- Asked by: Oliver Mundell, MSP for Dumfriesshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 November 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 22 November 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what support is available to any individual households who are experiencing difficulties with connectivity, in light of reported delays to the R100 programme.
Answer
The R100 programme comprises of three R100 contracts with BT plc, the R100 Scottish Broadband Voucher Scheme and commercial coverage. For those within future R100 contract build plans, there are a number of satellite and mobile service providers who can deliver a commercial service in the meantime. Ofcom’s broadband and mobile service checker, which can be found at https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-telecoms-and-internet/advice-for-consumers/advice/ofcom-checker , can provide more information on what is available in their area.
Our R100 Scottish Broadband Voucher Scheme remains available for those whose properties are not expected to benefit from either R100 contract build or commercial coverage.
- Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 11 November 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 22 November 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to reintroduce a passenger ferry service to Europe, and when it expects any such service to be operational.
Answer
The Scottish Government is very supportive of the reintroduction of a passenger ferry service from Scotland to Europe. My officials in Transport Scotland have engaged with a number of interested parties proposing such services and we will continue to engage with potential operators and Scotland’s main ports to provide information and advice on what the Scottish Government can offer in support of a viable commercial ferry proposition.
The commerciality and viability of any new service are key considerations for both the Scottish Government and potential operators. Subsidy Control rules limit the support which can be provided by the Scottish Government and the support which we are able to bring to bear is designed to support the initial start-up of a new service and dependent on a realistic prospect of that service reaching commercial viability and without the need for ongoing support from public funds.
Ministers and officials have chaired regular stakeholder engagement sessions with key port stakeholder as well as freight forwarders and logistics companies. The aim is to explore how goods currently get to market, and why hauliers choose these routes, and understand the opportunities for Scottish ports and their degree of attractiveness to freight forwarders responsible for shipping Scottish goods. Any viable passenger ferry service would require regular freight traffic to be sustainable.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 11 November 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 22 November 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the impact of the Emergency Budget Review on tackling alcohol harms, in light of it reportedly stating that budget savings will mean that the work that can be taken forward to develop alcohol treatment targets and reviewing how alcohol brief interventions are delivered across Scotland will be delivered at a slower pace.
Answer
The Emergency Budget Review is about supporting those who need most help, whilst also managing the nation’s budget. This has meant making hard choices to further prioritise spending and find savings.
The Scottish Government, in collaboration with Public Health Scotland (PHS) is undertaking a review of alcohol brief interventions (ABIs). Initial recommendations are expected in Spring 2023, which will determine subsequent work and funding required to further develop ABIs in Scotland.
Work is underway on the development of alcohol treatment targets. An expert working group will provide recommendations to Ministers in 2023, which will determine subsequent next steps.
- Asked by: Daniel Johnson, MSP for Edinburgh Southern, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 November 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 22 November 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what advice it received from the Mobility and Access Committee for Scotland in relation to proposed regulations about pavement parking exemptions.
Answer
The Mobility and Access Committee for Scotland (MACS) wrote to Transport Scotland in March 2022 expressing their desire that no Ministerial Directions be given on which type of pavement can be considered by local authorities for an Exemption Order. We sought to allay their concerns during a meeting between MACS and the Minister for Transport on 15 June 2022 and a further meeting with the policy lead of MACS and Transport Scotland.
During these meetings we confirmed that exemptions had already been the subject of Parliamentary debate during the passage of the Transport (Scotland) Act 2019. We also confirmed that Ministerial Directions will not allow for blanket exemptions of streets from the National pavement parking prohibitions and will set out scenarios where local authorities may be able to consider an exemption. Exemptions will only be considered in exceptional circumstances and will not be the norm. Any such exemptions will require to be clearly marked by signs and lines on the ground so that a driver can be in no doubt where pavement parking is permitted.
Additionally, we are currently finalising the wording of the Ministerial Directions to take account of any issues raised in the public consultation.
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 November 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 22 November 2022
To ask the Scottish Government when it originally planned to begin fully dualling the A96, and what impact its consultation has had on that start date.
Answer
As with all trunk road improvement projects, delivery of any section of the A96 Programme can only commence if approved under the relevant statutory procedures and thereafter a timetable for progress can be set in line with available budgets. The statutory right for individuals to have their say on our proposals cannot be set aside and it is essential that vital feedback is taken into account as we develop our plans.
