- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 6 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the UK Government's call for evidence on the impacts of the rearing, releasing and shooting of gamebirds on wildlife, the environment and animal welfare.
Answer
The Scottish Government is pleased to note the UK Government’s call for evidence on gamebirds. We have a Programme for Government Commitment to consult on phasing out cages for gamebirds and had originally intended to work jointly with the UK Government on this issue via the Kept Animals Bill. Unfortunately due to upheaval in the UK Government at the time, the Bill failed and joint work on a number of welfare issues was not progressed. We therefore issued our own call for evidence in 2024 and are considering our next steps.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 6 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the UK Government's call for evidence on the impacts of the rearing, releasing and shooting of gamebirds on wildlife, the environment and animal welfare, what plans it has to join in with any future consultation on the issue by DEFRA.
Answer
The Scottish Government is pleased to note the UK Government’s call for evidence on gamebirds. We have a Programme for Government Commitment to consult on phasing out cages for gamebirds and will consider carefully any future policy proposals from Defra before deciding whether to consult jointly on the issue.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 23 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 6 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S7W-01986 by Jim Fairlie on 17 August 2026, which stated that the Marine Directorate Licensing Operations Team had concluded its enquiries into the possible pollution incident at Loch Hourn and that findings would be confirmed by the end of August 2026, (a) what is causing the delay in confirming the findings and (b) when the findings will be made available.
Answer
Marine Directorate recognises that this matter has attracted significant interest and that a number of people have been waiting for the outcome of the investigation. It is also acknowledged that the investigation has taken longer than originally anticipated. This was to ensure that all reasonable lines of enquiry were fully considered before a final decision was reached.
Marine Directorate carried out local investigations, including interviewing witnesses and seizing evidence. Witnesses described dead and discoloured prawns and reduced creel catches. One witness reported seeing a large vessel in Loch Hourn, but could not identify it. Marine Directorate undertook aerial surveys, which found no signs of pollution, no visible marine mortality and no costal contamination. AIS, Themis and Telesto vessel tracking analysis was conducted and did not identify any vessels in the area of the suspected pollution incident. A number of vessels were identified operating further away in Loch Hourn and the operators of those vessels were identified. Vessel movement information was provided, operators confirmed that AIS had been active at all times and denied that that any cleaning, disinfection or discharge activity had been undertaken.
In collaboration with SEPA, MRV Sir John Murray visited the location and undertook sampling and camera transect analysis of the seabed at the locations of the affected creel fleets and trawl grounds. The survey found isolated dead sea urchins, but could find no evidence of significant or widespread contamination. Further, there was no evidence of unusual odour, contamination or widespread mortality in the sediment samples.
Having completed those enquiries, the Marine Directorate has concluded that there is insufficient evidence to establish either that an offence was committed under the Marine (Scotland) Act 2010, or to identify any person or organisation responsible. As a result, the investigation has been closed with no further enforcement action possible.
We appreciate that this outcome may be disappointing for those who reported concerns or consider that they were affected by the events observed within Loch Hourn. However, decisions on enforcement action must be based on the available evidence, and the evidential threshold required was not met in this case.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 6 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S7W-02796 by Jim Fairlie on 15 September 2026, what analytical work has commenced since 23 June 2026 to implement Environmental Standards Scotland’s recommendations in Protecting Scotland’s Seafloor, including (a) an assessment of the contribution and sufficiency of the 2025 Programme of Measures, (b) identification of any residual gap against Scotland’s contribution to seafloor integrity targets, (c) consideration of new or additional measures where necessary and (d) development of additional monitoring arrangements and, for each of these workstreams, (i) which directorate or public body is responsible and (ii) when the work is expected to be completed.
Answer
As I have set out in response to previous queries on the matter of Environmental Standards Scotland’s (ESS) report Protecting Scotland’s Seafloor: an assessment of Scottish Ministers’ implementation of the Marine Strategy Regulations 2010, the Scottish Government is carefully considering the findings and recommendations and is engaging closely with ESS to seek to agree an appropriate action plan. The Scottish Government’s position on the report’s findings and recommendations will be set out through that engagement and in its formal response.
As this work is under active development, it would not be appropriate for me to comment further on the details of that work at this stage.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 23 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 6 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to ensure that people with long COVID, myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and other similar conditions in the Highlands can access appropriate specialist support while the new Post-Infection Recovery Service is being established.
Answer
The Scottish Government recognises the significant impact that long COVID, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and similar conditions can have on people’s lives.
