There are 118,635 results relating to "Followed 2020 auf anfrage"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
13 September 2000
Health and Community Care Committee, 13 Sep 2000
That responsibility has disappeared, following social services' focus on the provision of personal care.
Official Report
Meeting date:
26 April 2000
Health and Community Care Committee, 26 Apr 2000
There is a register of all patients and a very thorough follow-up. That is not universally the case; in fact, the reverse may be the case in many places.
Official Report
Meeting date:
12 January 2000
Social Inclusion, Housing and Voluntary Sector Committee, 12 Jan 2000
As Mike Isaac and I said earlier, in a number of cases, we get to the end of the line and judge that there is no point in following the procedure. We follow it through only when we think there is benefit in doing so.
Official Report
Meeting date:
9 November 1999
Justice and Home Affairs Committee, 09 Nov 1999
Are there other questions? I am trying to follow this, but it is a bit esoteric for me.
Official Report
Meeting date:
3 November 1999
Justice and Home Affairs Committee, 03 Nov 1999
We need clarification, as we are all operating on the basis of newspaper reports that gave us nothing more than a figure, followed by a great deal of speculation.
Official Report
Meeting date:
6 February 2007
Justice 2 Committee, 06 Feb 2007
This is day 1 of our stage 2 consideration of the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill. Following the committee's decision, we will consider the bill in the following order today: sections 43 to 46, on weapons; section 1; schedule 1; and sections 2 to 5.
Official Report
Meeting date:
5 December 2006
Subordinate Legislation Committee, 05 Dec 2006
The proportion might be higher but there still might be only three people. I really do not follow the economic argument that there is a difference between the two cases.
Official Report
Meeting date:
3 May 2005
Baird Trust Reorganisation Bill Committee, 03 May 2005
We have studied the McFadden report and have been following the progress of the bill with interest.
Official Report
Meeting date:
27 March 2002
Standards Committee, 27 Mar 2002
There should not be a bar on a cross-party group taking that approach if it so wished.Perhaps we could have a trial period of six months or a year, to be followed by a review. Ken Macintosh made some relevant points.
Official Report
Meeting date:
15 January 2002
Subordinate Legislation Committee, 15 Jan 2002
We have thought about and are alive to it"— But, "and we are ignoring you." No—"and we think that, for the following reasons, technically we are okay."
