- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 13 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 16 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to review the legal framework that currently does not classify fish escapes from salmon farms as a statutory offence.
Answer
In our response to the recent report by the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, we committed to prioritising progress to introduce penalties for fish farm escapes in 2026-2027 and to publishing a revised Technical Standard for Scottish Finfish Aquaculture in 2027-2028.
The escape of fish from a fish farm is not a statutory offence. However, the Fish Health Inspectorate assesses whether satisfactory measures are in place on farms for the containment of fish. Where they are not, Scottish Ministers may serve an enforcement notice and failure to comply with this is an offence.
- Asked by: Pam Gosal, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 16 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what the total amount is that has been spent to date on the For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers case.
Answer
- Asked by: Emma Roddick, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 16 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to introduce statutory financial penalties for (a) large-scale salmon escapes and (b) environmental non-compliance within the salmon farming sector, in line with international standards
Answer
In our response to Rural Affairs and Islands Committee Salmon Farming in Scotland report, we committed to prioritising progress to introduce penalties for fish farm escapes in 2026-2027.
In terms of environmental non-compliance, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency has powers to issue fixed and variable monetary penalties. Further details can be found on SEPA’s website: Enforcement | Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA).
- Asked by: Russell Findlay, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 16 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will lay before Parliament the Fitness for Judicial Office Tribunal report relating to part-time sheriff John Halley.
Answer
A tribunal was constituted under section 21 of the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 to investigate and report on whether Part-time Sheriff Halley is unfit to hold judicial office. Under Section 24(2) of that Act, the First Minister must lay the report of the tribunal before the Scottish Parliament. The First Minister is currently making the necessary arrangements for the report to be laid before the Scottish Parliament within the next two weeks.
- Asked by: Paul O'Kane, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 29 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 16 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has conducted any analysis of the appropriate level of payment for Funeral Support Payment since its introduction in 2019.
Answer
The Funeral Support Payment helps towards funeral costs, it is not intended to cover the full cost of a funeral.
There is a statutory duty to uprate the payment annually in line with inflation, unlike the UK Government equivalent which does not increase annually.
The Scottish Government published the Funeral Support Payment evaluation in July 2022, which found that the payment reduced the need for people to borrow money to arrange a funeral.
We are committed to continually improving Scottish benefits and last year made improvements to the payment, further supporting bereaved people.
- Asked by: Pam Gosal, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 16 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an outline of the legal advice that it received for the For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers case.
Answer
The content of any legal advice is confidential.
- Asked by: Pam Gosal, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 16 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether any civil servants were involved in any work related to the For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers case.
Answer
Civil servants were involved in work related to For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers as part of their role to support and advise Ministers.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kate Forbes on 16 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-36135 by Kate Forbes on 10 April 2025, whether it will approach the UK Government and BAE Systems regarding becoming a partner in the Type 26 Norway frigate campaign, in light of the potential industrial opportunity it presents for Scotland.
Answer
Public sources of information indicate that BAE Systems is among the contenders to supply new frigates for the Royal Norwegian Navy. No discussions have taken place between BAE Systems, the UK Government and the Scottish Government on partnership in the Type 26 Norway frigate campaign. However, given the potential industrial and employment opportunities for Scotland are significant, officials from the UK and Scottish Governments have held constructive informal discussions around how the bid might be best supported.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 16 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a breakdown of all the court actions (a) initiated and (b) defended by the Scottish Ministers since 2007, and, for each, what the (i) total cost, broken down by (A) internal staff costs and (B) external legal fees and (ii) outcome was.
Answer
This information is not held centrally. The information requested could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Allan on 16 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what information it has on the proportion of new wind farm consents granted since 1 January 2022 that include legally enforceable conditions requiring (a) bird-strike monitoring, (b) adaptive management plans and (c) financial bonds for remedial action.
Answer
In respect of offshore wind farms, three consents have been issued since 1 January 2022. All three have requirements for ornithological monitoring via a condition for a Project Environmental Monitoring Programme (PEMP). In the event that further potential adverse environmental effects are identified, for which no predictions were made in the application, the Scottish Ministers may require the developer to undertake additional monitoring through the PEMP condition.
All information related to determinations made by Scottish Ministers in respect of onshore wind farm developments, including related conditions, is publicly available on our Energy Consents website: Scottish Government - Energy Consents Unit - Application Search . In cases where deemed planning permission is granted, any conditions of that deemed planning permission would be discharged by the Planning Authority.