Chamber and committees

We are aiming for a non-commercially sensitive contract to be available for publication by Summer 2022, once the necessary administrative work has been completed.

At present no assessment has been made by the Scottish Government in relation to the Dog’s Trust recommendations.

However, it should be noted that the Scottish Government, in conjunction with the Animal Health Protection Agency (APHA), UK Government and other devolved administrations already operates a robust pet travel checking regime for animals entering the country. All non-commercial dogs, cats and ferrets entering Scotland currently under the Pet Travel rules have to undergo 100% documentary and identity checks by authorised pet checkers.

Scotland’s authorised pet checkers are trained by APHA prior to being granted approval, and receive annual audits of their checking and processing to ensure they uphold the requirements of the Pet Travel rules. They also receive regular training and work as part of a wider APHA network to identify trends in non-compliance and additional training requirements.

Pet checkers will refuse travel or share intelligence with the APHA who can intercept at the port/border if non-compliance is suspected.

In January 2021, the First Minister announced an additional investment of £250 million to tackle drug deaths, £100 million of which was allocated to develop residential rehabilitation services and associated aftercare over the next five years. Alongside this, the Scottish Government provided Alcohol and Drug Partnerships (ADPs) with a £13.5 million uplift per year, over the next five years, £5 million of which has been allocated to support additional residential rehabilitation capacity across Scotland. However, this uplift did not start until the 2021-2022 financial year.

Public Health Scotland (PHS) has published an interim monitoring report on statutory funded residential rehabilitation placements between 1 April 2021 to 30 September 2021. The figures for the Highlands and Islands region are as follows:

Argyll and Bute 9 placements (total cost £78,111),

Highland 48 placements (£222,797),

Shetland number of placements unavailable due to data suppression (£29,450).

Orkney and the Western Isles submitted nil returns.

Public Health Scotland are due to release a further monitoring report on statutory funded placement figures in April 2022, which will cover the period of October to December 2021.

The Strategic Environmental Assessment Addendum, published on 14 December 2021, shows that our Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) will increase the quantity of glass recyclate by more than 1.3 megatonnes over 25 years. It is available here: Supporting documents - A Deposit Return Scheme for Scotland: Strategic Environmental Assessment Addendum - gov.scot (www.gov.scot) .

I understand that Circularity Scotland Ltd intends to collect and transport glass separately from other materials under Scotland’s DRS. This will reduce contamination which is currently a problem with glass collected at the kerbside. I am therefore confident that our DRS will significantly increase the quality of glass recyclate.

I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-07100 on 18 March 2022. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers .

I have not had any meetings with British Glass regarding Scotland’s Deposit Return Scheme (DRS). We engaged frequently with British Glass during the policy-development process for DRS, and the former Cabinet Secretary for the Environment, Climate Change, and Land Reform met them on 8 January 2020 in advance of laying the regulations to establish the scheme.

Our Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) is complementary to extended producer responsibility (EPR) for packaging, which we are working with the other UK administrations to introduce. Both DRS and packaging EPR will drive higher recycling rates for glass, creating a significant opportunity for the Scottish glass reprocessing industry.

On 1 February £4m of additional funding was announced to boost in-person Easter study support provision in schools and colleges. This funding should allow schools and colleges – or local authorities through authority-wide initiatives – to offer targeted sessions for learners over the Easter break, particularly for those from the most deprived backgrounds. Where an existing Easter study offer already exists, this funding could allow schools or colleges to broaden their existing offer for targeted learners or, through promotion, encourage those learners to attend existing sessions.

In addition, the National e-Learning offer continues to deliver a strong package of resources for learners, teachers and practitioners. This includes a supported study programme with real time webinars and nearly 3,000 on-demand recorded lessons for the senior phase during the academic year and an online Easter study support programme offering over 60 courses. Senior phase learners from all 32 local authorities are accessing these opportunities.

Protecting Scotland’s marine environment is of paramount importance to the Scottish Government. I am aware of the recent trials conducted by the Danish Navy into the deflagration method of Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) disposal, and look forward to the data analysis.

The Scottish Government has recently signed a joint interim position statement together with other regulators and statutory nature conservation bodies. This statement sets out the Scottish Government's support for the use of lower noise alternatives to UXO disposal, and the expectation that licensees applying for a marine licence and European Protected Species Licence should prioritise low noise alternatives.

The collection of high quality data, including that from the trials conducted by the Danish Navy, will enable the Scottish Government, with support from NatureScot, to make evidence based decisions and recommendations around the use of alternative technologies.

The amount of funding allocated to, and paid to successful applicants to the Forestry Grant Scheme in each year from 2016 to 2021 is shown in Table 1.

Claimed grant is normally lower than the total grant award as a result of contracts that were not delivered on time due to a range of circumstances including weather conditions during the planting season, succession of land ownership during the contract delivery period and requests for contract variation to subsequent years.