This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
That advice recorded that there had been further discussions with CMAL following the chair's email of 26 September; and indeed CMAL had had further negotiations with FMEL.
In the debate, we have rehearsed a lot of arguments that have been made previously. I will pick up on three points and take a constructive tone. First, Mr Briggs talked about a fiscal framework.
Several options are on the table from various members across the chamber. I point to amendment 200, in my name, which talks about a review of the scope of accreditation, which would provide the orderly change that Willie Rennie talked about.
I am open to doing whatever Parliament asks us to do, although I point out that it is not for Governments to talk about individual institutions and so on.
When blood supply is cut off part of the brain – brain cells – die fairly quickly. Key thing about responding to a stroke is doing so as quickly as possible.
Amendment 42 moved—Paul Wheelhouse—and agreed to. Section 26, as amended, agreed to. After section 26 Amendment 43 moved—Paul Wheelhouse—and agreed to.
The proposal was accompanied by a summary of consultation responses, which is accessible online via the website page referred to above. The summary, and individual responses, may also be viewed in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe).
I respect Carol Mochan very much, but I disagree vigorously with her on that point. We value the NHS workforce—we do not just talk the talk on that, but put our money where our mouth is.