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 November 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 22 November 2022
To ask the Scottish Government when it will publish the results of its consultation on dualling the A96.
Answer
As advised at the recent Scottish Parliament debate on Essential Road Improvements held on 02 November 2022, the first part of the review, a report on the Public Consultation and the Initial Appraisal: The Case for Change will be published by the end of the year.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 November 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 22 November 2022
To ask the Scottish Government who is responsible for taking the lead on invasive species control in river catchments.
Answer
NatureScot is the lead organisation for non-native species on land including wetlands and riparian zones. They lead on riverbank vegetation and all land animals (vertebrates and invertebrates). Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) take the lead in the freshwater environment (still and flowing). Scottish Forestry and Forestry and Land Scotland take the lead on woodland and other habitats on the national forest estate. In many cases, fisheries trusts have taken the lead on co-ordinated action on riverine INNS such as giant hogweed.
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 November 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 22 November 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the publication of the consultation on the A96, who will have responsibility for making the final decision on whether to proceed with the dualling.
Answer
As with all devolved matters, the Scottish Ministers make the final decision on investment in the transport network.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 November 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 22 November 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-05102 by Graeme Dey on 5 January 2022, how much Highlands and Islands Airports Limited's (HIAL) Air Traffic Management System project has cost to date.
Answer
The cost of the Air Traffic Management 2030 Strategy project was £9,963,937.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 November 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 22 November 2022
To ask the Scottish Government how much has been paid in subsidies to (a) Barra, (b) Benbecula, (c) Campbeltown, (d) Dundee, (e) Inverness, (f) Islay, (g) Kirkwall, (h) Sumburgh, (i) Stornoway, (j) Tiree and (k) Wick John O'Groats Airport in each year since 2017-18, broken down by capital and revenue allocations.
Answer
The following table provides the information requested in relation to capital allocations. For completeness, HIAL Head Office figures are also included. Figures include both grant and loan funding.
Airport | 2017-18 (£) | 2018-19 (£) | 2019-20 (£) | 2020-21 (£) | 2021-22 (£) |
Barra | 183,481.08 | 108,483.61 | 457,063.78 | 353,902.34 | 867,883.49 |
Benbecula | 779,393.75 | 627,447.75 | 135,974.70 | 600,168.73 | 1,690,104.96 |
Campbeltown | 193,284.51 | 131,895.32 | 615,854.76 | 286,619.78 | 4,776,933.08 |
Dundee | 207,058.60 | 367,727.00 | 184,316.62 | 1,394,046.70 | 965,679.77 |
Inverness | 3,082,271.52 | 2,759,966.51 | 4,726,100.48 | 9,406,498.54 | 11,645,971.05 |
Islay | 100,276.74 | 125,036.04 | 170,835.64 | 470,970.26 | 735,028.98 |
Kirkwall | 620,656.50 | 1,654,164.92 | 354,782.05 | 1,556,529.87 | 4,673,773.88 |
Stornoway | 2,802,889.70 | 433,188.33 | 291,442.76 | 2,187,427.27 | 4,028,778.43 |
Sumburgh | 1,069,276.36 | 1,018,554.48 | 2,787,491.56 | 3,404,861.35 | 1,912,617.76 |
Tiree | 170,282.71 | 667,049.27 | 269,461.82 | 582,983.03 | 630,003.17 |
Wick John O’Groats | 341,024.96 | 269,639.44 | 400,068.75 | 315,326.56 | 530,130.34 |
Head Office | 339,733.76 | 224,446.02 | 3,690,673.05 | 3,241,700.54 | 4,445,809.64 |
The Scottish Government does not provide HIAL with revenue allocations on an airport by airport basis. Revenue funding is provided to HIAL as a Group with HIAL then allocating funding across the company, including on Head Office functions, on an as needed basis in order to achieve a breakeven position in any given period. The following table shows the revenue funding provided to HIAL in each year since 2017-18.
Year | Revenue Allocation (£) |
2017-18 | 20,431,303.22 |
2018-19 | 21,617,923.68 |
2019-20 | 24,304,094.00 |
2020-21 | 38,009,537.28 |
2021-22 | 38,086,473.99 |