Skip to main content
Loading…

Search

There are 89,299 results relating to "Getting the Inactive Active"

Order by |

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Official Report Meeting date: 9 September 1999

Plenary, 09 Sep 1999

That amendment would allow the committee to get down to work and report prior to stage 1.
Questions and Answers Date answered: 5 February 2007

S2W-31373

Therefore any changes overtime may not be significant.Table 2 Percentage Change inEmployee Jobs in the Forestry, Logging and Related Service Activities Industry byParliamentary Constituency, 2001-05 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Aberdeen Central * * * * Aberdeen North * ...
Questions and Answers Date answered: 10 September 2004

S2W-08840

The information requested is shown in the following tables:Children and Adults Treated in the Community Dental Service (CDS); by Health Board; Year Ending 31 March   2003R Children Adults No. of patients treated in CDS % of child population treated in CDS No. of patients treated in the CDS % of adult population treated in CDS Scotland 88,006 8.1% 34,675 0.9% Argyll and Clyde 5,016 5.5% 2,588 0.8% Ayrshire and Arran 7,449 9.3% 3,145 1.1% Borders 2,656 11.7% 1,223 1.4% Dumfries and Galloway 2,021 6.5% 1,510 1.3% Fife 9,043 11.8% 3,567 1.3% Forth Valley 2,775 4.5% 2,315 1.1% Grampian 8,114 7.3% 3,160 0.8% Greater Glasgow 15,160 8.2% 4,496 0.7% Highland 5,871 12.9% 1,491 0.9% Lanarkshire 12,676 10.1% 1,513 0.4% Lothian 7,449 4.6% 5,293 0.9% Orkney 1,285 30.0% 508 3.4% Shetland 2,315 43.5% 106 0.6% Tayside 3,385 4.2% 3,423 1.1% Western Isles 2,791 50.2% 337 1.6%     2002R Children Adults No. of patients treated in CDS % of child population treated in CDS No. of patients treated in the CDS % of adult population treated in CDS Scotland 93,312 8.6% 34,766 0.9% Argyll and Clyde 5,157 5.7% 1,952 0.6% Ayrshire and Arran 6,804 8.5% 3,509 1.2% Borders 3,231 14.2% 1,136 1.3% Dumfries and Galloway 2,401 7.7% 1,240 1.1% Fife 8,871 11.5% 3,244 1.2% Forth Valley 2,838 4.6% 1,950 0.9% Grampian 9,514 8.5% 4,575 1.1% Greater Glasgow 15,891 8.6% 4,907 0.7% Highland 6,604 14.5% 1,379 0.8% Lanarkshire 12,958 10.3% 1,315 0.3% Lothian 8,166 5.1% 5,622 0.9% Orkney 1,755 40.9% 589 3.9% Shetland 2,543 47.8% 92 0.6% Tayside 3,306 4.1% 3,027 1.0% Western Isles 3,273 58.8% 229 1.1%     2001R Children Adults No. of patients treated in CDS % of child population treated in CDS No. of patients treated in the CDS % of adult population treated in CDS Scotland 104,881 9.7% 36,951 0.9% Argyll and Clyde 5,303 5.8% 1,716 0.5% Ayrshire and Arran 7,521 9.4% 3,600 1.3% Borders 3,271 14.4% 1,014 1.2% Dumfries and Galloway 3,467 11.2% 1,441 1.2% Fife 9,400 12.2% 2,828 1.0% Forth Valley 3,602 5.8% 1,992 0.9% Grampian 11,560 10.4% 7,302 1.8% Greater Glasgow 15,123 8.2% 4,135 0.6% Highland 7,874 17.3% 1,229 0.8% Lanarkshire 15,095 12.0% 2,075 0.5% Lothian 9,350 5.8% 6,071 1.0% Orkney 2,105 49.1% 424 2.8% Shetland 3,676 69.1% 93 0.6% Tayside 3,514 4.4% 2,891 0.9% Western Isles 4,020 72.3% 140 0.7%     2000R Children Adults No. of patients treated in CDS % of child population treated in CDS No. of patients treated in the CDS % of adult population treated in CDS Scotland 118,957 11.0% 40,028 1.0% Argyll and Clyde 5,836 6.4% 1,769 0.5% Ayrshire and Arran 7,286 9.1% 2,808 1.0% Borders 3,625 16.0% 1,136 1.3% Dumfries and Galloway 4,844 15.6% 1,568 1.3% Fife 10,856 14.1% 2,615 1.0% Forth Valley 4,851 7.9% 2,274 1.0% Grampian 13,215 11.9% 8,841 2.1% Greater Glasgow 16,396 8.9% 4,495 0.7% Highland 8,576 18.8% 1,186 0.7% Lanarkshire 18,589 14.8% 1,996 0.5% Lothian 10,400 6.5% 7,646 1.2% Orkney 2,094 48.8% 519 3.5% Shetland 4,031 75.8% 100 0.6% Tayside 4,213 5.2% 2,931 1.0% Western Isles 4,145 74.5% 144 0.7%     1999R Children Adults No. of patients treated in CDS % of child population treated in CDS No. of patients treated in the CDS % of adult population treated in CDS Scotland 123,567 11.4% 40,211 1.0% Argyll and Clyde 5,882 6.5% 1,929 0.6% Ayrshire and Arran 7,837 9.8% 3,100 1.1% Borders 4,189 18.5% 900 1.1% Dumfries and Galloway 3,498 11.3% 1,272 1.1% Fife 11,741 15.3% 2,300 0.8% Forth Valley 5,811 9.4% 2,131 1.0% Grampian 13,730 12.3% 9,553 2.3% Greater Glasgow 16,913 9.2% 3,829 0.6% Highland 8,865 19.4% 1,169 0.7% Lanarkshire 18,886 15.1% 1,924 0.5% Lothian 11,648 7.3% 8,499 1.4% Orkney 2,724 63.5% 666 4.5% Shetland 3,805 71.5% 128 0.8% Tayside 5,673 7.0% 2,749 0.9% Western Isles 2,365 42.5% 62 0.3% Sources: SMR13 (Community Dental Service patient treatment record); GRO(S) (mid-year 2002 population data).Note: RRevised.These figures do not take account of other activities...
Questions and Answers Date answered: 28 January 2003

S1W-33408

This will expand on previously planned activity, and will cover a three-year period.
Questions and Answers Date answered: 25 October 2000

S1W-10588

The funds will be allocated to local authorities on the basis of readiness for expenditure on activities detailed in Area Waste Plans.
Official Report Meeting date: 24 April 2002

Plenary, 24 Apr 2002

I ask members to keep their remarks very tight indeed so that we can get through all those who want to contribute.
Questions and Answers Date answered: 10 September 2003

S2W-02419

In the absence of Scottishprovisions, couples will have to travel down south to get some of the rights oftheir counterparts in England and Wales.
Questions and Answers Date answered: 5 December 2002

S1W-32278

I very much endorse these conclusions. Getting the balance and approach right for current and future generations of parents is not something that can be achieved on the basis of a limited investigation.Some of the report's findings relate to good practice.
Official Report Meeting date: 23 January 2002

Transport and the Environment Committee, 23 Jan 2002

I find that I am having to lodge probing amendments to get answers to questions about the bill.
Official Report Meeting date: 31 January 2002

Plenary, 31 Jan 2002

However, there is a danger that the message that goes out to the general public is that only the intervention of MSPs gets results. That is nice for an MSP who has managed to get a result for somebody, but it suggests something about the attitude that is taken towards the public when they seek to complain on their own behalf.It is essential that public services should strive to get things right at the beginning, so that people do not want to complain.

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].