Chamber and committees

I refer the member to the answer to question S6T-00019 on 26 May 2021. The answer is available on the Parliament's website at: Official Report - Parliamentary Business : Scottish Parliament

The Scottish Government in terms of its marketing and communication planning, utilises a number of communication channels, to reach those that are hesitant under the generic campaign, Roll Up Our Sleeves, targeting 18-49 year olds.

Under the current Forestry Grant Scheme (2014 - 2024), Scottish Forestry estimate that 160 million trees have been planted.

Of these, 93.6 million were non-native conifers (predominantly Sitka spruce, Douglas fir and other species), and 10.4 million were native conifers (mainly Scots pine). A further 52.5 million were native broadleaves (typically oak, alder, ash, birch, hazel and hawthorn) and 3.5 million were non-native broadleaves (sycamore, beech etc).

The Scottish Government does not offer any tax incentives to support woodland creation through any devolved taxes.

Scottish Forestry issued new guidance Cultivation for Upland Productive Woodland Creation Sites – an Applicant’s Guide on 27 th July. This guidance ensures that forestry practice is based on the latest research evidence from Forest Research on the impact of forestry ground preparation on soils. The research on which it is based is appended to the guidance.

Recorded Police Warnings are an alternative disposal option that are available to police officers that allow them to deal more quickly and efficiently with a range of offences which already commonly result in non-court disposals, including for small quantities of specified controlled drugs. The types of crime covered by the Recorded Police Warning scheme are a matter for the Lord Advocate as part of her independent role as head of the system of prosecution therefore it would not be appropriate for the Scottish Government to comment on this.

Glasgow City Council have Memorandum of Understanding with UK Government related COP26 and to recover costs incurred in relation to the direct spending associated with hosting COP26 in Glasgow. Scottish Minister have made clear their expectation that all costs arising from the decision to hold COP26 in Glasgow will be borne by the UK Government, this includes funding to Glasgow City Council for hosting COP26.

The primary aim of the Scottish Government throughout the pandemic has been to protect people in Scotland against the direct and tragic harm to health which the virus causes, including against long-COVID as we know that the virus affects people’s health in different ways.

Every phase of easing COVID-19 restrictions is considered on a “Four Harms” basis – namely (1) the direct harm caused by the virus; (2) the impact of the virus on broader health and wellbeing; (3) social harms arising from measures necessary to suppress the virus; and (4) damage to the economy. A consideration of the impact of lifting restrictions on the number of people developing long-COVID is at the core of “Harm 1”.

Throughout the pandemic, we have published evidence in support of our decision-making. Impact assessments have been published to accompany regulations since the Strategic Framework was first introduced. They will continue to be a key publication where appropriate whenever regulatory changes are made.

Our initial plan for moving of all of Scotland to Level 0 was delayed in order to allow more people to be fully vaccinated and also to assess the impact of the Delta variant on case numbers and hospital admissions. We have now moved to Level 0 but with an added degree of caution. These decisions have prioritised a careful and gradual approach and taken into account the high prevalence of long-COVID especially amongst young people. This is a concerning trend which we are closely monitoring and, therefore, justifies the cautious easing of restrictions we are pursuing.

Statistics on the waiting times patients experience waiting for family genetic testing following a sudden arrhythmic death syndrome bereavement are not held by Public Health Scotland (PHS). PHS does not hold information on the conditions patients are waiting to be seen for.

Statistics relating to the waits patients experience for new outpatient appointments at specialty level are published up to 31 March 2021. These include waiting times for Clinical Genetics and Cardiology. These can be found at the following link: https://www.publichealthscotland.scot/publications/nhs-waiting-times-stage-of-treatment/nhs-waiting-times-stage-of-treatment-quarter-ending-31-march-2021/ .

For clinical genetics, the median waiting time for patients seen during Jan-Mar ‘21 was 40 days.

The Scottish Government does not hold this information.

While the Scottish Government has overall responsibility for health and social care policy in Scotland, it is for the regional health & social care partnerships to determine the level of services that are required to meet local needs and to arrange an appropriate and suitable range of services to meet these local needs, as mandated under statute in the Public Bodies (Joint Working) (Scotland) Act.

Local Authorities are distinct corporate bodies whose powers are set out in statute and as such are entirely separate from the Scottish Government, however it is the expectation of the Scottish Government that Local Public Bodies will engage with Autistic people and children, including their families where appropriate, in relation to decisions regarding the allocation of funding for autism services.

Scottish Government decisions on national funding in relation to the autism strategy, are taken in consultation with key stakeholders including autistic people through our national strategy leadership arrangements.