search

Official Report Meeting date: 3 May 2006

It is great to get that clear.I have a follow-up question for Duncan Mulholland.

Official Report Meeting date: 28 March 2006

I am sure that that will be rectified following this meeting.There is a helpful comment on dispensations in paragraph 16.

Official Report Meeting date: 8 February 2006

That means if the reporter's recommendation does not make sense and does not follow from the case that has been put to him or her.

Official Report Meeting date: 8 September 2005

The minister"cannot see the case for following an English model which has caused those difficulties."

Official Report Meeting date: 12 January 2005

The person who drafted the bill followed section 15 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which applies in England and Wales.

Official Report Meeting date: 23 March 2004

COSLA guidelines state that the d'Hondt principle should be followed, but those guidelines are not statutory and do not appear in regulations.

Official Report Meeting date: 25 February 2004

That is because of pre-emption. Of course, members will have followed all that very closely; we will deal with matters as they arise.

Official Report Meeting date: 25 February 2003

Have you ever tried to get them to make such an order? We must follow certain legal guidelines first.

Official Report Meeting date: 18 December 2002

Procedural regulations under section 30 will set out the procedure that is to be followed in connection with applications.

Official Report Meeting date: 19 June 2002

So there is a precedent and I hope that the Executive will follow that example. I certainly hope so.

Search