- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 01 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 13 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether any transgender prisoners with convictions for sex offences have been provided with gender-affirming items at public cost since 2021, and if so, how many.
Answer
I have asked Teresa Medhurst, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service (SPS), to respond. Her response is as follows:
The SPS seeks to be as open and transparent as possible, while also upholding our statutory obligation to protect the personal information of those in our care.
This information requested is not information held by the Scottish Prison Service.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 28 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 13 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a list of all leases that are currently held by the Scottish public sector, broken down by (a) cost and (b) department or agency.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not hold information on all public sector leases centrally. The following table shows all current Scottish Government leased properties and the cost of each lease.
Property | Total lease cost | Department |
10 Commerce Street (Fraserburgh Fishery Office) | £14,674.00 | Scottish Government |
28 Cunzie Street (Anstruther Fishery Office) | £12,223.00 | Scottish Government |
40 Hall Street (Campbeltown Fishery Office) | £8,839.00 | Scottish Government |
5 Atlantic Quay | £543,546.00 | Scottish Government |
7 Ferry Terminal Building (Kirkwall Fishery Office) | £2,500.00 | Scottish Government |
AB1 Building | £49,607.00 | Scottish Government |
Alexander Fleming House | £48,559.00 | Scottish Government |
Alexandra Buildings (Lerwick Fishery Office) | £26,392.00 | Scottish Government |
Bothwell House (Ground and First Floors) | £23,165.00 | Scottish Government |
Brooms Road - Dumfries | £259,827.00 | Scottish Government |
Bute House | £87,500.00 | Scottish Government |
Bute House Car Park | £8,250.00 | Scottish Government |
Caley Building (Peterhead Fishery Office) | £24,688.00 | Scottish Government |
Charlotte House | £83,645.00 | Scottish Government |
Compass House | £45,634.00 | Scottish Government |
Culag Pier (Lochinver Fishery Office) | £7,502.00 | Scottish Government |
Custom House (Stornoway Fishery Office) | £18,817.00 | Scottish Government |
Denholm House | £107,818.00 | Scottish Government |
Fishmarket Building (Eyemouth Fishery Office) | £10,688.00 | Scottish Government |
Garage No.2 Lockup, North St, Fraserburgh | £15,260.00 | Scottish Government |
Hadrian House | £96,061.00 | Scottish Government |
Harbour Buildings (Mallaig Fishery Office) | £4,037.00 | Scottish Government |
Inchbraoch House | £5,983.00 | Scottish Government |
James Street | £503.00 | Scottish Government |
Kinlochbervie Fishery Office - Number 7 | £2,609.00 | Scottish Government |
Ocean Trade Centre | £141,572.00 | Scottish Government |
Office at Tarbert Fish Market | £788.00 | Scottish Government |
Russell House | £285,238.00 | Scottish Government |
Kinlochbervie Fishery Office - Number 5 | £1,400.00 | Scottish Government |
Saughton House - land | £160,000.00 | Scottish Government |
Scotland House - Brussels | £373,930.00 | Scottish Government |
Scotland House - London | £439,230.00 | Scottish Government |
St Ola House (Scrabster Fishery Office) | £20,000.00 | Scottish Government |
Strathearn House | £393,722.00 | Scottish Government |
The Douglas Centre (Buckie Fishery Office) | £5,767.00 | Scottish Government |
The Island Centre, Crossapol | £6,300.00 | Scottish Government |
The Links, Golspie | £16,845.00 | Scottish Government |
The Zoology Building | £162,441.00 | Scottish Government |
Unit 4, Seagate, Peterhead | £5,946.00 | Scottish Government |
Unit 4B Kinlochleven Business Park | £5,416.00 | Scottish Government |
Unit 5, Old Quay - Campbeltown | £1,000.00 | Scottish Government |
West Shore Street (Ullapool Fishery Office) | £6,750.00 | Scottish Government |
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 17 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 13 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has engaged with the UK Government to explore joint ownership of Grangemouth refinery, and whether it has received any indication of support for such a proposal.
Answer
Scottish Ministers, including the First Minister, have urged UK Ministers on numerous occasions to take tangible and decisive action to secure the site’s long term and sustainable future. We have continued to assert that the Scottish Government stands ready to play its part but that we require the weight of the UK Government’s vast resources to be deployed.
