Skip to main content
Loading…

Search

There are 99,272 results relating to "employee assistance programme"

Order by |

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Official Report Meeting date: 27 March 2002

Plenary, 27 Mar 2002

It has been funded with help from the LEADER programme, but I understand that no future funding is available.
Official Report Meeting date: 5 November 2001

European Committee, 05 Nov 2001

We will consider how other states access the EU and we have someone to assist us with that work. At the end of the day, concordats are not legally binding.
Official Report Meeting date: 5 November 2001

European Committee, 05 Nov 2001

We will consider how other states access the EU and we have someone to assist us with that work. At the end of the day, concordats are not legally binding.
Official Report Meeting date: 16 November 2006

Plenary, 16 Nov 2006

However, I believe that we need to start to review the bill within five years, and certainly within a decade, of royal assent. Perhaps the trick is to have a programme from the Executive that is similar to the programme that was built up for the bill's introduction.
Official Report Meeting date: 16 March 2005

Justice 1 Committee, 16 Mar 2005

Judges do not have to start with a clean sheet; background information and case law will assist them in reaching their decisions.
Official Report Meeting date: 26 February 2003

Plenary, 26 Feb 2003

We should consider the analogy of classroom assistants, who have helped greatly in our schools.
Official Report Meeting date: 2 October 2001

Audit Committee, 02 Oct 2001

I agreed to fund a consultant to assist the college to develop a robust recovery plan.Dr Logan inherited that work.
Questions and Answers Date answered: 29 June 2000

S1W-07994

The criteria are based on the classic criteria first promulgated in a WHO Report in 1996, and also take into account international work on the appraisal of screening programmes, particularly that in Canada and the United States.1. The condition1.1 The condition should be an important health problem.1.2 The epidemiology and natural history of the condition, including development from latent to declared disease, should be adequately understood and there should be a detectable risk factor, disease marker, latent period or early symptomatic stage.1.3 All the cost-effective primary prevention interventions should have been implemented as far as practicable.2. The test2.1 There should be a simple, safe, precise and validated screening test.2.2 The distribution of test values in the target population should be known and a suitable cut-off level defined and agreed.2.3 The test should be acceptable to the population.2.4 There should be an agreed policy on the further diagnostic investigation of individuals with a positive test result and on the choices available to those individuals.3. The treatment3.1 There should be an effective treatment or intervention for patients identified through early detection, with evidence of early treatment leading to better outcomes than late treatment.3.2 There should be agreed evidence-based policies covering which individuals should be offered treatment and the appropriate treatment to be offered.3.3 Clinical management of the condition and patient outcomes should be optimised by all health care providers prior to participation in a screening programme.4. The screening programme4.1 There should be evidence from high quality Randomised Controlled Trials that the screening programme is effective in reducing mortality or morbidity.4.2 There should be evidence that the complete screening programme (test, diagnostic procedures, treatment/intervention) is clinically, socially and ethically acceptable to health professionals and the public.4.3 The benefit from the screening programme should outweigh the physical and psychological harm (caused by the test, diagnostic procedures and treatment).4.4 The opportunity cost of the screening programme (including testing, diagnosis and treatment) should be economically balanced in relation to expenditure on medical care as a whole.4.5 There should be a plan for managing and monitoring the screening programme and an agreed set of quality assurance standards.4.6 Adequate staffing and facilities for testing, diagnosis, treatment and programme management should be available prior to the commencement of the screening programme.4.7 All other options for managing the condition should have been considered (e.g. improving treatment, providing other services).
Questions and Answers Date answered: 8 September 2004

S2W-10101

To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body how many MSPs' staff volunteered to assist with the live testing of facilities at Holyrood.
Questions and Answers Date answered: 25 January 2001

S1W-12419

To ask the Scottish Executive when it will publish the criteria according to which entitlement to assistance under its central heating initiative will be determined.

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].