- Asked by: Brian Whittle, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 20 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 23 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-42935 by Neil Gray on 20 January 2026, what timeline it has given to the Collaborative Response and Assurance group to consider the recommendations and report back to it.
Answer
The Scottish Government welcomes Audit Scotland’s report and has asked the Collaborative Response and Assurance Group (CRAG), which is co-chaired by the Scottish Government and COSLA, to come together to consider the recommendations as a whole and to develop a partnership approach to addressing them. We remain committed to reforming the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000, which will play a critical role in embedding this recommendation in future.
The Audit Scotland report was discussed at the CRAG meeting held on 12 January with a sub-group due to meet in coming days to review all the recommendations. As such, we are not yet at a point where it is possible to provide specific deadlines or a definitive timeline for when the Group will conclude its consideration of the recommendations and report back. However, the Scottish Government will provide an update to Parliament when the Group is in a position to do so.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of any implications of antibiotic use in salmon farming for antimicrobial resistance and public health.
Answer
Regulation of veterinary medicines is a reserved matter for the UK Government. The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) is responsible for enforcing Veterinary Medicines Regulations and undertaking appropriate monitoring in fulfilment of their regulatory duties.
Antibiotics are only prescribed by veterinarians and must be used responsibly where required for the health and welfare of farmed fish, as legally required under the reserved Veterinary Medicines Regulations 2013.
Scotland participated in the development of the UK’s 20 year vision to contain and control antimicrobial resistance (AMR) by 2040, and is committed to delivering the strategic outcomes of the 2024 – 2029 National Action Plan, through a national implementation plan. This includes a commitment to support operators to protect animal health, including aquaculture, and reduce the need for antibiotics.
The Scottish Government is committed to the “One Health” approach of the 20 year AMR vision, which recognises human health is linked to the health of animals, plants, the environment and food. The VMD monitors levels of antimicrobial resistance in animals which is combined with data regarding levels of antimicrobial resistance detected in humans as part of this One Health approach.
- Asked by: Maggie Chapman, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of reports that Scotland’s salmon industry understated its 2024 antibiotic use by 66% before revising the figure, what sanctions are available where inaccurate or incomplete veterinary-medicines returns required under licence conditions are made to regulators, and what information it has regarding how often any such sanctions have been (a) considered and (b) applied under similar circumstances since 2021.
Answer
Regulation of veterinary medicines is a reserved matter for the UK Government. The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) is responsible for market authorisation of antibiotics, including publication of antibiotic sales and sectorial usage statistics, and surveillance of antimicrobial resistance.
The VMD publishes antibiotic sales and usage figures annually in the Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance Sales and Surveillance (VARSS) Report. Figures for antibiotics sales figures, including aquaculture, are provided by the veterinary pharmaceutical companies marketing these products to the VMD, and this is a statutory requirement. The VARSS report also includes data on usage in different animal sectors, including fish, and the VMD works in partnership with animal sectors to develop, facilitate and coordinate antibiotic usage data collection systems. Data are reported on a voluntary basis.
For the purpose of environmental protection, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) places licence conditions on marine fish farm operators to record and report antibiotic treatments to SEPA, including the product and volume used. The requirement for enforcement action associated with non-compliance in returns is assessed in line with SEPA’s enforcement approach.
No enforcement action has been required by SEPA in respect of any non- or incorrect antibiotic usage reports it has received from operators.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the potential impact on Scotland’s forests of its proposed budget reduction of 40.2% to Forestry and Land Scotland in its draft Budget 2026-27.
Answer
The 40.2% reduction compares the FY 25/26 budget, including Autumn Budget Revision (ABR) transfers with the FY 26/27 budget.
During the FY 2025-26, Forestry and Land Scotland received a £7.0m transfer for Peatland and Atlantic Rainforest restoration on Scotland’s national forests and land as part of the ABR. Allocation of funding for those activities in FY 2026-27 to delivery partners (including FLS) has yet to agreed.
If this transfer is removed to enable a like-for-like comparison, the reduction is 22% (£5.0m), which relates to funding for woodland creation on Scotland’s national forests and land.
There is a corresponding increase in the capital allocation to Scottish Forestry. The Scottish Government is placing a greater emphasis on supporting woodland creation through the Forestry Grant Scheme (FGS).
Focusing woodland creation through the FGS offers improved value for money for the taxpayer, as the FGS only partially covers the cost of tree planting, requiring private investment to meet remaining costs and to purchase the land.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 23 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government how much has been provided to local authorities to address delayed discharges, broken down by local authority, in each of the last five years.
Answer
The 2026-27 Budget provides a further real terms increase in the Local Government Settlement, delivering record funding of almost £15.7 billion including, a quarter of a billion pounds of unrestricted General Revenue Grant.
However, the Scottish Government’s policy towards local authorities’ spending is to allow local authorities the financial freedom to operate independently. As such, the vast majority of funding is provided by means of a block grant. It is then the responsibility of individual local authorities to manage their own budgets and to allocate the total financial resources available to them, including on delayed discharges, on the basis of local needs and priorities, having first fulfilled their statutory obligations and the jointly agreed set of national and local priorities.
