Official Report 279KB pdf
We move to item 5. As members might recall, we received a verbal indication from the Environment and Rural Development Committee of the idea that we would have some kind of joint inquiry into energy policy. We have since received and circulated a letter from the committee convener, Sarah Boyack, who goes nowhere near making such a suggestion. Basically, she is seeking information on our work programme. However, we have not firmed up the details of our work programme beyond February; I think that we agreed to consider our work programme in February, to cover work up to the pre-election period.
We could emphasise that we appreciate that energy policy has serious implications for enterprise and economy issues. I am concerned that we might be seen as too dismissive of such an important subject. I certainly would not like to convey such an impression.
No, not at all. The fact that the committee devoted a year and a half to its renewable energy inquiry, which took place before I became convener, indicates that it takes the matter seriously.
We should bear it in mind that renewable energy tends to refer to electricity.
Absolutely. I take your point.
Members indicated agreement.
We now move into private session.
Meeting continued in private until 16:25.