Skip to main content

Parliament dissolved ahead of election

The Scottish Parliament is now dissolved ahead of the election on Thursday 7 May 2026.

During dissolution, there are no MSPs and no parliamentary business can take place.

For more information, please visit Election 2026

Loading…

Search

There are 87,440 results relating to "Getting the Inactive Active"

Order by |

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Official Report Meeting date: 12 November 2002

Subordinate Legislation Committee, 12 Nov 2002

My complaint is that the bill team must get through those aspects of the bill that relate to the committee's remit.
Official Report Meeting date: 12 September 2000

Subordinate Legislation Committee, 12 Sep 2000

The law of adoption in Scotland must sit and wait until the Department of Health in England and Wales gets around to doing something about the matter.
Official Report Meeting date: 28 February 2007

Plenary, 28 Feb 2007

They are not shy; they immediately raise prices. However, they always get the benefit of the doubt when prices come down.
Official Report Meeting date: 6 September 2005

Plenary, 06 Sep 2005

I am sure that we have all been contacted by frustrated parents asking, "Why can't we get the service we require? Why can't we get the local authority to understand that the services they are trying to direct us towards are simply not what we believe our youngster requires?
Official Report Meeting date: 28 January 2003

Local Government Committee, 28 Jan 2003

No—the alternative is that members of the committee vote different ways when the bill gets to Parliament for stage 3. That is the alternative.
Official Report Meeting date: 6 February 2001

Subordinate Legislation Committee, 06 Feb 2001

The bill is trying to use subordinate legislation to get round that, but I would have thought that it would be quite serious if primary legislation was struck down.
Official Report Meeting date: 19 September 2000

Audit Committee, 19 Sep 2000

Point 20, on page 7 of the report— As a point of clarification, I remind members that we are not to get into the body of the report in great detail at this stage.
Official Report Meeting date: 12 June 2000

Enterprise and Lifelong Learning Committee, 12 Jun 2000

When Mr Ewing did not move amendment 7, surely it should have been put to the committee to get its approval that it be withdrawn?
Official Report Meeting date: 9 March 2004

Standards Committee, 09 Mar 2004

Would it be helpful if— We are going to get a little advice, for which we are grateful.
Official Report Meeting date: 9 January 2002

Plenary, 09 Jan 2002

That investigation should not focus simply on the activities of any one company; it should consider both.

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].