There are 102,492 results relating to "Cele mai ieftine Olanzapin"
Order by
|
Committee reports
Date published:
9 December 2020
Construction and procurement of ferry vessels in Scotland
As part of the ferries contract awarded to FMEL in 2015, the first ferry (MV Glen Sannox) was originally due to be delivered in May 2018, with the second due for delivery in July of that same year.
Committee reports
Date published:
13 November 2024
Pre-Budget Scrutiny 2025-26: Third sector funding principles
Others will be reluctant to do so when it may limit the funds they can apply for if their reserves sink below a particular threshold sought by funders.
Committee reports
Date published:
3 July 2019
What should primary care look like for the next generation?
Views were provided that ‘Apps have been shown to be inaccurate and cannot replace assessment by a qualified healthcare professional’ and ‘people may need support when they find out certain results.’
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
21 September 2010
S3W-35948
The figures presented in the published tables are averages; due to rounding, certain totals and sub-totals may not equate to the sum of the component figures shown. 3.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
29 July 2010
S3W-35201
Because there are several different preliminary tests (preliminary breath test, preliminary impairment test, and preliminary drug test), and the police officer involved may administer any one or more of these, the number of such incidents does not relate directly to the number of times that a breathalyser test has been carried out.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
5 May 2009
S3W-23119
A9 Location January February March April May June July August September October November December 2005 ...
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
9 May 2008
S3W-12504
Number of applications received by the SCCRC, broken down by main grounds of review - 1 April 1999 to 31 March 2008 Ground of Review 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 110 Day Rule 0 0 0 0 0 Advanced Technology 1 3 0 1 0 Change in the Law 1 0 1 0 2 Change of Witness Testimony 2 0 0 0 0 Commission''s Powers Required 0 0 0 1 0 Comparative Justice 0 0 0 0 0 Conspiracy 0 0 0 1 2 Credibility/Reliability of Evidence 1 3 5 1 9 Credibility/Reliability of Witness 0 0 0 1 3 Defective Representation 23 20 19 19 17 Denies Acting in Concert 0 1 0 0 0 Diminished Responsibility 0 0 4 3 0 Duress 0 0 0 3 0 Excessive Sentence 3 3 0 2 5 False Accusations 0 1 0 1 0 False Confession 0 0 1 0 0 Human Rights Issue 5 2 2 2 2 Illegal Search 0 0 0 1 0 Improper Service of Indictment 0 1 0 0 0 Jury Misconduct 0 1 0 0 0 Lack of Corroboration 1 2 0 2 0 Mental Health Issues 0 0 0 0 0 Misdirection by Trial Judge 1 4 4 6 4 Mistaken Identity 0 0 1 0 1 New Evidence 34 16 12 5 4 New Witness 0 0 3 4 2 Perjury 15 3 3 2 1 Point of Law 1 0 0 0 0 Police Misconduct 4 1 3 7 3 Procedural Irregularity 2 0 2 1 0 Review of Art and Part 1 0 0 0 0 Self Defence 1 0 0 0 0 Sufficiency 0 0 0 2 0 Unfair Trial 10 0 4 9 16 Unreasonable Jury 2 0 4 1 0 Wrong Sentence Imposed 0 0 0 0 0 Wrongful Conviction 0 1 0 2 4 Not Stated 12 7 3 2 7 Totals =SUM(ABOVE) 120 =SUM(ABOVE) 69 =SUM(ABOVE) 71 =SUM(ABOVE) 79 =SUM(ABOVE) 82 Ground of Review 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Total 110 Day Rule 2 0 0 0 =SUM(LEFT) 2 Advanced Technology 0 0 0 0 =SUM(LEFT) 5 Change in the Law 0 0 0 0 =SUM(LEFT) 4 Change of Witness Testimony 0 0 0 0 =SUM(LEFT) 2 Commission''s Powers Required 0 0 0 0 =SUM(LEFT) 1 Comparative Justice 1 2 1 0 =SUM(LEFT) 4 Conspiracy 0 3 0 2 =SUM(LEFT) 8 Credibility/Reliability of Evidence 27 24 18 13 =SUM(LEFT) 101 Credibility/Reliability of Witness 2 5 3 6 =SUM(LEFT) 20 Defective Representation 9 22 20 19 =SUM(LEFT) 168 Denies Acting in Concert 0 0 0 0 =SUM(LEFT) 1 Diminished Responsibility 0 0 0 0 =SUM(LEFT) 7 Duress 0 0 0 0 =SUM(LEFT) 3 Excessive Sentence 6 7 1 2 =SUM(LEFT) 29 False Accusations 1 4 1 2 =SUM(LEFT) 10 False Confession 1 0 0 0 =SUM(LEFT) 2 Human Rights Issue 2 1 0 0 =SUM(LEFT) 16 Illegal Search 0 0 0 0 =SUM(LEFT) 1 Improper Service of Indictment 0 1 0 0 2 Jury Misconduct 1 4 1 1 8 Lack of Corroboration 1 14 0 0 20 Mental Health Issues 1 3 5 1 10 Misdirection by Trial Judge 3 5 2 4 33 Mistaken Identity 0 1 1 1 5 New Evidence 3 3 3 3 83 New Witness 0 0 0 0 9 Perjury 0 0 0 1 25 Point of Law 0 1 0 0 2 Police Misconduct 4 5 0 0 27 Procedural Irregularity 0 0 0 0 5 Review of Art and Part 0 0 0 0 1 Self Defence 1 2 2 0 6 Sufficiency 0 1 1 1 5 Unfair Trial 7 7 17 13 =SUM(LEFT) 83 Unreasonable Jury 1 0 1 1 10 Wrong Sentence Imposed 0 2 0 0 2 Wrongful Conviction 2 2 4 2 =SUM(LEFT) 17 Not Stated 5 3 0 1 =SUM(LEFT) 40 Totals =SUM(ABOVE) 80 =SUM(ABOVE) 122 =SUM(ABOVE) 81 =SUM(ABOVE) 73 =SUM(LEFT) 777 It should be noted that other grounds of review may...
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
20 July 2007
S3W-01513
(a)The data refers to benefit units, which may be a single person or a couple.(b)The caseloads have been rounded to the nearest 10.
Official Report
Meeting date:
8 October 2008
Economy, Energy and Tourism Committee, 08 Oct 2008
Again, I am thinking about the short term and the Government's role in the present situation. The Government may want to act in a counter-cyclical manner.
Official Report
Meeting date:
16 September 2010
Meeting of the Parliament 16 September 2010
The minister is absolutely right that whoever forms the Government after next May’s election, it would be wise for them to review the housing waiting lists so that we have a clear view of their numbers and make-up so as to reflect the needs of the people on them.
