- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-11897 by Mairi Gougeon on 17 November 2022, (a) how much and (b) what percentage of its overall allocation to the Community Led Local Development Fund has been allocated by Local Action Groups to staffing and resourcing, and (i) how much and (ii) what percentage was allocated to staffing and resourcing by each group.
Answer
For staffing and resourcing, the Scottish Government set a maximum staffing support rate of 15% of their total allocation or £57,143 for individual Local Action Group (LAG) areas. However, LAGs could use their revenue allocation to source additional freelance support from out with their Local Authority where needed.
Area spend is ongoing and until all claims have been processed at the end of the financial year, an accurate figure cannot be given for staffing and resourcing costs.
The LAG allocation breakdown is provided in the following table;
LAG Area | Total allocation | Guideline A&A* |
Aberdeenshire North | £394,296.00 | £59,144.40 |
Aberdeenshire South | £530,694.00 | £79,604.10 |
Angus | £288,469.00 | £43,270.35 |
Argyll & Islands | £618,889.00 | £92,833.35 |
Ayrshire | £533,604.00 | £80,040.60 |
Cairngorms | £281,606.00 | £42,240.90 |
Dumfries and Galloway | £665,492.00 | £99,823.80 |
Fife | £279,306.00 | £41,895.90 |
Forth Valley and Lomond | £213,746.00 | £32,061.90 |
Greater Renfrewshire | £115,520.00 | £17,328.00 |
Highland | £1,069,878.00 | £160,481.70 |
Kelvin Valley and Falkirk | £140,600.00 | £21,090.00 |
Lanarkshire | £282,826.00 | £42,423.90 |
Moray | £292,405.00 | £43,860.75 |
Orkney | £188,330.00 | £28,249.50 |
Outer Hebrides | £255,806.00 | £38,370.90 |
Rural Perth and Kinross | £447,098.00 | £67,064.70 |
Scottish Borders | £487,275.00 | £73,091.25 |
Shetland | £188,538.00 | £28,280.70 |
Tyne Esk | £204,382.00 | £30,657.30 |
West Lothian | £151,240.00 | £22,686.00 |
*A&A = administration and animation
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-11899 by Mairi Gougeon on 17 November 2022, how many applications for funding from the Ayrshire Rural and Islands Ambition (ARIA) Fund indirectly included local authorities as beneficiaries, and how many, if any, progressed to the assessment stage.
Answer
There were no applications to the Ayrshire Rural and Islands Ambition (ARIA) Fund that indirectly included local authorities as beneficiaries.
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-12031 by Mairi Gougeon on 17 November 2022, which 16 organisations that applied to the Ayrshire Rural and Islands Ambition (ARIA) Fund progressed from the technical check stage to the assessment stage; which organisation failed the technical check process, and what the technical check was that it failed.
Answer
The outcome of the technical checks is detailed in the following table:
Project/Organisation | Decision |
Carbon Reduction – Adventure Centre for Education | Approved |
Dunlop Dairy Cheese Shop & Tasting Room | Deferred |
Disabled access plus Disabled Toilet and Additional Toilet – Hareshaw Community Hall SCIO | Approved |
Renewable Energy Infrastructure to New Tourist Accommodation Development – Millport, Jack Alt Stays | Approved |
Little Peru Green Start, Little Peru Ltd | Deferred |
The Community Regeneration of Millport Town Hall Ltd | Rejected |
Arran Green Funding for Future – Arran Pioneer CIC | Rejected |
Gaiety on Tour – Ayr Gaiety Partnership | Approved |
The Geisland Project – Beith CDT | Approved |
Access to Community for All – Crossroads Community Hubs Ltd | Approved |
Ailsa Craig Visitor Centre for Feasibility Study – Girvan Town Team (on behalf of Girvan Community Led Tourism) | Approved |
Brand Ambassador/Distillery Production Assistant – Isle of Cumbrae Distiller | Approved |
Paths Network Feasibility Study – Kirkimichael Village Renaissance | Deferred |
Newmilns Regeneration Feasibility Study – Newmilns Regeneration Association | Deferred |
Business Sustainability and Resilience Advisor – Visit Arran Ltd | Approved |
Opportunities for All – Crossroads Community Hub Ltd | Approved |
Where a project is noted as ‘deferred’ this means that a final decision by the LAG is pending.
The application for The Community Regeneration of Millport Town Hall Ltd was rejected due to:
- The lack of fit with the project itself (not completion of the town hall) and ARIA fund priorities. The Local Action Group considered the application did not make a strong enough link between the project and completion of the town hall to validate the priorities selected.
- There was concern over the fire safety aspects at such a late stage in the overall project.
The application for the Arran Green Funding for Future (Arran Pioneer CIC) was rejected due to:
- A lack of project outcomes being fully determined or specified.
- The Local Action Group questioned the eligibility of the project under the guidance requirement for technical/feasibility studies to fully determine the project outcome.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 06 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government how many road accidents, where a defective/poor road surface was recorded as a contributory factor, there have been in each of the last five years, broken down by local authority area.
Answer
In response to your query, my officials have provided the data below as requested.
The following table shows the number of accidents where a defective or poor road surface was a contributory factor.
