This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
I invite committee members to ask questions based on the written evidence. This question follows up a point in the submission from the Scottish Crofting Foundation.
Do you have initiatives where, for example, young people follow a councillor for a week or find out about day-to-day council work and what goes on in committees?
You highlighted the fact that last year was not a typical year because it followed major structural change in the service and contained year 2000 risks.
That is my position on discussing the draft report in private. Following Ben Wallace's comments on our previous report, I have had discussions with the clerks.
That is my position on discussing the draft report in private. Following Ben Wallace's comments on our previous report, I have had discussions with the clerks.
We got it only at the weekend ourselves. COSLA describes the process as follows:"Since the opening of the Parliament in July 1999 COSLA has been in almost constant contact with the Parliament, its Committees, MSPs and staff.
For admissible but unchosen amendments, would it be possible to add, at the end of the marshalled list, "The following amendments were not chosen", with their numbers?
That would allow people to see how their views have been taken into consideration. I want to follow up Elaine Murray's point about the obligation to "have regard to" the national park plan.