Thus, 1(1)(d) is only present because a clear discriminatory attitude is seen as acceptable 1 Paragraph 7, Summary: Crowter and Others v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2022] EWCA Civ 1559, https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Crowter-v-SSHSC-summary.pdf 2 Paragraph 72: Crowter and Others v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2022] EWCA Civ 1559, https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Crowter-v-SSHSC-judgment.pdf 3 British Pregnancy Advisory Service, Britain's abortion law, https://www.bpas.org/get- involved/campaigns/briefings/abortion-law/ (Accessed on the 24 January 2023) which contradicts the UK Equality Act 2010, which is not mentioned in the Court of Appeal judgment, and which protects individuals with certain characteristics, such as disability, sex, race, or sexual orientation, from discrimination.