The UK Government’s commitment of £200 million from the National Wealth Fund to support Grangemouth’s transition is welcome but it must be available now. I hope the member will join me in calling on UK Ministers to provide clarity as to how businesses at Grangemouth can access this money to ensure new employment opportunities are made available in the near future and not much further down the line.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 17 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 13 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has held any discussions with Petroineos regarding public ownership of Grangemouth refinery, and if so, whether it will publish the minutes of those discussions.
Answer
To date, we have never received a request from the business for such an intervention therefore no discussions have taken place.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 06 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus Robertson on 13 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what the reasons are for its reported position that an independent Scotland would be better able to mitigate the impact on Scotland of economic and financial uncertainty, and what evidence informed its position on the matter.
Answer
I refer the member to the publication, A stronger economy with independence, which sets out detailed proposals on how the Scottish Government would use the full powers of independence to build an inclusive, fair, wellbeing economy that works for everyone in Scotland, and will allow us to replicate the success of many neighbouring countries which are more prosperous, productive and fairer than the UK.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 13 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the greenhouse gas emissions attributable to transporting liquefied natural gas (LNG) by road to the bunkering point for the MV Glen Sannox, including (a) the total CO2-equivalent emissions per tonne of LNG transported and (b) a comparison with the emissions profile of delivering an equivalent energy quantity of marine diesel.
Answer
In 2014, Transport Scotland, supported by Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd and CalMac Ferries Ltd (CFL), set out the case to procure two new dual-fuel vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides ferry network which included analysis of fuel emissions and estimated operating costs. In November 2023, Transport Scotland requested a report from CFL on expected carbon emissions relating to Liquified Natural Gas, including end-to-end transportation. CFL completed a detailed assessment and provided their findings to Transport Scotland in a report in January 2024. This report has been released and is available on the Scottish Government website via the following link:
https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/foi-eir-release/2024/06/foi-202400412376/documents/eir-202400412376---information-released---annex-a---c/eir-202400412376---information-released---annex-a---c/govscot%3Adocument/EIR%2B202400412376%2B-%2BInformation%2Breleased%2B-%2BAnnex%2BA%2B-%2BC.pdf
CFL have set out a range of activities and actions around fuel use and emissions monitoring in their 2024 – 2027 Environmental Plan and we will continue to work with them to reduce carbon emissions and improve environmental sustainability of ferry operations in the coming years.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 13 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what modelling it has undertaken of the whole-life greenhouse gas emissions arising from the combined use of marine diesel and liquefied natural gas by the MV Glen Sannox, and how these projections compare with the emissions profile of a comparable conventional diesel-only ferry operating on the same route.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to the question S6W-37241 on 13 May 2025. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers
- Asked by: Jamie Greene, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 13 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government when a review of the emergency department opt-out blood borne virus testing pilot will be complete, and whether there are any initial findings to report.
Answer
The Scottish Government’s recently published Programme for Government includes a commitment to begin roll out of Emergency Department opt-out testing for blood borne viruses in NHS Lothian and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, with further expansion considered if emerging evidence supports this. Work is ongoing to evaluate and collate the findings from the pilots in Scotland with the currently available evidence supporting roll-out in areas of higher diagnosed prevalence.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 13 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether it is appropriate for Scottish universities to pursue joint research ventures with Chinese state-owned companies or universities that have been sanctioned or identified as high risk by the UK or allied governments.
Answer
The Scottish Government expects Scottish universities, as autonomous bodies, to carefully consider and manage the reputational, ethical and security risks associated with pursuing joint research ventures within global academic networks. Alliances that universities form within these networks are a matter for them and their governing bodies, as long as they are within the law.
As part of this, we expect universities to carefully consider advice and existing guidance on international partnership risk management from bodies like Universities UK and the UK Government’s Research Collaboration Advice Team.
Additionally, the Universities should conduct due diligence in relation to national security, which is a matter reserved to the UK Government, and compliance comply with relevant legal requirements, such as the National Security Act 2023 and National Security and Investment Act 2021.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kaukab Stewart on 13 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to apologise to any women’s rights campaigners who may have been mischaracterised or dismissed as a result of expressing views that the term “woman” refers to biological sex, in light of the Supreme Court ruling regarding For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers.
Answer
The Scottish Government accepts the Supreme Court judgment.
The Supreme Court counselled against reading this judgment as a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another. It is not. The ruling gives clarity on the interpretation of two pieces of relevant legislation passed at Westminster. We will now engage on the implications of the ruling. Protecting the rights of all will underpin our actions. The Scottish Government acted in good faith in our interpretation of both the Gender Recognition Act 2004 and the Equality Act 2010; and as the Supreme Court recognised, our approach was consistent with advice then given by the EHRC.