This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
That has not been done before and the lack of such information has bedevilled the political arguments. I would like to follow up on that point, and to put on a more parochial hat for a moment.
The directive undoubtedly provides for the twilight issue and requires all regimes to follow a 24-hour rhythm, including a period of darkness for a third of the day.
There are others from whom we should take evidence, such as academics who have a specific interest in local government finance. I envisage that we will follow the same sort of system as we followed when we considered the McIntosh report.
When we come to public accountability, we should follow the example of other organisations and circulate a questionnaire, for instance, to everyone who has given evidence at the committee.
Finally, as always, the doctor is bound to follow his professional judgment, act in accordance with his professional ethics and comply with the general law.
Given the First Minister's personal commitment to the abolition of child poverty by 2020, how does he believe the Labour Party's commitment to extending free school meals fits into that ambition?
Are we agreed that we should draw the attention of the Parliament and the lead committee to the order on the ground of failure to follow proper legislative practice, and that we should include the explanation that has been given?
We might ask why the Scottish bill does not contain that duty, although I am not saying that we should necessarily follow what is happening in England and Wales.