Official Report 371KB pdf
Item 3 is consideration of responses received from cross-party group conveners. At the meeting on 23 May, members will recall that we agreed to write to the cross-party groups on beer and the brewing industry, co-operatives, park homes and sexual health because it had been identified that they had not met for more than a year.
The update on cross-party groups has proven to be a worthwhile exercise. The paper is helpful. I am particularly pleased to note that one of the groups has offered to lapse its membership. That demonstrates how things sometimes move on and issues change.
I agree that that is encouraging. We should perhaps simply note the fact the co-operatives and park homes groups have held their annual general meetings and that they are back on track, and that the sexual health group is to lapse.
I agree. I do not think that there is a case for groups to sit in abeyance, so the group should lapse. Under the new procedures, it will have to come back and present a case if it wants to be re-established.
Do members agree with that?
Previous
Post-legislative Scrutiny Inquiry