This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
In fact, the document goes further than that.The minister may recall that my colleague, Fergus Ewing, wrote to her on 7 April about one of the voluntary organisations in his constituency, which believes that it may be about to be sued.
Susan Duffy is comfortable that she can express Wendy Alexander's points. Others may have other points, but the two that I mentioned seem to be the big ones.
We think that the bill strikes a fair balance between interference with rights and the public benefit, but the issue may be more complicated because of areas in which more may need to be done or where the balance is finer.
How can we make that decision unless we have heard from the mover of amendment 36 their opinion of amendment 36B? They may or may not wish to accept amendment 36B.
We know that it must be passed and we all recognise that it may lead to considerable benefits, but how are rural businesses going to pay such a huge price tag?