- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 28 August 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 24 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether there was any increase in passenger levels on the (a) Aberdeen to Inverness and (b) Perth to Inverness route during the ScotRail peak fares removal pilot compared with passenger levels prior to the pilot being introduced, and, if so, whether it can outline this as a percentage of passengers.
Answer
The following table sets out the comparisons on passenger data for the Aberdeen to Inverness and Glasgow / Edinburgh to Inverness rail services prior and during the peak pilot.
We don’t hold a breakdown of the Perth to Inverness section due to the way the data is collated by route.
Route | Change in demand from Peak Fares |
ABERDEEN-INVERNESS | 4.5% |
GLASGOW/EDINBURGH-INVERNESS | 3.5% |
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus Robertson on 24 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on whether it remains the position of Historic Environment Scotland to oversea the "managed decline" of any of the properties that it manages, and, if so, whether it will provide details of this.
Answer
Historic Environment Scotland will continue to consider all options available to sustain and enhance the sites across its estate as it develops its Properties in Care strategy. However, it is important that we recognise climate change effects have been accelerating, and the increased rainfall and variations in temperature have continuing impacts on both Scotland's natural and built heritage.
I have asked Historic Environment Scotland to write directly to the member to update him of the position.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 24 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-24400 by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 9 January 2024, whether it will provide an update on any recent discussions that it has had with the UK Government on enabling pre-existing marriages to become civil partnerships.
Answer
Following the appointment of Lord Cameron of Lochiel as Parliamentary Under Secretary of State in the Scotland Office, I wrote to him on 17 April 2024 seeking an update on the proposed Order under section 104 of the Scotland Act 1998.
Alister Jack, the then Secretary of State for Scotland, wrote to me on 15 May 2024. In his letter, Mr Jack apologised for the delay. He said he was satisfied that a section 104 Order under the Scotland Act 1998 was the appropriate legislative vehicle, and he was content to provide his in-principle agreement to this Order. He indicated that his officials in the Scotland Office would shortly be setting up a working group of officials to consider the work plan for the Order, including timescales and Parliamentary requirements.
The UK General Election was then called on 23 May and took place on 4 July. Given the change in the UK Government, I wrote to the new Secretary of State, Ian Murray MP, on 12 August 2024 seeking his in-principle agreement to proceed with the section 104 Order. I have not yet received a reply.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 24 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether the planned HMP Highland remains on track to be delivered by 2026.
Answer
Following the award of the construction contract for HMP Highland in April this year, the construction is progressing to plan on site and is scheduled to complete in 2026.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 10 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus Robertson on 24 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether an official from the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) was present at the meeting between the Cabinet Secretary for Constitution, External Affairs and Culture and the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Minister for Defence of Ireland on 6 September 2024, as per the established protocol that ministerial meetings have an FCDO official present.
Answer
In line with agreed practice, an FCDO official was not present at this meeting.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 23 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on the conclusions in the Economist Impact report, The value of action: mitigating the impact of neurological disorders in the United Kingdom.
Answer
The Scottish Government recognises how debilitating and distressing neurological conditions can be and the significant human and economic costs associated. However, we note that this report contains no Scotland-specific analyses of health policy or delivery of care for neurological conditions.
Through the Neurological Care & Support Framework 2020-25, we have awarded £2.6 million supporting innovative projects to achieve better outcomes for people living with neurological conditions. We are working to deliver the aims of improving the provision of co-ordinated health and social care and support, developing sustainable workforce models and ensuring high standards of person-centred care.
We are also working to support people with health conditions, such as neurological conditions, to play an active role within the economy. In 2023-24 we invested £108 million in employability services, providing intensive and personalised pre-employment and in-work support for unemployed disabled people and those with health conditions or other barriers to progressing within work.
Some people with neurological conditions may also be disabled. Our ambition is to at least halve the disability employment gap – the difference between the employment rates for non-disabled people and disabled people aged 16-64 years – by 2038 from 37.4 percentage points in 2016, our baseline year.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 23 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-28961 by Jim Fairlie on 23 August 2024, whether it has any plans to publish an updated report on Scotland’s canal network, in light of it being more than 10 years since the previous report was published.
Answer
The timing of the Making the Most of Scotland’s Canals document reflected the split from the Canals and Waterways Trust in 2012 and Ministers’ desire to set the policy context for a fully devolved Scottish Canals. That context is maintained and refreshed through corporate documents such as the Framework Document and Scottish Canals' Corporate Plan and also through the oversight of the Ministerially appointed Board and Transport Scotland's regular dialogue with Scottish Canals’ CEO and Directors.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 23 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government when it anticipates that the Independent Review of Adult Disability Payment will report back to it.
Answer
The Independent Review of Adult Disability Payment was announced in the 2023 Programme for Government and is currently underway. The review is being chaired by Edel Harris OBE and the final report will be published in July 2025.
The Scottish Government will provide a written response to the review within 6 months of the submission of the final report. The response will comment on each recommendation. The implementation of recommendations will be subject to rigorous assessment of delivery requirements and the affordability of changes. It will also be dependent upon the provision of resources in the relevant Scottish Budget.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 23 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government which NHS boards prescribe dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera) to treat multiple sclerosis (MS); how many patients in each NHS board are receiving this disease modifying therapy, and what its position is on whether it should be prescribed to appropriate patients.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-29676 on 18 September 2024. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 10 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 23 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether it is able to provide a breakdown of the number of patients that faced delayed discharge in NHS Western Isles between January 2024 and August 2024 by age group.
Answer
A delayed discharge occurs when a hospital patient (aged 18 or over) who is clinically ready for discharge from inpatient hospital care continues to occupy a hospital bed beyond the date they are ready for discharge. Public Health Scotland hold data relating to people aged 18 and over affected by delayed discharge.
Data for August 2024 is not yet available as it is due to be published on 1 October 2024. Therefore Table 1 presents the total number of people aged 18 or over who faced a period of delay, for any reason, in NHS Western Isles between 1 January and 31 July 2024.
Table 1: Number of people1 who faced a period of delay in NHS Western Isles hospitals in the period 1 January 2024 to 31 July 2024, by age group.
Age Group2 | Number of individual people who had a delayed discharge episode | No longer in delay at 31 July 20243 | Still in delay at 31 July 20244 |
18+ | 93 | 80 | 13 |
18-74 | 14 | 13 | 1 |
75+ | 79 | 67 | 12 |
1.Some individuals may have had more than one delay episode in this period, however they have only been counted once. Figures include people who experienced a delay at any point in the time period including people whose delay may have started prior to January 2024.
2.The age groups reflect the age groups presented in the monthly delayed discharges publication.
3.Includes people who were: discharged from hospital; have died; or were removed from the delayed discharge list as they were no longer fit for discharge.
4.Delay could have started at any time.
Information on delayed discharges is published monthly on the Public Health Scotland Website. The publication provides a monthly update on the:
- number of people experiencing a delay in discharge from hospital at the monthly census point – the last Thursday of the month.
- number of hospital bed days associated with delayed discharges in the calendar month.
- number of discharges from hospital that followed a period of delay in the calendar month.
In the publication people could be counted in multiple months if they are delayed in more than one month.
Source: Public Health Scotland
Ref: IR2024-0061