- Asked by: Oliver Mundell, MSP for Dumfriesshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 18 May 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 7 June 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what the average reading age of a young person leaving school in Scotland has been in each of the last five years.
Answer
The Achievement of Curriculum for Excellence Levels publication provides information on the number of publicly funded school children in Primary 1, Primary 4, Primary 7 and Secondary 3 who have achieved the expected Curriculum for Excellence level in the literacy organisers (reading, writing and listening and talking) and numeracy.
Schools were closed in Scotland between March 2020 and the end of the academic year as a result of the pandemic meaning that they were closed on the date of 8 June 2020. It was concluded that it would not be possible to collect consistent data that was fit for purpose and that any attempt to do so would add considerably to other pressures on school and education authority staff. The decision was therefore taken to suspend the data collection in 2019-20.
The latest publication collected data for 2020-21 for Primary school (P1, P4 and P7) pupils only. Secondary school and special school data was not collected due to other pressures on these schools including implementation of the SQA National Qualifications Alternative Certification Model which was used to award National 5s, Highers and Advanced Highers in 2021.
The current intention is to collect all data– for Primary, Secondary and Special school pupils – in 2021-22, although this will be kept under review.
The latest information on Reading can be found at the following table and the link provided:
Achievement of Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) Levels 2020-21 - gov.scot (www.gov.scot)
Table 1: Percentage of pupils achieving expected CfE Levels, 2016-17 to 2020-21 |
Year | Stage-Level | Reading | Writing | Listening & Talking | Literacy | Numeracy |
2020-21 | P1 - Early Level | 77 | 74 | 84 | 71 | 81 |
P4 - First Level | 73 | 67 | 82 | 64 | 72 |
P7 - Second Level | 76 | 69 | 82 | 66 | 72 |
P1, P4 and P7 combined | 75 | 70 | 83 | 67 | 75 |
S3 - Third Level or better | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] |
S3 - Fourth Level | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] |
2019-20 | P1 - Early Level | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] |
P4 - First Level | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] |
P7 - Second Level | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] |
P1, P4 and P7 combined | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] |
S3 - Third Level or better | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] |
S3 - Fourth Level | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] | [no data] |
2018-19 | P1 - Early Level | 82 | 79 | 87 | 76 | 85 |
P4 - First Level | 78 | 73 | 85 | 70 | 77 |
P7 - Second Level | 80 | 74 | 86 | 71 | 76 |
P1, P4 and P7 combined | 80 | 75 | 86 | 72 | 79 |
S3 - Third Level or better | 91 | 90 | 91 | 88 | 90 |
S3 - Fourth Level | 55 | 52 | 57 | 48 | 59 |
2017-18 | P1 - Early Level | 81 | 78 | 87 | 75 | 85 |
P4 - First Level | 77 | 72 | 85 | 69 | 76 |
P7 - Second Level | 79 | 73 | 84 | 70 | 75 |
P1, P4 and P7 combined | 79 | 74 | 85 | 71 | 78 |
S3 - Third Level or better | 90 | 89 | 91 | 87 | 89 |
S3 - Fourth Level | 53 | 51 | 55 | 46 | 56 |
2016-17 | P1 - Early Level | 80 | 77 | 85 | 74 | 83 |
P4 - First Level | 77 | 71 | 83 | 68 | 75 |
P7 - Second Level | 76 | 69 | 81 | 66 | 70 |
P1, P4 and P7 combined | 78 | 72 | 83 | 69 | 76 |
S3 - Third Level or better | 90 | 89 | 91 | 87 | 88 |
S3 - Fourth Level | 51 | 48 | 51 | 44 | 56 |
In addition, the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2018 results show that Scotland's score for reading had increased between 2015 and 2018, with a statistically significant improvement. This demonstrates that we are on the right track, making progress where it counts - in the classroom.
- Asked by: Sharon Dowey, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 May 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 7 June 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what procedures are in place to determine where people arriving in Scotland from Ukraine, under its Super Sponsor scheme, are located.
Answer
The Super Sponsor scheme is designed to provide a quick and safe route for displaced people from Ukraine to come to a place of sanctuary by removing the need for applicants to be matched to an individual sponsor prior to being given permission to travel to the UK.
Once people have arrived, a national matching service, delivered by COSLA, will match those settling here with longer-term accommodation across Scotland.
Displaced people from Ukraine are asked to complete a short questionnaire that captures key information and preferences. This information is then used to find suitable longer-term accommodation, which will be offered as a choice.
All 32 of our local authorities are taking part in this programme, and hosts have offered up their homes right across the country. The national matching service will ensure that people are offered settlement opportunities across Scotland, recognising that people will have different preferences and available housing is limited in some local authorities.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 May 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 7 June 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will publish all the information that it
holds on the market value testing of Crown Estate Scotland’s ScotWind sales
process, which launched in June 2020 with the pre-defined option fee levels of
£2,000/km2, £6,000/km2 or £10,000km2.
Answer
Crown Estate Scotland have not sold seabed through the ScotWind leasing process. Option Agreements and ultimately leases to use areas of the seabed for offshore wind energy generation have been provided, raising around £700 million in initial fees and potentially many millions more in rent, once these projects are operational. If projects do not proceed to full lease, the option agreements expire. Furthermore, through the Supply Chain Development Statements, ScotWind developers will invest an average of £1.5 billion in Scotland for each project – across the 17 different sites, that could lead to more than £25 billion of investment.
