Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…
Chamber and committees

Audit Committee, 20 Jan 2004

Meeting date: Tuesday, January 20, 2004


Contents


Items in Private

The Convener (Mr Brian Monteith):

I open the second meeting in 2004 of the Audit Committee and I make the usual announcement about mobile phones and pagers—I am pretty certain that my phone is switched off. I welcome members of the public, the press and others to the meeting, although the first public part of the meeting will be rather brief. We have received apologies from Susan Deacon, who is in Campbeltown with the Enterprise and Culture Committee, and from Kenny MacAskill, who has to leave before the end of the meeting. Marlyn Glen is with us as a committee substitute for Susan Deacon, and we are pleased to welcome her along. When we are back in public session, before item 3, we will take her declaration of interests. We are pleased to welcome the Auditor General for Scotland and his team.

We have a busy agenda today. Item 1 is to consider whether to take items 2, 5, 6 and 7 in private. I seek the committee's agreement to do so. Item 2 is our consideration of lines of questioning of the witnesses for the report that we are preparing on Scottish Enterprise and item 5 is the committee's consideration of the evidence taken in that session. Item 6 is consideration of the draft report on our inquiry into the Auditor General for Scotland's report on supporting prescribing in general practice. Item 7 is consideration of our approach to the Auditor General's report on the national health service in Scotland.

Are we agreed that we should take agenda items 2, 5, 6 and 7 in private?

Members indicated agreement.

The Convener:

Under item 1, we must also consider our approach to lines of questioning for the Parliament's accountable officer. I seek the committee's agreement that before Paul Grice appears before the committee—the date for that is still to be decided—we should consider our lines of questioning in advance in private session, so that we can determine what questions can most usefully be put. Do members agree that we should do so?

Members indicated agreement.

Before we move on, I can inform the committee that we have had a brief discussion with Paul Grice, and we will probably have him before us for evidence at the meeting on 2 March. We will confirm that soon.

Meeting continued in private.

Meeting continued in public.