- Asked by: Jamie Halcro Johnston, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 November 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 1 December 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether any applications to the Future Farming Investment Scheme have been (a) processed, (b) deemed ineligible, (c) not approved and (d) approved based solely, or mainly, on scrutiny undertaken by automation or by a computer.
Answer
As outlined in the answer to question S6W-42042 on 1 December 2025, computers were used to process applications, as they are with all agricultural grant applications. However, the assessment work was led by the Agricultural Development Team, supported by staff from across the RPID area office network, which is experienced in delivering Scottish Government grant schemes. Independent validation was undertaken by a Project Board, which also included RPID Area Office representatives, as well as being reviewed by Internal Audit representatives. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Jamie Halcro Johnston, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 November 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 1 December 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a breakdown of the weighting for each category, and the priority used, to determine applications to the Future Farming Investment Scheme.
Answer
With over 19,000 capital investments applied for we do not intend to publish a breakdown of the weighting or scoring used for each capital item.
The application assessment involved three stages. Firstly, checks were carried out to confirm business eligibility and the accuracy of the information provided against existing business information held by RPID.
The proposed investments were then assessed for clarity of description and scored against their alignment with the scheme’s objectives and public benefit. Applications that were vague, incomplete, or inconsistent with RPID records were not considered.
Finally, a funding request score ensured the limited budget was shared fairly by rewarding realistic and proportionate requests, with safeguards in place so that new entrants, young farmers, small businesses, and tenants were not disadvantaged. This ensured that funding was directed to the strongest proposals offering the greatest overall benefit in terms of delivering the schemes objectives.
- Asked by: Jamie Halcro Johnston, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 November 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 1 December 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a list of all ineligible applications received for the Future Farming Investment Scheme to date, broken down by the (a) reason for ineligibility and (b) local area office, and stating how many such applications there were in each category, and what percentage of the total number of applications received this represents.
Answer
We intend to publish the details on how many applications did not pass each stage of the assessment process. Applicants will be able to review this information alongside the details they submitted, to help them understand the reason their application was not successful.
- Asked by: Jamie Halcro Johnston, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 November 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 1 December 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what information it has on the reasons for any applications to the Future Farming Investment Scheme not being approved.
Answer
There were many reasons why applications were not considered eligible for grant supporting. These were:
- One or more items applied for not fundable (multiple unrelated items applied for as a single entry/incomplete description/no supporting animals for item/no lengths, areas etc.)
- Application email provided was not valid
- Business declared their business didn't deliver any of the Scottish Governments Vision for Agriculture
- Failed the Active Farmer/Crofter BPS test
- No other Support Scheme Claims
- No Single Application Form Submitted
- Not Registered & Approved for Funding
- Didn't Comply With Whole Farm Plan requirements for BPS
- Payment Holds Applied To Business
- Agricultural Area Less than 3 hectares
- Previous Capital Grant Scheme Claim Refused
- Declared New Entrant but evidence showed not meeting FFIS definition
- Declared Young Farmer but evidence showed not meeting FFIS definition
- Declared Organic Land but evidence showed not meeting FFIS definition
- Declared they were a medium sized business to obtain higher grant than entitled to
- Declared they were a large business to obtain higher grant than entitled to
- Declared they were a small business but farmed area greater than 30 hectares
- Declared that more than 50% of their agricultural business was on a tenancy but wasn't
- Declared they were island based but weren’t
- Did not declare previous SACGS/CAGS Payment
- Recoverability Safeguard Not Passed (level of outstanding debt to SG)
- Applied for more than their maximum grant eligibility
Businesses that were eligible were then scored against the schemes objectives: business efficiency, business sustainability, environmental protection, greenhouse gas reduction, climate adaptation, as well as public good.
FFIS was a competitive scheme and businesses which met all verification checks and scored highest against scheme objectives were ultimately granted funding.
- Asked by: Jamie Halcro Johnston, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 November 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 1 December 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a breakdown by size of business of the number of (a) ineligible, (b) eligible and successful and (c) eligible and unsuccessful applications to the Future Farming Investment Scheme.
Answer
Figures include the additional 122 offers of grant that will be made following revalidation checks.
| Number of Applications Failing One or More Eligibility/Scheme Requirement Checks Small (<30ha) | Number of Applications Failing One or More Eligibility/Scheme Requirement Checks Medium (>30ha/<150ha) | Number of Applications Failing One or More Eligibility/Scheme Requirement Checks Large (>150ha) |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| NumberSuccessfulSmall (<30ha) | NumberSuccessfulMedium (>30ha/<150ha) | NumberSuccessfulLarge (>150ha) |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Number Eligible Small (<30ha) | Number EligibleMedium (>30ha/ <150ha) | Number Eligible Large (>150ha) |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
- Asked by: Jamie Halcro Johnston, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 November 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 1 December 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a list of all the applications that have been received for the Future Farming Investment Scheme to date, broken down by those that were (a) ineligible, (b) eligible and successful and (c) eligible and unsuccessful.
Answer
Figures include the additional 122 offers of grant that will be made following validation checks.
Number of Applications Received | Number of Applications Failing One or More Eligibility/Scheme Requirement Checks | Number of Applications Passing All Eligibility/Scheme Requirement Checks | Number of Applications Offered a Grant |
| | | |
- Asked by: Jamie Halcro Johnston, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 26 November 2025
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 4 December 2025
To ask the Scottish Government when the Cabinet Secretary for Transport last met with local communities over the future of the Corran Narrows crossing.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 4 December 2025
- Asked by: Jamie Halcro Johnston, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 12 November 2025
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 19 November 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what economic assessment it has undertaken of the potential impact of proposed workers' camps in and around communities across the Highlands and Islands.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 19 November 2025
- Asked by: Jamie Halcro Johnston, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 November 2025
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 12 November 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the potential economic implications of its paper A Fresh Start with Independence.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 12 November 2025
- Asked by: Jamie Halcro Johnston, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 03 November 2025
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 4 November 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how decisions on the award of offers of grants for the Future Farming Investment Scheme were made.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 4 November 2025