- Asked by: Maggie Chapman, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 23 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason the successful application rate for Adult Disability Payment (ADP) has reportedly fallen in each fiscal year that ADP has operated, from 57% in 2022-23, to 51% in 2023-24, to 42% in 2024-25, and to 34% in 2025-26 to date.
Answer
Social Security Scotland is committed to ensuring eligible people receive the financial help they are entitled to.
Independent analysis by the Institute of Fiscal Studies and the Resolution Foundation shows a surge in application numbers following Adult Disability Payment’s introduction, driven by awareness-raising activity and more accessible application processes, along with an initial higher rate in awarded applications. This was followed by a stabilisation in awarded applications as processes mature and decision-making becomes more consistent.
Social Security Scotland remains committed to making the right decision first time and continues to monitor performance to ensure accurate decision-making across all benefits.
- Asked by: Claire Baker, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 23 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government how many staff have been transferred from its Social Security Directorate to Social Security Scotland, and for what purpose, in each year since 2018.
Answer
Transfer of staff from the Social Security Directorate to Social Security Scotland has not been a routine feature of delivering the Social Security Programme.
Since 2018, a total of 17 staff have formally transferred from the Directorate to Social Security Scotland. These transfers took place to support the safe transition of new benefits and services from programme development into operational delivery rather than into existing job roles.
For wider context, as part of Programme closure, we are forecasting that 187 staff will transfer on 27 March 2026 from the Directorate to the Digital, Delivery and Change Division within Social Security Scotland to provide ongoing support to the live running, maintenance, and continuous improvement of our digital ecosystem and benefit products.
2018-2027 Staff transfers from the Social Security Directorate to Social Security Scotland
| | 2018-19 | 2019-20 | 2020-21 | 2021-22 | 2022-23 | 2023-24 | 2024-25 | 2025-26 | 2026-27 forecast |
Staff transfers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 187 forecast |
Total inc. forecast figures | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 17 | 204 |
- Asked by: Brian Whittle, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 13 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 23 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the Audit Scotland report, Delayed discharges: A symptom of the challenges facing health and social care, which was published on 8 January 2026, what governance arrangements are in place with the population health framework, the health and social care service renewal framework and the NHS operational improvement plan to promote shared accountability and joint decision-making between it, local authorities, NHS boards, health and social care partnerships and integrated joint boards.
Answer
We have now finalised plans for Health and Social Care Reform Portfolio and programme governance to take forward the commitments within the Operational Improvement Plan (OIP), the Population Health Framework (PHF) and the Service Renewal Framework (SRF), and it is through these frameworks that we will deliver the vision of a Scotland where people live longer, healthier and more fulfilling lives.
The Reform Oversight Board brings together national and local accountability for delivery of the aims and priorities of the PHF and SRF. The Board complements, not replaces, local and national reform governance. It is jointly accountable to Scottish Ministers and COSLA Leaders. The first meeting of this quarterly board took place on 12 November, and it is chaired by the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Social Care and the COSLA spokesperson for Health and Social Care.
Additionally, Programme Boards have been established for the PHF (first meeting 26 November) and the SRF (first meeting 2 December) to set strategic direction and provide oversight. Board membership includes representatives from COSLA, SOLACE, NHS Boards and Integration Joint Boards.
The Collaborative Response and Assurance Group, which is co-chaired by the Scottish Government and COSLA have been asked to come together to consider the Audit Scotland report's recommendations as a whole and develop a partnership approach to addressing them. Local systems are working to reduce delays and deliver on the commitments set out in the OIP.
- Asked by: Brian Whittle, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 13 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 23 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the recommendation in the Audit Scotland report, Delayed discharges: A symptom of the challenges facing health and social care, which was published on 8 January 2026, that "the Scottish Government, NHS Scotland, the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (COSLA), Healthcare Improvement Scotland, integration authorities and their partner NHS boards and councils, should...in the next six months, publish guidance to clarify and strengthen the role of integration joint boards and health and social care partnerships in the governance and delivery of the health and social care service renewal framework".
Answer
We agree with Audit Scotland that Integration Joint Boards (IJBs) and Health and Social Care Partnerships (HSCPs) are critical in delivering our reform ambitions as set out in the Service Renewal Framework (SRF), published in June 2025. Governance arrangements for the SRF have now been established, with IJBs, local authorities and Health Boards all represented and operating as key partners in design and delivery. The SRF signals a determination to build on the successes that we have already seen and to provide clarity on how we empower our system leaders to work with people to deliver change.
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 13 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 23 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government how much funding it has allocated to the Low Emission Zone Support Fund for Households since its introduction; what proportion of that has been allocated to be used for eligible households within the relevant area in Aberdeen, and how much of that allocation has been distributed to eligible households.
Answer
The Low Emission Zone (LEZ) Support Fund has allocated £15,414,650 to households and businesses within 20km of any LEZ in Scotland since 2020. To date £9,136,003.87 has been paid out to households in Scotland.
There was no set allocation per city, to households or to businesses. This allowed flexibility to respond to demand dependant on applications received each year.
I can advise that £551,427.13 of this funding has been awarded to households within 20km of the Aberdeen LEZ.