Chamber and committees

Where new energy developments come forward, applications are subject to site-specific assessments by the decision maker. Our Fourth National Planning Framework (NPF4) policy 11 (energy) requires that project design and mitigation demonstrate how impacts to communities, landscape, biodiversity and other receptors, including cumulative impacts, are addressed. It also encourages development to maximise net economic impact, including local and community socio-economic benefits. We have no current plans to introduce guidelines in addition to NPF4.

The Scottish Hospitals Inquiry was established in 2020, to investigate planning, design, construction and maintenance of both the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital/ Royal Hospital for Children (QEUH/RHC) and the Royal Hospital for Children and Young People/Department of Clinical Neurosciences (RHCYP/DCN). To that end, the Inquiry recently concluded 12 weeks of hearings into the QEUH/RHC’s built environment and the potential causal links to hospital acquired infections.

The evidence which was presented and heard at the recent hearing has been published by the Inquiry and is available on the Inquiry’s website (https://www.hospitalsinquiry.scot/).

In Counsel to the Inquiry’s closing statement, concerns were raised regarding the recommended guidelines for ventilation at the QEUH/RHC.

Lord Brodie has made it clear that the Scottish Hospitals Inquiry is on-going and therefore no conclusions should be taken from submissions to the Inquiry at this stage. Further oral hearings into the QEUH/RHC are scheduled for later this year.

Like all hospital sites, there is a comprehensive system of clinical oversight and patient safety monitoring at the QEUH/RHC. There has been no information reported through our robust governance arrangements which questions the safety of the hospital.

In addition, there have been no healthcare associated infection incidents reported to Scottish Government in the last 12 months relating to concerns on ventilation control.

To provide additional assurance, I have written to Healthcare Improvement Scotland (HIS) to undertake a formal review of the action plan arising from their Infection Prevention and Control inspection in 2022; to check the progress made against the recommendations and requirements.

The requested information is not held by the Scottish Government.

The adoption of the recommendations contained in the Independent External Review of Skye, Lochalsh and South West Ross Out Of Hours Services is the responsibility of NHS Highland. The recommendations were fully accepted by NHS Highland following the publication of the report in 2018.

The Scottish Government does not hold this information. Whether VAT applies to a visitor levy is a decision for the UK Government.

The Scottish Government is clear that any local authority thinking of introducing a Visitor Levy needs to consider the potential VAT implications that it would have for relevant businesses in their area.

The delivery of round-the-clock urgent care at Portree Hospital is the responsibility of NHS Highland. However, the Scottish Government is assured that 24/7 urgent care was restored at Portree Hospital on 16 August 2024.

The Scottish Government does not collect information on the age profile of scanning equipment held by NHS Boards. As holding bodies, NHS Boards are responsible for the management of their infrastructure assets and for identifying maintenance and replacement requirements.

The following table provides information on the number of patients under 18 years admitted to hospital where a diagnosis of tooth decay was recorded, from April 1999 to March 2024, in Scotland, by financial year.

Table 1: Number of patients under 18 years admitted to hospital where a diagnosis of tooth decay was recorded, from April 1999 to March 2024, in Scotland, by financial year.

The Scottish Government works closely with local authorities and partner organisations to embed the principles of The Promise in their policies and practices.

I regularly meet with Councillor Tony Buchanan, the COSLA Spokesperson for Children and Young People, to discuss progress and how we can work together to recognise and share good practice.

There is a large amount of positive work underway across Scotland through local authorities, partnerships and across the public and third sector. During my time in office I have had the honour to meet with children, young people, families and workforce across the country to see and hear of the impact of the projects and initiatives that are underway.

This includes work supported by our multi-year commitment to funding Children’s Services Planning Partnerships to transform family support in their local areas which was recently raised from £32 m to £38 m a year.

Children’s Services Planning Partnerships and local authority Promise teams capture local progress that they are undertaking and for example, I am aware that Renfrewshire recently published their Promise Report for 2025 which highlights all of the activity that they have undertaken over the past 5 years.

Understanding both good practice and the barriers and challenges to change is essential to support the next stages of national and local progress. While there is excellent work happening at local authority level, I am aware that there needs to be more consistency with progress across the country. I continue to encourage local authorities to share and learn from each other to make this happen.

I have asked The Promise Scotland to provide a picture of the activity underway in localities across Scotland to keep The Promise. This will draw on a range of sources as well as being informed by insights.

The Promise Progress Framework, which was published in December, will be instrumental in understanding how we are keeping The Promise and I welcome the recent recognition from the Promise Oversight Board of the important role that this will take.

The Framework has been developed by COSLA, The Scottish Government and The Promise Scotland, with input from key stakeholders including local authorities, Public Health Scotland, the Improvement Service, CELCIS, Who Cares? Scotland, the Care Inspectorate, Police Scotland and Scottish Fire and Rescue Service.

The Scottish Government’s Statutory Guidance on Corporate Parenting sets out how local authorities and public bodies consider their contribution towards providing safe, secure, stable and nurturing homes for young people leaving care. As corporate parents, all public bodies have a collective responsibility to help shape lives and provide opportunities for our children living in care and care leavers.

In January, the Scottish Government published the third statutory corporate parenting report which outlines the activity across Scotland by the Scottish Government and Executive Agencies, as well as other public bodies, to help uphold the rights and secure the wellbeing of children and young people in care and care leavers.

The Scottish Government provides Who Cares? Scotland with grant funding to deliver support and training to Corporate Parents.

Throughout our engagement with COSLA, Councils, and opposition parties ahead of the 2025-26 Scottish Budget, there was a clear consensus that Councils should have full flexibility for decisions on Council Tax rates. The Scottish Budget delivered that ask in full, as part of a record Local Government Settlement worth over £15 billion including real terms protection of General Revenue Grant, another key ask of COSLA and opposition parties.

Council Tax is a local tax, and decisions on rates are therefore a matter for local authorities to take in consultation with local communities.

The most financially vulnerable will continue to be protected through the Council Tax Reduction (CTR) scheme. The CTR scheme exists to ensure that nobody in Scotland should have to meet a council tax liability they cannot be expected to afford, and reduces a household’s liability based on an assessment of their income, capital, and other circumstances. Over 460,000 households receive some level of CTR, and on average recipients save over £850 a year.

Household water charges in Scotland are set by Scottish Water’s Board within the charge cap set for the regulatory period 2021-27, with approval from the independent economic regulator. Ministers do not have the powers to directly intervene in the process to set annual charges.

Charge increases in the first half of the regulatory period were significantly less than the charge cap, reflecting the financial impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic and cost of living crisis on households. The average bill for 2025-26 is expected to be £490 (£446 in 2024-25), which we expect to remain lower than the average in England and Wales (expected to be £603 as published by Discover Water).

Support for households with their water charges is linked to the exemptions, discounts and reductions they receive on their Council Tax. 52% of households receive some form of discount or reduction on their water charges, automatically applied by local authorities alongside reductions in council tax. One such scheme is the Water Charges Reduction Scheme (WCRS) which is available to customers in receipt of full Council Tax Reduction – we’ve already increased the maximum reduction from to 25% to 35% and the estimated value of the reduction provided is £74m in 2025-26. Consumer Scotland’s October 2024 report on affordability of water charges report shows that the number of households in water poverty has remained largely unchanged over the current regulatory period. We will be working with Consumer Scotland to look into affordability measures for the next regulatory period starting in 2027.