There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
6 September 2017
Education and Skills Committee 06 September 2017
As members know, the 2014 act was, in the case of the Christian Institute and Others v the Lord Advocate, challenged as being outside the Scottish Parliament’s legislative competence.
Official Report
Meeting date:
14 March 2017
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee 14 March 2017
The case in question is called Carmichael v Carmichael’s executrix. It was dealt with in the House of Lords and it is in the 1920 Session Cases.
Official Report
Meeting date:
7 December 2016
Meeting of the Parliament 07 December 2016
Paisley is also the setting for the famous court case of Donoghue v Stevenson, which sets out the basic criteria under Scots law for determining whether a duty of care exists.
Official Report
Meeting date:
4 March 2015
Meeting of the Parliament 04 March 2015
It does not meet the European requirements under the I v Finland case. Therefore, we have a situation in which, by using people’s unique identifier, others can maliciously access NHS data.
Official Report
Meeting date:
21 November 2013
Meeting of the Parliament 21 November 2013
What is he going to see—“Historic Day V” or “Honey I Shrunk the Fiscal Gap”?
SPICe briefings
Date published:
21 November 2019
The Children (Scotland) Bill
status=Temp&sfvrsn=0.29287373868232724</a> 3SM v CM. (2017). Cited as [2017] CSIH 1 (see especially paras 67-68).
Official Report
Meeting date:
8 December 2015
Meeting of the Parliament 08 December 2015
Following the decision in the case of Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate in 2010, the Scottish Government introduced by way of emergency legislation the Criminal Procedure (Legal Assistance, Detention and Appeals) (Scotland) Act 2010.
SPICe briefings
Date published:
6 March 2025
The Leases (Automatic Continuation etc.) (Scotland) Bill
PRESS SUMMARY Marks and Spencer plc (Appellant) v BNP Paribas Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited and another (Respondents) .
Official Report
Meeting date:
7 October 2014
Meeting of the Parliament 07 October 2014
The inherent power of the court to deal with vexatious proceedings was recognised by Lord Reed in the case of the Lord Advocate v Andrew McNamara, on which he observed that “an action might be dismissed as incompetent if it was not brought for a legitimate purpose.”
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
16 June 2010
S3W-34175
Birds of prey and red grouse. London: Stationery Office. Reif, V., Jungell, S., Korpimaki, E., Tornberg, R. and Mykra, S., 2004.
