As members will see, the convener's report contains a recommendation to encourage members who can attend the EMILE working group to do so. However, the clerks advise me that the meeting has been postponed and that no date has been set for a future meeting. The reason for postponement is that very few committee members could attend. We said from the outset that it would be difficult to meet the date, which had been changed from 19 September. I am pleased that the minister has accepted our suggestion that the meeting should be postponed and we will inform members of the new date when we receive it.
At what time is the meeting?
I do not know. We have not yet finalised the programme, but I think that it will happen some time in the morning. Am I correct?
We are hoping that the meeting will take place around 10 o'clock in the morning and that it will last perhaps until midday. It would be nice if the visiting representatives were able to observe some parliamentary proceedings such as question time and First Minister's question time. My colleague Nick Hawthorne is putting together a draft programme, which we hope to send to members in the next day or so and which will give the timings of various activities.
Colleagues will agree that this is an interesting development in the committee's work. I certainly look forward to welcoming to Scotland representatives from Catalonia and Flanders.
Hallelujah! We have an adviser. Do we get a prize?
Members are obviously pleased about that. I look forward to seeing Jon Jordan at the next meeting. We can task the clerk with working with the adviser and to begin activities on the inquiry.
Previous
Scottish Executive (Scrutiny)Next
Sift