Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…
Chamber and committees

Rural Development Committee, 27 Feb 2001

Meeting date: Tuesday, February 27, 2001


Contents


Petitions

The Convener:

The first item for consideration is petition PE272 from the National Farmers Union of Scotland, which should have been circulated to members. I am concerned that we are short on committee members, so although I am happy to discuss the petitions, I would also be content to defer any decisions until next week's meeting, when we will have broader representation, if members feel that that is appropriate.

Rhoda Grant:

If we are to delay any decisions, we should delay discussion as well, because we will just have to repeat ourselves next week. If we do not repeat ourselves, the people who are not here will not know what our views are. It will be a duplication to discuss the petitions and not make any decisions.

I am keen to emphasise that we have a quorum, and that we are entitled to deal with the petitions. However, if we feel that there are views that would be expressed by members who are not here, I would be keen to defer making decisions.

Mr Rumbles:

My view is straightforward. Representatives of all four political parties on the committee are present, but I also support the view that if we are going to defer taking decisions, we must defer discussion as well. Either we get on with it, or we do not.

Fergus Ewing:

I agree with Rhoda Grant. It would be better to defer substantive discussion until next week, because some members are not present. However, it would be quite easy for us to make some progress on the petition on the salmon farming industry, because it is obvious that we will want a response to that from the Executive.

Members:

We have that.

I am sorry. I hunted for a response. If I did not find it, mea culpa. Fair enough—obviously I have more reading to do.

I admit that the response took quite a bit of finding.

Do we agree to defer discussion on petition PE272 until next week's meeting?

Members indicated agreement.

The Convener:

We have several petitions that relate to the Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Bill. They have been brought together for consideration before we complete our stage 1 report. Are we content to take the same decision on those petitions as we did on PE272 and defer discussion to next week's meeting?

Members indicated agreement.

The next item on the agenda is discussion of the draft report on the Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Bill. We have agreed to take that in private.

Meeting continued in private until 14:45.