- Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 8 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how much funding it has directed towards research into postural tachycardia syndrome in each year since 2007.
Answer
The Scottish Government’s Chief Scientist Office has not funded any research that is directly related to postural tachycardia from the years 2007 to today.
The Scottish Government’s Chief Scientist Office operates open competitive funding schemes for applied health research projects and fellowships across the wide range of NHS and health challenges in Scotland. These schemes are open to consideration of applications addressing research directed into postural tachycardia syndrome. Applications to these schemes are assessed through independent expert peer-review with funding recommendations made by independent expert committees.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 8 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the announcement by the UK Government on 20 January 2023 that its Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) will not include glass, and the reported concerns of SMEs regarding the inclusion of glass in Scotland’s DRS, whether it will review its plans to include glass as part of the DRS.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-14934 on 8 March 2023. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at: https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/questions-and-answers .
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 8 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the announcement by the UK Government on 20 January 2023 that its Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) will not include glass, whether it will reappraise the financial assumptions for its DRS regarding any additional costs relating to compliance with two different regimes operating in the UK for (a) producers, including (i) labelling, (ii) production and (iii) distribution costs and (b) wholesalers, including the storage of goods in different stock keeping units, and, following of any such reappraisal, whether it will publish a supplementary Financial Memorandum setting out its analysis of any additional costs.
Answer
The financial assumptions contained with the Final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment (BRIA) published in December 2021 show the projected cost to businesses in terms of compliance with the Scottish Deposit Return Scheme (DRS). The UK Government is responsible for providing details to industry regarding the potential financial impact of its DRS. We will continue to work closely with the UK and devolved governments to maximise interoperability of the schemes when they go live.
- Asked by: Rachael Hamilton, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 8 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how much venison has been sold from estates managed by Forestry and Land Scotland to wholesalers, in each year since 2016.
Answer
Forestry and Land Scotland sells the venison (deer carcasses in skin) produced on Scotland’s national forests and land to Approved Game Meat Handling Establishments (AGHE), not a ‘wholesaler’.
The volume sold to AGHEs broken down by financial year as follows:
Financial Year | Volume of Venison Sold (kg) |
2016-17 | 720.1k |
2017-18 | 837.6k |
2018-19 | 786.1k |
2019-20 | 791.9k |
2020-21 | 714.6k |
2021-22 | 884.8k |
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 8 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-08012 by Lorna Slater on 12 May 2022, and in light of the announcement by the UK Government on 20 January 2023 that its Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) will not include glass, whether it will provide an answer to the question that was asked.
Answer
The UK government announcement related to the proposed scheme in England. Wales has also confirmed their scheme will include glass.
The Scottish Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) business case suggests that including glass will save over 1.2 megatonnes CO2 equivalent over 25 years, and will significantly increase the quantity and quality of glass recyclate. We will continue to work closely with the UK and devolved governments to maximise interoperability of the schemes when they go live, and hope that the UK government will, over time, follow the other UK nations and reconsider its decision to exclude glass.
- Asked by: Rachael Hamilton, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 8 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has assessed the potential impact that Forestry and Land Scotland’s contract with venison dealers in Scotland has had on the ability of land managers to sell venison on to wholesalers.
Answer
The Forestry and Land Scotland contract for the sale of venison from Scotland’s national forests and land was awarded by a competitive tender following substantial stakeholder engagement / market research.
The stakeholder engagement / market research considered all aspects of the venison market both in Scotland and the UK and involved the following (amongst others):
- Association of Deer Management Groups (ADMG)
- Lowland Deer Network
- Scottish Quality Wild Venison
- Scottish Venison Association
- Approved Game Meat Handling Establishments (AGHE) processing venison
- Ardgay Game
- Highland Game
- Simpson Game
- Lincolnshire Game
- Hubertus Game
- Ben Rigby
Following the stakeholder engagement / market research a tender strategy was developed, which detailed how the contract would be structured to maximise the benefits in line with the Scottish Venison Strategy.
