Official Report 256KB pdf
Scottish Network 2 Tourist Board Scheme Amendment Order 2004 (SSI/2004/465)
After two hours of meeting, we will now deal with agenda item 2. Nobody should read into that that there has been a reduction in our level of productivity, as three items were, in effect, dealt with under agenda item 1.
I do not think so, but I should explain that when the committee previously took evidence on the statutory instruments, members spoke to a colleague of mine, Lesley Fraser. Mairi Macpherson recently took over from Lesley Fraser, and she will be happy to answer any questions that members have. I thought that I would come with her, as I have been responsible for the entire project that members have just heard about and have an interest in the whole process. I was glad to hear the convener's suggestion at the end of the evidence session.
That was the bad news. The good news—
I wanted to say that I would be happy to answer any questions of fact that members have now, but that would be inappropriate.
We are not allowed to ask such questions, as we must give notice to the public. However, I am sure that you are delighted by my suggestion.
We are confident that everything is now in order.
Do members have any questions?
No, just to say that I am a member of the Subordinate Legislation Committee. We considered the order again and had drawn to our attention some things that we managed to miss when we first looked at it, which were the names of the area tourist boards and possibly the typo. However, we were content with the order when we considered it for the second time.
Is everybody content with the order?
I thank the witnesses. We look forward to seeing you again soon, John.
So do I.
Previous
Area Tourist Boards ReviewNext
Work Programme