- Asked by: Stephanie Callaghan, MSP for Uddingston and Bellshill, Scottish National Party
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 05 April 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kevin Stewart on 25 April 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether the development and wellbeing assessment tool currently being piloted by South Lanarkshire Health and Social Care Partnership could be a viable and cost-effective option to reduce screening waiting times for young people with suspected neurodevelopmental conditions.
Answer
The Scottish Government’s understanding is that the wellbeing assessment tool being piloted by South Lanarkshire Health and Social Care Partnership called the Autism Resource Co-ordination Hub (ARCH), is a support service for children, young people, adults and their families. It is not intended to replace services already provided by health, education or social work with regard to assessment, diagnosis or treatment of neurodevelopmental conditions.
The Scottish Government is committed to implementing the National Neurodevelopmental Specification: Principles and Standards of Care for Children and Young People, published in September 2021, which specifies service standards that all children’s services should follow, to ensure access to support is effective and consistent across Scotland. The ARCH service complements existing services and the Principles and Standards set out in the Neurodevelopmental Specification by providing the support provided by universal services, and the neurodevelopmental assessment pathway provided by NHS Lanarkshire community paediatrics and Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS).
To support improvements across Scotland, £3.06 million was allocated to NHS Boards in 2021-22 to build professional capacity within Boards to support children and young people with neurodevelopmental support needs.
In March 2022, Scottish Government also provided over £750,000 to five local authority areas to run tests of change on the implementation of the Neurodevelopmental Specification. These tests will run over the next six months and will provide learning and evaluation to be shared across other local authorities and health board areas to inform and assist national implementation of the Specification.
- Asked by: Mercedes Villalba, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 05 April 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 25 April 2022
To ask the Scottish Government when the findings of the work to make an informed policy decision on the contribution of North Sea production to the global climate emergency and to Scotland’s economy, security and wellbeing, as outlined in the Scottish Government and Scottish Green Party Shared Policy Programme, will be published.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-07862 on 25 April 2022. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 08 April 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Humza Yousaf on 25 April 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to publish data on performance against clinical prioritisation, to enable greater transparency on how NHS boards manage waiting lists, and if this is the case, when it will do so.
Answer
We are committed to being open and transparent about data on waiting times performance, including against the Clinical Prioritisation Framework, that was developed to provide guidance to all NHS Boards around prioritising their planned care waiting lists throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Data that is published on Waiting Times performance is subject to continual review, development and quality assurance by PHS, the holders of this data.
PHS plans to publish statistics on Clinical Prioritisation for the first time early September 2022, this will be specific to patients waiting for treatment as an inpatient or day case who are covered by the Treatment Time Guarantee.
PHS, with support from the Scottish Government, will continue to work with NHS Boards to improve the completeness and quality of the data to ensure the data is sufficiently robust to be released as official statistics on the scheduled date.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 11 April 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 25 April 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what assistance is available to help people meet the costs of charging mobility scooters in light of rising energy prices and the reported cost of living crisis.
Answer
We know that the recent increases in energy prices we have seen will be concerning to many consumers including those using mobility scooters. Whilst the Scottish Government does not have powers over the setting of energy prices, we have looked to provide assistance where we can.
As part of our wider £290m package of funding announcements made to tackle the cost of living crisis, we have committed a further £10m to continue our Fuel Insecurity Fund from April to help households at risk of self-disconnection, or self-rationing their energy use, due to unaffordable fuel costs.
We are also making financial support for disabled people and people with long term health conditions more straightforward to access. Through the introduction of Adult Disability Payment, we are providing a new, simplified, compassionate system that will treat people with dignity, fairness and respect. The application process has been designed with disabled people to make sure it is as clear as possible. People can apply in the way that’s best for them, either online, by post, over the phone or face-to-face.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 06 April 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kevin Stewart on 25 April 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-07414 by Kevin Stewart on 1 April 2022, when the next review of remaining recommendations in adult care homes will take place.
Answer
Guidance is regularly reviewed and updated based on clinical evidence. Scottish Government Officials and clinicians continue to work with Public Health Scotland (PHS) and Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infection (ARHAI) Scotland, as has been done throughout the pandemic, to review protective measures within adult and older people care homes.
Self-isolation, testing, outbreak management and infection prevention and control measures are currently under review with any updates to guidance anticipated in May.
The last formal review prior to this took place in March, with updates to guidance implemented from April.
- Asked by: Oliver Mundell, MSP for Dumfriesshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 11 April 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kate Forbes on 25 April 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-07650 by Mairi Gougeon on 4 April 2022, what steps were taken to ensure that any required agricultural expertise was represented on the board of South of Scotland Enterprise.
Answer
South of Scotland Enterprise (SOSE) advertised for four new Board members in Autumn 2021. Applicants were asked to demonstrate evidence of their skills, knowledge and experience in one of three areas: land based industries; governance/strategic management; or digital transformation. On 15 February 2022, the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and the Economy announced the appointments, with two of the successful candidates having extensive expertise in land based industries. In addition, two existing members of the Board have knowledge of agricultural matters.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 22 April 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding the Final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment for its Deposit Return Scheme, published in 2021, and the increase in business costs for an additional half a billion containers within the scheme, from table 1 to table 2, of £34 million, in light of this being a 3% cost increase associated with a 23% increase in containers, how this cost was calculated, and how distance takeback services from online retailers have been factored into the calculations for the additional half a billion containers in the market place.
Answer
The economic model underpinning the figures in the amended final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment takes account of a number of factors and costs and benefits do not necessarily increase in proportion to the change in input.
The modelled cost increase reflects the likelihood that there will be additional capacity within the system for return points to handle additional containers and the possibility of an increase in the frequency of collection rather than requiring additional reverse vending machines (RVMs). This would lead to additional running costs and staff time but not costs for additional RVMs. The scheme administrator is responsible for setting a suitable logistics schedule with retailers at an agreed frequency for the collection of materials, aligned with the capacity of the RVM and individual store requirements.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 22 April 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding the Final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment for its Deposit Return Scheme, published in 2021, and the statements regarding local authority benefits as a result of half a billion containers being removed from local authorities, what its position is on whether such a removal of containers would represent a reduction in benefits for local authorities.
Answer
In calculating the impact of our Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) on local authorities, the economic model in the final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment (BRIA) uses compositional data on the tonnage (‘dirty’ weights) that Local Authorities actually manage, both recycled and in the residual waste stream, rather than the number of containers placed on the market. This aligns with the (weight-related) costs local authorities actually incur.
Hence the benefit to local authorities set out in table 3 of the amended final BRIA does not change in the sensitivity analysis presented in Annex F. The amended final BRIA can be reviewed here: A Deposit Return Scheme for Scotland: Final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment (BRIA) (www.gov.scot) .
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 22 April 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding the Final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment for its Deposit Return Scheme, published in 2021, which includes an additional half a billion containers within the scheme and additional 20,000 return points, which is a 118% increase on its initial estimate of the number of return points, for what reason there is no corresponding increase in costs to reflect this.
Answer
The cost increases within the model are not proportional increases. There may be additional collections but there is also additional capacity within the system.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 22 April 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding the Final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment for its Deposit Return Scheme, published in 2021, in light of it including an additional half a billion containers within the scheme and additional 20,000 return points, how it was calculated that the costs to regulators will remain the same, and how this calculation has been validated.
Answer
The cost to the regulator is estimated based on the number of businesses to be regulated; it is therefore unaffected by any increase in the number of containers.