Council | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
Aberdeen City | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Aberdeenshire | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Angus | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Argyll & Bute | 5 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
Clackmannanshire | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Dumfries & Galloway | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Dundee City | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
East Ayrshire | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
East Dunbartonshire | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
East Lothian | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
East Renfrewshire | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Edinburgh, City of | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Falkirk | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Fife | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
Glasgow City | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Highland | 7 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Midlothian | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Moray | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
North Ayrshire | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
North Lanarkshire | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Perth & Kinross | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Renfrewshire | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Scottish Borders | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
Shetland Islands | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
South Ayrshire | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
South Lanarkshire | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
Stirling | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
West Dunbartonshire | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
West Lothian | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Total | 49 | 50 | 38 | 23 | 34 |
The data in the table above is collected as part of the wider collation of data on road casualties, which informs our road safety publications. Statistical data on road casualties are reported annually by Transport Scotland in two publications, Key Reported Road Casualties in the Spring of each year, and Reported Road Casualties Scotland, in the Autumn of each year. Provisional figures for 2022 are not available yet.
- Asked by: Jamie Greene, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to deaths in custody determined to be suicides, in how many instances were (a) non-prescription and (b) illegal drugs found or suspected to be present in the deceased, including in cases where this was detected following a toxicology report, in each year since 2016.
Answer
The Scottish Prison Service publish information regarding all deaths in SPS custody on a quarterly basis, which includes the ‘medical certificate of cause of death’ (MCCD). However, data is not held by either the Scottish Government or the Scottish Prison Service on the number of instances of deaths in prison custody determined to be suicides involved non-prescription or illegal drugs found or suspected to be present in the deceased.
Steps are being taken through the implementation of the recommendations of the Independent Review of the Response to Deaths in Prison Custody to improve availability of data relating to deaths in prison custody.
- Asked by: Oliver Mundell, MSP for Dumfriesshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 20 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 22 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to ensure that additional support needs are being met and that specialist educational support is available in Gaelic-medium schools.
Answer
All children and young people should receive the support they need to reach their full potential.
Education authorities are legally responsible for identifying and meeting the additional support needs of their pupils, including any additional support needs of pupils receiving Gaelic-medium education. The Scottish Government has supported education authorities in the delivery of these duties through the preparation and publication of statutory guidance.
We are also working closely with local government partners, through the Additional Support for Learning Project Board , to ensure we continue to see progress with the delivery of the recommendations from the 2020 additional support for learning review. In November 2022, we published an updated action plan and progress report to further support improvement in the implementation of additional support for learning, including within Gaelic-medium education.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 20 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 22 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government how any funding, which had been set aside for the Community Land Scotland Gaelic Development Officer, will be used to encourage community-based decision making for Gaelic development, in light of reports that the Gaelic Development Officer post has been discontinued.
Answer
The Community Land Scotland Gaelic Development Officer was a partnership arrangement between Bòrd na Gidhlig and Community Land Scotland and any funding is a matter for their decision-making processes.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 20 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 22 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what information it has on the reasons for the post of Gaelic Development Officer at Community Land Scotland, which was established to extend the use of Gaelic within vernacular communities, reportedly being discontinued.
Answer
Community Land Scotland Gaelic Development Officer post was a pilot project that was run in partnership between Bòrd na Gidhlig and Community Land Scotland . This project is now being evaluated and the report is expected in February 2023. This evaluation report will help inform future funding initiatives in our Gaidhlig communities.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 20 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 22 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government how it plans to increase community engagement for strengthening Gaelic in communities, in light of reports that the post of Gaelic Development Officer at Community Land Scotland has been discontinued.
Answer
The Scottish Government has provided additional funding of £200k in 2021-22 and 2022-23 to Bòrd na Gidhlig to support the network of Gaelic Development Officers across Scotland. These officers are supporting the Gaelic communities by providing a range of c ommunity-based activities through a variety of different schemes.
The focus of Bòrd na Gidhlig’s evaluation review of the Community Land Scotland Gaelic Development Officer post is to develop, and put in place, a more comprehensive and sustainable framework for delivering community based developments in Ga elic . At the core of this framework is the move towards a multi year funding arrangement to better support the work of development officers and to strengthen the network of officers to maximise the benefit to their communities. There are currently a total of 58 officer posts that have been supported by the Bòrd in communities this financial year with an investment of over £1.1M.
- Asked by: Graham Simpson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 13 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 22 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what the qualifying criteria are for recipients of the St Andrew's Award for exceptional acts of bravery.
Answer
Thank you for your question. The criteria for emergency workers differ from that of the public. For emergency workers, the criteria are:
The individual (or team) acted beyond the normal expectation of them and made a deliberate decision to do so in the knowledge of the dangers / risks involved e.g., where the incident escalated unexpectedly beyond the initial assessment and the individual had to adapt their training or improvise to achieve the desired outcome.
The individual (or team) displayed outstanding bravery in the knowledge of significant risk or danger to their own life whilst protecting or attempting to protect another person. Consideration of the UK Gallantry Award System may also come into play in these situations.
The individual (or team) showed personal courage in the face of violent or unpredictable circumstances.
Where the individual (or team) made a significant contribution to reducing risk to the public and preventing future deaths or injuries.
Where an individual or team has gone beyond the expected contribution to their service and has through determination, innovation and persistent effort overcome obstacles resulting in a quantifiable contribution to public safety.