Item 3 concerns a letter from the convener of the Subordinate Legislation Committee, which draws to our attention an issue that that committee thinks is a matter of some concern with regard to our relations with Westminster. The letter asks whether we considered this matter when inquiring into the Sewel convention. The answer is that we did not—that is a factual answer.
I do not disagree with that. We did not touch on this subject when we considered Sewel motions: we merely considered the generality and noted that there is a power for the Westminster Parliament to amend acts of the Scottish Parliament if it so wishes. I agree that the Subordinate Legislation Committee should be encouraged to investigate the matter. We will await with bated breath the outcome of its investigation.
Is that agreed?