As per S6W-08314 on 7 June 2022, Crown Estate Scotland conducted market testing and evidence gathering to inform option fee levels and this is not information held by Scottish Government. Following the announcement of The Crown Estate’s Round 4 results and a very clear change in the market, Crown Estate Scotland paused and reviewed the ScotWind option fee levels accordingly.
All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers
- Asked by: Sharon Dowey, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 May 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 7 June 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether people arriving from Ukraine under its Super Sponsor scheme, who have expressed a preference for a particular area of Scotland, are being actively matched with households in that area who have offered to host.
Answer
The Super Sponsor scheme is designed to provide a quick and safe route for displaced people from Ukraine to come to a place of sanctuary by removing the need for applicants to be matched to an individual sponsor prior to being given permission to travel to the UK.
Once people have arrived, a national matching service, delivered by COSLA, will match those settling here with longer-term accommodation across Scotland.
Displaced people from Ukraine are asked to complete a short questionnaire that captures key information and preferences. This information is then used to find suitable longer-term accommodation, which will be offered as a choice.
All 32 of our local authorities are taking part in this programme, and hosts have offered up their homes right across the country. The national matching service will ensure that people are offered settlement opportunities across Scotland, recognising that people will have different preferences and available housing is limited in some local authorities.
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 May 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 7 June 2022
To ask the Scottish Government how many of the recommendations in the report of Independent Review of the Role of Incineration in the Waste Hierarchy in Scotland it has already adopted, and how many it is planning to adopt.
Answer
We are carefully considering the recommendations of the Independent Review of the Role of Incineration in Scotland’s Waste Hierarchy. We will set out our initial response to the recommendations in June 2022.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 May 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 7 June 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what information it holds on the reasons for Crown Estate Scotland’s position, as stated in the ScotWind Pre-Launch Summary, published in July 2019, that it was “currently minded” that applicants should not pay more than £10,000 per km2 of seabed.
Answer
Crown Estate Scotland is responsible for the ScotWind seabed leasing process, including setting Option Agreement fees and rent prices. Crown Estate Scotland informed Scottish Government of its pricing structure based on its own evidence gathering and information available at the time. Once projects are under seabed leases and wind farms are generating energy, rental payments are annual – these are separate from the Option Agreement payments.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 May 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 7 June 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether it proposed that ScotWind’s option fee model should include annual fees, and, if so, whether it did so (a) prior to or (b) following the announcement of the results, in February 2021, of the Offshore Wind Leasing Round 4 auction by the Crown Estate.
Answer
Crown Estate Scotland (CES) is responsible for the ScotWind seabed leasing process and undertook the review following the Round 4 announcements. The Scottish Government was informed of options under consideration by CES and of the review’s conclusions, which it supports. Annual fees were considered by CES but ultimately not selected as a preferred option, before or after review.
Furthermore, once projects have secured seabed leases and wind farms are generating energy annual rental payments will be made.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 May 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 7 June 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will consider taking steps to incentivise opt-out testing for hepatitis C in drugs services by (a) including opt-out testing requirements in service contracts and (b) another incentivisation method.
Answer
The Scottish Government is open to considering all interventions that can be demonstrated to improve access to and engagement with hepatitis C testing and treatment.
People who are at risk as a result of their drug use often experience a range of health and social issues. That’s why eliminating Hepatitis C from Scotland requires a person-centred approach. NHS Tayside became the first region in the world to achieve elimination by using a person centred approach, leading to better engagement and more successful treatment.
A range of work is under way in partnership with the Scottish Health Protection Network Hepatitis C group to embed this learning more widely; In the meantime, we have funded pilots, such as the Cocoon Project, which is specifically focused on those who inject drugs. The pilot will be evaluated in due course and any learning will be shared to enable a system-wide improvement across Scotland.
- Asked by: Paul O'Kane, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 May 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Christina McKelvie on 7 June 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on the timescale for the implementation of the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021.
Answer
The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021 must be implemented effectively so that, once in force, it offers robust protections to victims. The Scottish Government is working closely with justice partners to agree a suitable commencement date for the Act.
To complement the implementation of the Act, we are developing a new hate crime strategy for publication later this year, which will help to guide how we successfully tackle hatred and prejudice in Scotland.
To support this, I chaired the inaugural meeting of the Hate Crime Strategic Partnership Group on 28 April. This group will provide a collaborative, multi-agency approach to the Strategy’s development.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 May 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 7 June 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the ScotWind Offshore Wind Leasing: Advisory Note, produced for it by the University of Strathclyde Centre for Energy Policy, in April 2020, other than the three pre-defined option fee levels, what, if any, other levels of option fees were considered at that time, and whether it will provide a copy of any information that it (a) holds and (b) published at that time in relation to the recommendation in the Advisory Note “that all levels be fully justified and explained, with consideration and clarity given on why there are no higher increments”.
Answer
The Scottish Government did not set the ScotWind seabed lease Option Agreement fees. The advisory note prepared for the Scottish Government recommends that any new, higher, levels be appropriately justified. Crown Estate Scotland (“CES”) proceeded to satisfy those requirements through, in this case, appropriate consideration of externally procured advice. CES explained to SG the rationale for the pricing structure adopted. No further information is held relating to that recommendation.