Official Report 145KB pdf
Civil Legal Aid (Scotland) Amendment<br />(No 2) Regulations 2006 (SSI 2006/325)
Agenda item 3 is Executive responses. As members will recall, we raised two points on these regulations. First, to our question of why section 36(3)(bb) of the Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 1986 had not been cited as an enabling power or its relevance indicated in a footnote, the Executive has said that it was not cited because it was not, in itself, an enabling power. However, it has acknowledged an oversight with regard to the footnote. I take it that members agree to draw the response to the attention of the lead committee and Parliament on the ground of failure to follow proper legislative practice.
Secondly, we asked the Executive about the purpose of regulation 1(2), which contains definitions of terms that are not used in the regulations. The Executive accepts that regulation 1(2) is superfluous. Do members agree to pass its response to the lead committee and the Parliament on the ground of defective drafting?
Firefighters' Pension Scheme Amendment (Scotland) Order 2006 (SSI 2006/342)
We asked the Executive three questions on this order. First, on the reference to "Firefighters' Compensation Scheme", the Executive has acknowledged defective drafting.
Adults with Incapacity (Removal of Regenerative Tissue for Transplantation) (Form of Certificate) (Scotland) Regulations 2006 (SSI 2006/343)
With regard to these regulations, we asked the Executive, first, about the absence of a starting date for the certificate and, secondly, about the power to revoke the certificate. The Executive says that it intends to revoke and replace the regulations to take into account the points that we have raised.
We should report the regulations to the lead committee in those terms.
I think so, too. We should also make it clear that we welcome the plans to replace the regulations.
Avian Influenza and Influenza of Avian Origin in Mammals (Scotland) Order 2006 (SSI 2006/336)
We raised six points on the order and members have seen the Executive's response. Our legal advisers discussed a number of points with the Executive at an early stage, which enabled the Executive to amend the order before it was sent for printing and thereby avoid the need for an amending instrument. However, that should not detract from the fact that the order, which as we know has important consequences for those affected by it, contained—like previous instruments—many drafting errors. Members commented on those last week.
Do we not?
I do not think that we do.
So we have a timetable for amending the order.
Many of the errors were corrected at printing.