- Asked by: Duncan Dunlop, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 October 2026
-
Current Status:
Answer expected on 12 November 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding the 591 young people who were eligible for continuing care but were not receiving it on 31 July 2025, (a) how many declined an offer of continuing care, (b) how many were not offered continuing care, and (c) what reasons were recorded for eligible young people not entering continuing care.
Answer
Answer expected on 12 November 2026
- Asked by: Duncan Dunlop, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 October 2026
-
Current Status:
Answer expected on 12 November 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding the 4,841 young people who were eligible for aftercare services but were not receiving them on 31 July 2025, (a) how many declined the offer of aftercare support, (b) how many had not been offered aftercare support, (c) what reasons were recorded for eligible young people declining the offer of support, and (d) how many were contacted between 1 August 2025 and 31 July 2026 to determine whether they required aftercare support.
Answer
Answer expected on 12 November 2026
- Asked by: Duncan Dunlop, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 October 2026
-
Current Status:
Answer expected on 12 November 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what guidance it provides to local authorities regarding the use of part-time timetables for looked after children.
Answer
Answer expected on 12 November 2026
- Asked by: Duncan Dunlop, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stephen Flynn on 6 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide information regarding the cost of the installation of traffic lights in Springholm on the A75 in Dumfries and Galloway, including from which fund the finance came, what the annual maintenance and running costs are and from which budget that expenditure is made.
Answer
The installation cost of the Reverse Speed Discrimination Traffic Signals on the A75 in Springholm, which includes the upgrade to the detection/activation system was £179,011.18. These were funded from Transport Scotland’s Trunk Road Casualty Reduction budget.
Maintenance of traffic signal equipment is covered as part of the Transport Scotland’s South West Network Management Contract Core Operations budget, which manages several various operations through a monthly payment. As this is a single budget it is not possible to extract costs for individual items.
As the Reverse Speed Discrimination Traffic Signals relate to the trial of an innovative traffic signal operation, maintenance of some specific elements are funded from the Trunk Road Casualty Reduction budget. A fault detection remote monitoring system for the traffic signals is maintained at an annual cost in the order of £15,000. Maintenance works were also carried out on the traffic counter loops in Springholm early in 2026 which provide data for the ongoing monitoring at a cost of £23,698.98.
- Asked by: Duncan Dunlop, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stephen Flynn on 6 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether any evaluation has been made of the installation of traffic lights in Springholm on the A75 in Dumfries and Galloway, the purpose of which is to reduce speeding, including whether there is evidence that this has resulted in a reduced number of accidents and average speed of vehicles.
Answer
A series of speed management measures were introduced in Springholm including the erection of vehicle activated speed limit reminder signs and speed indicator devices. In December 2017, this was further supported by the introduction of a trial of innovative technology comprising two sets of Reverse Speed Discrimination Traffic Signals through the village to manage driver behaviour.
In 2023, an evaluation was undertaken of the effectiveness of these signals by Amey, Transport Scotland’s Operating Company for the South West Unit. This focussed on the impact on vehicle speeds through Springholm using data from permanent traffic loop sites installed prior to the signals being introduced and personal injury collisions.
In the 6-year period prior to the installation of the signals (1 December 2012 to 30 November 2017) there were 3 personal injury collisions recorded. Since the installation of the signals in December 2017 to the date of the evaluation report (November 2023) there were no personal injury collisions recorded.
Monitoring of the average speed of vehicles through the village also indicated that the signals were mostly effective in reducing vehicle speeds, with the exception of one site, which recorded a slight increase in the speed of eastbound vehicles exiting the village.
- Asked by: Duncan Dunlop, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stephen Flynn on 6 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether it or Transport Scotland has issued any guidance to local authorities regarding the installation of traffic lights with the purpose of reducing vehicle speeds, such as the ones in Springholm on the A75 in Dumfries and Galloway.
Answer
Transport Scotland has not issued guidance to local authorities regarding the installation of Reverse Speed Discrimination Traffic Signals, such as the ones in Springholm on the A75 in Dumfries and Galloway. These were introduced as a trial. For Reverse Speed Discrimination Signals to be used as a speed management measure at other locations on the trunk road network or on local authority roads, as they currently are at Springholm, this will require amendment of the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions (TSRGD) 2016 to make these signals enforceable like other traffic signals.
- Asked by: Duncan Dunlop, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 7 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what steps it is taking to ensure that communities hosting multiple onshore wind developments, including Tweedsmuir, receive a fair and lasting share of the benefits arising from those developments.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 7 October 2026
- Asked by: Duncan Dunlop, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 29 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Answer expected on 27 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to strengthen resilience to wildfires, droughts, flooding and other climate changes through nature-based solutions, including peatland restoration, wetland protection, river restoration and native woodland expansion.
Answer
Answer expected on 27 October 2026
- Asked by: Duncan Dunlop, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 23 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 30 September 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what commitment it will give to extending the Borders Railway beyond Tweedbank to Hawick and Carlisle.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 30 September 2026
- Asked by: Duncan Dunlop, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Siobhian Brown on 22 September 2026
To ask the Scottish Government how it measures the effectiveness of online safety resources that it provides to parents and carers, beyond the number of resources produced or distributed.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S7W-03059 on 22 September 2026. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.