This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
Although the Government’s aim to save lives is laudable, it must not take advantage of people’s inaction. That is unethical.The Christian Institute, written submission
Dr Macdonald from CARE for Scotland highlighted what he saw as an unintended consequence of deemed authorisation – a potential increase in the number of people actively choosing to opt-out of the system.
Devolved powers available to support physical activity provision in Scotland
Whilst significant challenges exist in addressing such issues in the 25 years since devolution, the powers available to the Scottish Government have gradually increased.
We have also recently launched a pilot project in Fife to provide more in-depth analysis and insight into how to engage with and motivate economically inactive individuals in the community. 1 Last week’s report by the Office for Budget Responsibility laid bare the scale of the challenge of economic inactivity and how it has been driven by the rise of long-term sickness/health related inactivity since the start of the pandemic.
Committee reports
Date published:
28 September 2022
A lot of cross-ministerial dialogue was involved to get to that point—probably more than should be needed, but it was necessary in order to get across all those compartments.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
30 December 2024
This is available at: Economic inactivity in Scotland: supporting those with longer-term health conditions and disabilities to remain economically active.
This relationship holds true particularly among the inactive population. That is, those who are inactive are more likely to attribute their inactivity to poor health or disability when they have faced reduced access to public healthcare in the year prior.