The 2025-26 Scottish Budget included an additional £4.5 million to support the development and delivery of specialist support across Scotland for people with long COVID, ME/CFS and other similar conditions. This funding has been confirmed on a recurring basis, providing NHS boards with longer-term certainty to develop services sustainably and support the recruitment and retention of the skilled staff required to deliver them.
Responsibility for the planning and delivery of healthcare services rests with individual NHS boards. We have therefore provided boards with flexibility to develop and deliver models of care that reflect local population needs and circumstances, while following relevant clinical guidance.
While NHS Highland establishes its Post-Infection Recovery Service, patients with long COVID, ME/CFS and similar conditions continue to be able to access assessment, treatment and support through existing NHS services, including primary care and other appropriate local pathways and services based on their individual clinical needs.
The Scottish Government continues to engage with NHS boards on the development of specialist support for people with long COVID, ME/CFS and similar conditions.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 23 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 6 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, further to its answer to question S7W-02315 by Gillian Martin on 24 August 2026, and in light of the Marine Strategy Regulations 2010, which require a programme of measures necessary to achieve or maintain Good Environmental Status, whether it considers that the measures currently in place in Scottish waters are sufficient to achieve Good Environmental Status for seafloor integrity, and, if it has not yet established that they are sufficient, under which provision of the Regulations it considers that implementation of any necessary additional measures may lawfully be deferred.
Answer
The Scottish Government continues to work with the other governments of the UK to implement and review measures intended to support progress towards Good Environmental Status in UK waters.
The findings of the 2026 assessment of Good Environmental Status will inform the next review of the Programme of Measures developed under the Marine Strategy Regulations 2010. The Programme of Measures is kept under periodic review through the cyclical process established under those Regulations.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 23 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 6 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S7W-00018 by Maree Todd on 26 May 2026, what progress has been made by NHS Highland, NHS Orkney, NHS Shetland and NHS Western Isles towards pooling resources and collaborating to provide support for people with long COVID, ME/CFS and other similar conditions, and whether any formal partnership agreement has been established.
Answer
The Scottish Government has provided funding to NHS Highland, NHS Orkney, NHS Shetland and NHS Western Isles to support the development of specialist support for people with long COVID, ME/CFS and other similar conditions.
We have encouraged NHS boards to consider opportunities for collaborative working to ensure appropriate population coverage and make best use of available expertise and resources. Discussions between boards have continued; however, service delivery and partnership arrangements are matters for individual NHS boards.
No formal partnership agreement has been reported to the Scottish Government between NHS Highland, NHS Orkney, NHS Shetland and NHS Western Isles for the delivery of these services. Each board has received its allocation of funding and continues to consider how best to develop support for its population, including through collaborative approaches where appropriate.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 6 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S7W-02781 by Jim Fairlie on 15 September 2026, whether it plans to undertake a Scotland-wide assessment of which areas of the inshore seabed would benefit most from reductions in bottom-towed fishing pressure, when this assessment will commence and when it will be published.
Answer
The Scottish Government has no plans at present to undertake such an assessment. Relevant evidence needs will continue to be considered as part of ongoing work to manage Scotland's seas.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 22 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 6 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what the outcome was of the investigation into the burial of salmon mortalities at the Whiteshore Cockles site on North Uist in May 2024, including what enforcement action, if any, was taken as a result of the investigation.
Answer
Allegations relating to the burial of salmon mortalities at the Whiteshore Cockles Ltd site in North Uist are being investigated by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) .
Whilst the Scottish Government does not hold the information requested, I understand that SEPA may be able to assist and I would encourage the member to contact the agency directly.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 21 September 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 5 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking following the dredging incident in Ardmore Bay on 23 August 2026 and whether (a) the incident is being investigated and, if so, when this will conclude and the findings will be published and (b) it will issue an urgent Marine Conservation Order and/or take other protective measures to prevent further damage.
Answer
The Scottish Government’s Marine Directorate is responsible for the enforcement of fisheries regulations in the Scottish zone. Officers investigated the incident, including analysis of the Remote Electronic Monitoring system (REM) from a vessel identified in the area at the time, no illegal fishing activities were identified and the investigation was closed.
There are no plans introduce an urgent Marine Conservation Order, the area is included in the Scottish Government’s consultation on proposed Fisheries management measures within Scottish inshore Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and proposed Priority Marine Feature (PMF) management areas, which opened recently and runs until 18 January 2027. The Scottish Government encourages interested parties to contribute to this.