (c) A83, (d) A835, (e) A85, (f) A86, (g) A87, (h) A887, (i) A889, (j) A9, (k) A95, (l) A96 and (m) A99, and what proportion does not meet current standards for visibility and effectiveness, broken down by Category (i) 1 and (ii) 2 defects.
Answer
Category 1 defects are defined within the term maintenance contract as those that present, or could present, an immediate hazard to trunk road users. They are typically detected during the twice weekly driven safety related inspections. Category 2 defects are defined as those which do not present an immediate hazard to road users and are typically identified during walked annual inspections.
The following table contains the number of signs on the routes requested along with the number of signs with open defects of all types as at 12 February 2025.
| | Number of signs | Category 1 defects | Category 2 defects |
A82 | 5517 | 17 | 1600 |
A828 | 971 | 3 | 87 |
A83 | 2050 | 9 | 711 |
A835 | 1033 | 0 | 239 |
A85 | 3028 | 2 | 958 |
A86 | 1545 | 2 | 339 |
A87 | 2341 | 3 | 481 |
A887 | 188 | 0 | 67 |
A889 | 289 | 0 | 153 |
A9 | 6062 | 18 | 1374 |
A95 | 1157 | 0 | 84 |
A96 | 3064 | 18 | 274 |
A99 | 430 | 2 | 63 |
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many signs located along the (a) A82, (b) A828, (c) A83, (d) A835, (e) A85, (f) A86, (g) A87, (h) A887, (i) A889, (j) A9, (k) A95, (l) A96 and (m) A99 that were categorised as having a Category 1 defect did not receive a temporary or permanent repair by 6.00 am on the day following identification, in each year since 2021.
Answer
Transport Scotland’s Operating Companies are required to either repair or make safe Category 1 sign defects within 24 hours of detection. The following table provides the number of Category 1 sign related defects that were not recorded as either repaired or made safe within 24 hours.
| | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
A82 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
A828 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A83 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
A835 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A85 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A86 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
A87 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
A887 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A889 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A9 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
A95 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
A96 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
A99 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how the Freight Facilities Grant (FFG) contributes to its efforts to reduce road freight traffic, and what impact this has had on (a) road congestion and (b) air quality.
Answer
Since 1997, Freight Facilities Grants have removed over 50 million lorry miles from Scotland's roads. The exact impact on road congestion and air quality of each project cannot be confidently described due to the effect of other local influences on transport demand.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how it ensures that projects funded through the Freight Facilities Grant (FFG) align with its (a) economic, (b) environmental and (c) transport strategy.
Answer
Taking freight off congested roads and moving it by rail or water can ensure that freight is moved in an efficient, flexible and sustainable manner. Freight Facilities Grant (FFG) can act as an enabler for companies investing in facilities that without FFG, would not happen as they would not be commercially viable
Heavy goods vehicles are a major contributor to emissions within the Scottish economy. Emissions from rail are considerably lower. Scottish Government policy to encourage the shift of freight from road to rail and other, more sustainable forms of transport aligns with the priority to “take climate action” in the National Transport Strategy 2 and supports the legislative target for Scotland to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2045.
The Scottish Government has set regulatory targets for rail freight growth. The target for the period 2024 to 2029 is 8.7% and, if achieved, is forecast to result in an additional 2,200 annual trains by 2029.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what the process is for businesses to apply for the Freight Facilities Grant (FFG), and how long it typically takes for an application to be processed and assessed.
Answer
Any company which wants to move freight by rail or water rather than by road and which is proposing to invest in new freight handling facilities in Scotland or re-invest in existing facilities in Scotland may apply for FFG. Before making a formal application for FFG, a company is expected to approach Transport Scotland who will be able to give informal advice on whether, and to what extent, a freight facility may be eligible for FFG.
On receipt of the formal application, Transport Scotland may decide to seek independent engineering advice to examine the design and specification of the project. The costs of this will be borne by Transport Scotland. A visit to the site of the proposed facility, by Transport Scotland and by its appointed consultant, will be necessary.
Since the introduction of the scheme in 1997, applications have typically taken between 3-6 months to complete. However, it can take longer depending upon the complexity of the proposal and the time taken by the applicant to supply the information.
The application process for FFG is currently under review ahead of potential awards in financial year 2025-26.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what proportion of Freight Facilities Grant (FFG) funding has been allocated to projects that aim to improve rail freight infrastructure, and how this compares to funding for road and maritime projects.
Answer
A total of £70,443,984 has been allocated through the Freight Facilities Grant (FFG) since its introduction in 1997. Of this the spend on rail projects was £44,708,510, or 63% of the FFG budget. The spend on water projects was £25,735,474 which equates to 37% of the budget.
During the period 2022-23 to 2024-25, the Scottish Government invested over £2.8 billion on trunk road safety, adaptations, maintenance and improvement. The Scottish Parliament agreed in principle on 6 February 2025 to invest nearly £1.1 billion to ensure the trunk road network is well maintained and enhanced, and progress major road projects, including duelling the A9 and improving the A83.
Ports in Scotland are mostly independent statutory bodies – each governed by their own local legislation – and are deemed commercial entities. Therefore, the Scottish Government has no say in the day-to-day running of their business, nor can it dictate business decisions made by a company on how to best utilise its resources. This remains the responsibility of the port authority.
There are no Scottish Government funding options specifically for the commercial maritime sector. However, as commercial businesses, Scottish Enterprise can provide advice about what options could be available for private / public co-investment to develop port infrastructure. The Scottish Government and its agencies have supported a number of maritime proposals across Scotland, including large scale developments at Aberdeen and Stornoway, and through the Green Freeport initiatives at Inverness, Cromarty Firth and Forth Ports.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how it monitors the long-term efficacy of projects funded through the Freight Facilities Grant (FFG).
Answer
Traffic monitoring is undertaken after a facility funded under the grant scheme becomes operational.
Transport Scotland requires applicants to provide a return of traffic passing through the grant-aided facility. Transport Scotland will require verified tonnages reports from the applicant, in cases where the applicant is required to provide evidence to corroborate the traffic the documentation required will be agreed prior to the award of grant.
Monitoring will cover an agreed period of time to allow the required environmental benefits from the grant to be accrued by the applicant.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what steps it is taking to ensure that the Freight Facilities Grant (FFG) supports projects in both urban and rural areas equally.
Answer
Any company, in either a rural or urban area, which wants to move freight by rail or water rather than by road and which is proposing to invest in new freight handling facilities in Scotland or re-invest in existing facilities in Scotland may apply for Freight Facilities Grant. All applications are treated on their merits.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 27 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how much funding from the Freight Facilities Grant (FFG) has been directed to initiatives promoting the use of low-carbon or zero-emission freight transport solutions.
Answer
To date, no applications under Freight Facilities Grant have been received specifically promoting low carbon or zero emission solutions. However, the movement of freight by rail rather than road, especially over long distances, can result in lower emissions.