Does the committee also wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground (h)—“meaning could be clearer”—in that the definition in rule 1 of “respondent” could be clearer as to the types of appeal to which it relates, and that rule 20 could be clearer as regards whether the tribunal may make an order awarding expenses as taxed or whether it can award only a specified sum, and as regards what expenses the award may cover, given the different provision in this regard made in subparagraphs (3) and (5)?