There are 104,441 results relating to "Followed 2020 auf anurag"
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
29 January 2002
Local Government Committee, 29 Jan 2002
If you have a complaint about the Scottish Executive giving us far too much business—and I might agree with that on occasion—we can take that up elsewhere.I suggest that we agree to Sylvia Jackson's compromise suggestion that the committee defers consideration of the stage 1 report on the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill to the meeting on 5 February 2002 and follows the agenda as published with regard to the stage 1 report on the Public Appointments (Parliamentary Approval) (Scotland) Bill.
Official Report
Meeting date:
29 January 2002
Finance Committee, 29 Jan 2002
I do not refer to our discussions with the minister, but rather to what followed. We cannot amend the bill. Technically, if we ever had the stage 2 report and stage 1 of the bill at the same time, we would have to leave open the possibility that, as a result of that process, the minister would want to amend the bill.
Official Report
Meeting date:
2 October 2001
Rural Development Committee, 02 Oct 2001
If we feel the need to return to the petition following discussion with the officials, I suggest that we do so.
Official Report
Meeting date:
25 September 2001
Justice 1 Committee, 25 Sep 2001
First, the regulations provide part of the legislative framework that we must put in place for the drug court pilot, which is to start in Glasgow sheriff court on 15 October. They follow the recommendations of the working group that was chaired by the sheriff principal and that involved the Glasgow Bar Association among other organisations.
Official Report
Meeting date:
18 September 2001
Audit Committee, 18 Sep 2001
We have a pretty robust and comprehensive statement about how the health department and the health board are proceeding following the publication of our report.
Official Report
Meeting date:
12 June 2001
Finance Committee, 12 Jun 2001
Thank you.As Alasdair Morgan said, David Davidson raised the major points at our previous meeting and I invite him to follow up those points in the light of Alasdair Morgan's comments.
Official Report
Meeting date:
25 January 2001
Plenary, 25 Jan 2001
Can you rule as to whether, on a future occasion, if any party wishes to make a statement following a debate, you will allow that statement to be made and that that gesture will not be made simply towards the Executive?
Official Report
Meeting date:
26 September 2000
Equal Opportunities Committee, 26 Sep 2000
Two main issues were on the agenda. Following the evidence that the DPHS gave us some time ago, we raised issues with three ministers, and have now received responses.
Official Report
Meeting date:
27 June 2000
Justice and Home Affairs Committee, 27 Jun 2000
Executive amendments 27, 37, 38, 39 and 42 follow from the further consideration that has been given to the appropriate removal provisions for full justices.
Official Report
Meeting date:
27 June 2000
Subordinate Legislation Committee, 27 Jun 2000
One point that the Executive makes is that all legislation has to be ECHR-compliant, but it is entirely appropriate for the lead committee to pursue the Executive and seek assurance that section 64 does comply with the ECHR. To follow on from what Fergus said, it would seem to be good practice to use this method of looking at legislation, rather than doing ...
