- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 24 November 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 5 December 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions it has had regarding the presence of COVID-19 warnings in official communications since the final lifting of restrictions.
Answer
Scottish Government guidance is reviewed and updated regularly to ensure that information for the public and workplaces aligns to current policy. Policy is driven by the latest data, evidence and expert advice and is reflected in the communication of guidance. Throughout the pandemic public health advice on a range of complementary protective measures has been provided. When restrictions were in place (up to April 2022) advice was in place through guidance to support understanding and adherence of restrictions. Since the lifting of restrictions, guidance offers practical, risk-based advice on how to build infection resilience to respiratory infections including COVID-19, for individuals and workplaces. Any change in response will be driven by the data and evidence gathered, as well as expert advice.
- Asked by: Katy Clark, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 23 November 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 5 December 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether its position on ending the mandatory wearing of face masks in healthcare and social care settings is being kept under review in response to COVID-19 infection rates across Scotland.
Answer
The Scottish Government has a robust process in place for creating, updating and withdrawing COVID-19 guidance. The extended use of face masks and face coverings guidance across health and social care settings was withdrawn on 16 May 2023. This followed advice from Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infection (ARHAI) Scotland and Public Health Scotland (PHS) that health and social care settings should revert to the National Infection Prevention and Control Manual and the Care Home Infection Prevention and Control Manual. Both manuals hold personal protective equipment guidance based on clinical need and risk assessment.
ARHAI Scotland and PHS continue to monitor and analyse COVID-19 data, including variants, hospital clusters and deaths. This is considered alongside reviews of the current scientific literature. The Scottish Government regularly reviews this information together with any new emerging evidence. Any change to guidance would consider the epidemiological context and the latest scientific evidence and is continually under review.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 November 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 5 December 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the finding in the Kidney Care UK report, Home Dialysis Energy Reimbursement in Scotland, that, while there are more people with kidney disease on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) than home haemodialysis (HHD), "only four of the 14 Health Boards in Scotland currently have an APD energy reimbursement policy".
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-23097 on 4 December 2023. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers .
- Asked by: Murdo Fraser, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 November 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Claire Baker (on behalf of the SPCB) on 5 December 2023
To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body whether it will publish all correspondence between Michael Matheson and SPCB staff regarding his expenses claim for roaming charges in Morocco.
Answer
The Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body announced on 23 November that it will undertake an investigation in line with its duties under the MSP code of conduct.
As stated then, in the interests of fairness to all, and to avoid prejudicing our investigation, the Corporate Body will not comment on any matters that could have a bearing on the process. It is important to stress, however, that the Corporate Body remains wholly committed to openness and transparency and will release all material that it can, when it can, in line with its legal obligations.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 24 November 2023
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 5 December 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether it accepted advice from officials to use the £30 million of Barnett consequential funding through the Moving on Fund in a way that recognises housing pressures in the round, rather than looking at support for Ukrainians and homelessness housing needs separately.
Answer
Scottish Government wrote to local authorities on 12 September confirming the strategic objective, distribution methodology and individual allocations of the £30 million fund. The distribution methodology, agreed with local authority leaders, is based 50% on the number of displaced people from Ukraine in each local authority area and 50% on the adjusted Strategic Housing Investment Framework (SHIF) indicator formula that is used for distributing homelessness prevention funding.
While there is an expectation that this funding will help councils support displaced Ukrainians into longer-term accommodation and reduce the risk of homelessness, the funding is not ring-fenced, and local authorities are able to exercise full discretion locally to support other groups. This is in line with the Verity House Agreement and recognises that local authorities are best placed to allocate their resources to meet competing demands for their services.
The letter has been published and is available at: https://www.gov.scot/publications/ukraine-resettlement-letter-to-local-authorities-about-funding/
- Asked by: Mercedes Villalba, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 24 November 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 5 December 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how many people are directly employed in the public sector to undertake peatland restoration work, broken down by public body employer.
Answer
The total number of FTE staff (rounded to the nearest whole number) employed in the public sector, within the Peatland Action programme, to undertake peatland restoration work – as of November 2023 – is as follows:
- NatureScot – 56
- Forestry and Land Scotland – 23
- Cairngorms National Park Authority – 8
- Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority – 5
- Scottish Water – 3
- Scottish Government – 4
Total – 9
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 24 November 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 5 December 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions it has had regarding the content of COVID-19 warnings used in official communications, in particular in relation to the emphasis on "clean hands" and "two metres distance" and the lack of mention of ventilation, since the emergence of evidence that COVID-19 primarily spreads via aerosols and not fomites.