- Asked by: Jeremy Balfour, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Clare Haughey on 8 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what progress has been made, since the Children (Scotland) Bill became an Act in October 2020, regarding its commitment to introduce guidance on children in care maintaining a connection with former foster carers, which was made during the amending stages of the Bill, and, if it is the case that the guidance has not progressed, what it is doing to fulfil its commitment to ensure that children in care do not face any detrimental impact due to such broken relationships.
Answer
The Scottish Government values the commitment that foster carers make to providing safe and loving homes for children and young people who are not able to stay with their own families. As part of Keeping The Promise, we are taking action to support children and young people to maintain the connections and friendships that are most important to them.
Whilst the Scottish Government has not published specific guidance on maintaining contact with former foster carers, the principle of helping children and young people maintain positive relationships is at the heart of the Staying Together and Connected guidance published in July 2021. This guidance has been supported by a National Implementation Group whose work is due to conclude in Spring. Part of the Group’s work has been to consider what more we can do to better understand, map and support the key relationships that are important to children and young people.
The Why Not? Trust has developed a Directory called Why Not? Reconnect which provides adults, who experienced foster care in their childhood, the opportunity to reconnect with those foster families who cared for them. The Directory is funded through the Promise Partnership Fund, a Scottish Government Fund aimed at delivering work to Keep The Promise.
- Asked by: Jamie Greene, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 8 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether it remains committed to restoring 20,000 hectares of Scottish peatland annually, as set out in its Programme for Government 2020-21, and for what reason it reportedly fell 14,630 hectares short of this target in 2021-22.
Answer
We remain committed to significantly increasing the rate of restoration as one of the transformative changes needed to meet the targets set out in the Climate Change Plan. In 2020 we set out ambitious plans to invest more than £250 million over ten years to restore at least 250,000 hectares of degraded peatlands by 2030.
Against this target, we have delivered around 64,000 hectares to date at an annual rate of around 6,000 hectares in recent years. This falls short of our annual target of 20,000 hectares. There are a number of reasons for this, including the fact that peatland restoration is a sector in its infancy and has not yet developed significant supply capacity. Contractor capacity is limited, as is the field of technical advisers and agents to support land owners and managers through restoration projects.
Our Peatland Programme is working to address the many barriers to transforming restoration rates in order to meet both current and future targets. We are taking actions to boost supply and demand, to create new levers and incentives through agriculture and land reform, and to increase private investment.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 24 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 8 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government when it first learned of reports that avian flu could be transferred to seals, and whether any monitoring of seals has since taken place.
Answer
In December 2021 the Animal Disease Policy Group (ADPG), which includes a range of avian influenza experts and representatives from UK administrations, agreed to collect and store samples from non-avian wildlife through the existing Diseases of Wildlife Surveillance (DoWS) scheme for retrospective testing. This would allow a better understanding of the epidemiological situation regarding influenza viruses in non-avian wildlife species while limiting the pressure on veterinary resource or the National Reference Laboratory (NRL) Weybridge allowing the prioritisation of testing of wild birds and poultry. ADPG took the decision in July 2022 to commence the retrospective testing of stored samples of mammal carcasses at the NRL. The samples had been collected as part of routine wildlife surveillance in 2021 and 2022. In February 2023 it was reported to Scottish Government that four seals from Scotland have returned positive findings of HPAI H5N1 from this retrospective testing programme.
Despite these findings, the risk of the H5N1 strain to non-avian species, including humans, remains low. The positive identification of HPAI in mammals remains an unusual event and available genomic surveillance data, reported by APHA in the UK, indicates that there is no widespread mammalian adaption of the virus.
Scottish Government continues to monitor the UK and international situation regarding HPAI in avian and non-avian wildlife. Since the beginning of 2023, APHA have moved to a system of real-time testing through the GB wildlife surveillance scheme of mammalian samples collected including seals.
- Asked by: Paul O'Kane, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 03 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kevin Stewart on 8 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on when it will fulfil its commitment to abolish non-residential social care charges.
Answer
The Scottish Government remains committed to the removal of non-residential social care support charges within the lifetime of the current Parliament, so that services are based on a person’s need and not their ability to pay.