There are 1,738 results relating to "Ž"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
23 February 2010
Rural Affairs and Environment Committee 23 February 2010
If the agreed plan simply says, “We’re not going to do very much,” it will not cost very much, but if it says, “We’re going to do X, Y and Z,” which will mean dealing with hundreds more cases of various kinds, it will clearly cost a great deal more.
Official Report
Meeting date:
17 March 2010
Local Government and Communities Committee 17 March 2010
Yes, but the issue is that even if a collective agreement is reached at the Scottish joint council that you will do X, Y and Z, any individual claimant can still say that that agreement does not meet their aims and objectives and does not deal with their issues properly.
Official Report
Meeting date:
24 February 2009
Equal Opportunities Committee, 24 Feb 2009
Could you focus on even one of the policy objectives or outcomes and say, "This may cost you X, Y or Z?" Could you put that in your report as well?
Official Report
Meeting date:
26 February 2008
Equal Opportunities Committee, 26 Feb 2008
It is quite difficult to do that, but we think that it is important. People say X, Y and Z about the types of jobs that graduates go into, but if we can provide more robust tracking of graduates generally, we should also be able to identify where those with a disclosed disability are.
Committee reports
Date published:
24 February 2026
Cairngorm funicular railway
The decision would depend on who and why they were using it.
The next generation (gen z) are interested in connections to nature but the business model does not provide this.
Committee reports
Date published:
4 June 2018
PE1603: Ensuring greater scrutiny, guidance and consultation on armed forces visits to schools in Scotland
Annexe B: Written evidence submitted to the Committee
Below is a list of all written evidence submitted to the Committee in relation to this petition:
PE1603/A: Dundee City Council Letter of 22 September 2016
PE1603/B: North Lanarkshire Council Letter of 26 September 2016
PE1603/C: Angus Council Letter of 27 September 2016
PE1603/D: East Dunbartonshire Council Letter of 29 September 2016
PE1603/E: Glasgow City Council Letter 4 October 2016
PE1603/F: East Ayrshire Council Letter of 5 October 2016
PE1603/G: Argyll and Bute Council Letter of 6 October 2016
PE1603/H: Aberdeen City Council Letter of 7 September 2016
PE1603/I: AHDS Email of 7 September 2016
PE1603/J: Renfrewshire Council Letter of 10 October 2016
PE1603/K: East Renfrewshire Council Email of 11 October 2016
PE1603/L: South Lanarkshire Council of 11 October 2016
PE1603/M: Stirling Council Letter of 12 October 2016
PE1603/N: Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland Letter of 13 October 2016
PE1603/O: Scottish Government Letter of 14 October 2016
PE1603/P: Scottish Youth Parliament Letter of 21 October 2016
PE1603/Q: Minister of State for the Armed Forces Letter of 1 November 2016
PE1603/R: North Ayrshire Council Letter of 7 November 2016
PE1603/S: Petitioner Letter of 11 November 2016
PE1603/T: Young Scots for Independence Letter of 9 January 2017
PE1603/U: Minister of State for the Armed Forces Letter of 4 January 2017
PE1603/V: Together Scotland Letter of 11 January 2017
PE1603/W: Justice and Peace Commission of the Catholic Bishop's Conference of Scotland Letter of 12 January 2017
PE1603/X: Medact Letter of 12 January 2017
PE1603/Y: Women's International League for Peace and Freedom (Scottish Branch) Letter of 12 January 2017
PE1603/Z...
Official Report
Meeting date:
9 February 2011
Rural Affairs and Environment Committee 09 February 2011
So, should we have a sophisticated means of differentiating that is based on areas of field X, Y and Z, or should we have something that is a bit more to do with activity, which is what the top-up payment is driving at?
Official Report
Meeting date:
1 October 2008
Scottish Commission for Public Audit, 01 Oct 2008
Would you expect to have a written document saying that the chair's role is to do X, Y and Z? That would be helpful to a number of sectors.
Official Report
Meeting date:
12 March 2008
Plenary, 12 Mar 2008
The board should say, "This is the problem about which we want to consult the public", and the board could then give options X, Y and Z, based on evidence A, B and C. The independent scrutiny panel would then consider the evidence that the board had produced, and possibly say, "Yes, that is a reasonable body of evidence for the changes."
Official Report
Meeting date:
23 January 2008
Rural Affairs and Environment Committee, 23 Jan 2008
That leads to a situation in which we could be criticised for what looks like a disproportionate spend per head of population—that appearance is absolutely correct, because we can consider the whole country and say that we need to spend more per head in X, Y and Z than we do elsewhere because that is where the need is.One advantage that we have is that our ...