Answer
Scottish Government guidance is reviewed and updated regularly to ensure that information for the public and workplaces aligns to current policy. Policy is driven by the latest data, evidence and expert advice and is reflected in the communication of guidance. Throughout the pandemic public health advice on a range of complementary protective measures - including good hand hygiene, physical distancing, social mixing and improved ventilation – has been consistently deployed in response to the stage of the pandemic, to reduce risk from all transmission routes and support infection resilience to COVID-19.
- Asked by: Graham Simpson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 23 November 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 5 December 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what consideration it has given to mandating financial rewards to communities that host critical energy generation or transmission infrastructure.
Answer
Electricity regulation, generation, transmission and distribution are reserved to the UK Government. This means that mandating financial benefits for communities through the consents process is beyond the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament. However we have pressed the UK Government to take action in this area on many occasions, in terms of transmission and generation infrastructure.
While we welcome the UK Government’s announcements on providing energy bill discounts and wider community benefit from upgrades to the electricity transmission network, Scottish Ministers will continue to press the UK Government to explore making such benefits for transmission and generation mandatory, subject to full consultation. I have written to the UK Secretary of State this week to urge the UK Government to ensure there is meaningful engagement with the Scottish Government as these proposals are developed.
Despite the powers to mandate being reserved, community benefits are well-established in Scotland with our national Community Benefits Register indicating that over £25 million worth of community benefits were committed from renewable energy projects in the last 12 months. We continue to explore different avenues within devolved powers that will build on the successes of our Good Practice Principles, the Onshore Wind Sector Deal, and work to develop a solar deployment ambition.
- Asked by: Katy Clark, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 23 November 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 5 December 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether it undertook a health and safety assessment before taking the decision to end the mandatory wearing of face masks in healthcare and social care settings.
Answer
The Scottish Government has a robust process in place for creating, updating and withdrawing COVID-19 guidance. The health and safety of health and social care workers continues to be at the forefront of our approach in developing policies and guidance. However, it is important to note that the extended use of facemask guidance was never mandatory, and NHS Boards have responsibility for Health and Safety assessments in the workplace in an operational context.
The withdrawal followed advice from Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infection (ARHAI) Scotland and Public Health Scotland (PHS) that health and social care settings should revert to the National Infection Prevention and Control Manual and the Care Home Infection Prevention and Control Manual. Both manuals hold personal protective equipment guidance based on clinical need and risk assessment.
This recommendation was supported by the Scottish Government’s Infection, Prevention and Control (IPC) Professional Advisors. The Scottish Government also has a Professional Advisory Group of experts from across the health and social care sectors who were asked to give their expert opinion on the recommendation to withdraw the extended guidance and were supportive of this change.
The Chief Nursing Officer, Chief Medical Officer, National Clinical Director and other Health and Social Care Directors were content with the advice based on the ARHAI Scotland review, the expert opinion of IPC and health and social care advisors, and consideration of the pandemic context.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 November 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jackson Carlaw (on behalf of the SPCB) on 5 December 2023
To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body whether it will provide an overview of the training programmes and opportunities that are currently available to MSP staff within the allocated £40,000 central budget.
Answer
The
SPCB can confirm that following consultation with MSP staff on training via, a training needs analysis, interviews and
engagement forums, a bespoke development programme has been established,
specifically for MSP staff. There are a number of training modules open to all
MSP staff, covering a variety of development areas and these are all detailed
on the intranet pages which all colleagues have access to. MSP staff can
book into and participate in any programme relevant to their role if agreed by
their employing MSP. This year the SPCB have listened to what MSP staff
colleagues are telling us they need and have therefore made significant
investment in training on Mental Health First Aid, Speechwriting, ACAS ‘Training
for Managers’ and UK/Scottish Benefits from the £40,000 central budget so
far.
In
addition to training offered via the central budget MSP staff can also access
additional training that is open to both SPS and MSP staff via our e-learning
platform ‘Learning Pool’ and ad hoc online and in person sessions that run
throughout the year.
The
SPCB is keen to maximise the central budget to the benefit of all MSP staff and
in doing so ensure economies of scale. Whilst requests for specialist
individual training can be made these are considered in the context of the
wider MSP staffing group to ensure that equal and fair access to training is
offered and that we can offer training that represents value for money and
delivers economies of scale. MSPs may also apply to the SPCB direct for
reimbursement of the fees or other charges incurred in providing appropriate
training for a member of staff. MSPs wishing to access this provision of
the Members’ Expenses Scheme will be assisted to do so by People and Culture
staff.